ok, ill throw my jest on the subject..
i say the punch or prick mark is more of a acceptance mark then a proof.
iv seen too many examples of unissued parts that have never been proof fired or fitted to a gun with punch marks.
to confuse the matter more.
punch marks on a NM pistol and or rifle, in my opinion, are related to targeting.
example, 60,s NM pistols, NM 1903,s {some} USMC Snipers rifles, and the 1903A4 rifle.
i have had a couple receivers that have not had a bolt fitted to them, with a punch mark on the receiver ridge, one was a 1903A3 and was marked REJECT on the bottom, and no bolt would fit into the rails, the other is a 1901 receiver, thats still unfinished, and has no number or other markings other then the punch on the ridge.
and iv seen a few Remington 03,s with a few punch marks on that ridge, and one Remington 1917..
so,,id say likely a punch mark stands for more then a proof mark.
can stand for Proof fired, targeted, accepted, accepted during rebuild. and hardness testing as well.Information
![]()
Warning: This is a relatively older thread
This discussion is older than 360 days. Some information contained in it may no longer be current.