1. It appears that you are you're enjoying our Military Surplus Collectors Forums, but haven't created an account yet. As an unregistered guest, your are unable to post and are limited to the amount of viewing time you will receive, so why not take a minute to Register for your own free account now? As a member you get free access to our forums and knowledge libraries, plus the ability to post your own messages and communicate directly with other members. So, if you'd like to join our community, please CLICK HERE to Register !

    Already a member? Login at the top right corner of this page to stop seeing this message.

+ Reply to Thread
Page 2 of 5 FirstFirst 1 2 3 4 ... LastLast
Results 11 to 20 of 42
Click here to increase the font size Click here to reduce the font size

Hybrid View

  1. #1
    Contributing Member bros's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2011
    Last On
    06-12-2025 @ 04:31 PM
    Location
    yukon
    Posts
    296
    Local Date
    06-14-2025
    Local Time
    02:29 AM
    Thread Starter
    Quote Originally Posted by painter777 View Post
    Bros
    Do you know if there is a 'Importers Stamp' just below the wood line on the left side of the Receiver ?
    Here is a link with another member North of the Border asking about Value:

    https://www.milsurps.com/showthread.php?t=60120
    Not sure about the importers stamp....the rifle is a long way from me at the moment. I won't be able to answer that question till mid-Jan.
    Thanks that was another informative link.....I confess I feel a little guilty about not doing my homework sometimes before starting threads...….but what the heck, if we didn't have any questions this site would cease to exist.
    Information
    Warning: This is a relatively older thread
    This discussion is older than 360 days. Some information contained in it may no longer be current.

  2. Thank You to bros For This Useful Post:


  3. #2
    Advisory Panel
    painter777's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2009
    Last On
    @
    Location
    Central Michigan
    Posts
    5,493
    Local Date
    06-14-2025
    Local Time
    05:29 AM
    Quite alright,
    I have about 3 weeks left while on the injured reserve list. So it gave me something to dig about. I spent the better part of the other day looking up history/link of a Colt .45 to a MD from WW1. Just to find out the owner was a previous owner. My fault for not reading the post and replies close enough. But found it interesting all the same.
    Good Luck and Happy Holidays to you.
    Quote Originally Posted by bros View Post
    I confess I feel a little guilty about not doing my homework sometimes before starting threads..
    Charlie-Painter777

    A Country Has No Greater Responsibility Than To Care For Those Who Served...

  4. #3
    FREE MEMBER
    NO Posting or PM's Allowed
    manteo97's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2008
    Last On
    01-14-2020 @ 06:44 PM
    Location
    Republic of Vancouver Island, BC
    Posts
    42
    Local Date
    06-14-2025
    Local Time
    04:29 AM
    I have seen this carbine with the double rear sights before. Very easy to knock out the little "wafer" they slid into the dovetail. Then the standard rear sight can be mounted. Notch sight can be removed with a torch, as it is silver soldered on, but trick is to get all of the film of silver solder off, so the receiver can be touched up with Super Blue at worst, or repark the whole receiver at best.

    Germans did NOT mill down the dovetail area, they roll serrated the top of it, and once the wafer is removed, the USGI sight is at the correct height. I've restored a few of these

  5. #4
    Legacy Member GotSnlB28's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2012
    Last On
    06-12-2025 @ 10:31 PM
    Location
    WI
    Posts
    61
    Real Name
    J Voss
    Local Date
    06-14-2025
    Local Time
    03:29 AM
    I'd leave the notch sight in place as part of the history of the rifle. I don't see very many with that sight left intact. Back when CMPicon was selling Bavarian returns, some of the rack grades had the sights removed and all that was left was the ugly silver solder spot. I don't remember anyone posting that they received one with the notch sight.

  6. Thank You to GotSnlB28 For This Useful Post:


  7. #5
    Legacy Member jimb16's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2009
    Last On
    06-10-2025 @ 06:29 PM
    Location
    N.E. Ohio
    Posts
    1,192
    Real Name
    James Barchok
    Local Date
    06-14-2025
    Local Time
    05:29 AM
    DO NOT REMOVE THAT RECEIVER RING SIGHT! That adds a lot to the value of the Bavarian. Those sights are getting very scarce and add a lot to the value! If you need to remove a sight, get rid of the GI one. And try some paint remover on the left edge of the receiver bolt opening. You may find the markings for the Germanicon agency that had the carbine. Sometimes they are marked on the trigger guard or just in front of the trigger guard. If you find them, then we can tell you who had the carbine.
    When they tell you to behave, they always forget to specify whether to behave well or badly!

  8. #6
    Contributing Member bros's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2011
    Last On
    06-12-2025 @ 04:31 PM
    Location
    yukon
    Posts
    296
    Local Date
    06-14-2025
    Local Time
    02:29 AM
    Thread Starter
    Thanks guys for all the input.
    I agree....I will not remove the receiver mounted sight as I think it's integral to the history of this Bavarian carbine.
    I've learned a fair bit about the Bavarian carbines since this thread was started. It seems like there is some collector interest in these so I'll leave it as is.
    Again thanks to all!!!!!

  9. Thank You to bros For This Useful Post:


  10. #7
    Advisory Panel Patrick Chadwick's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2008
    Last On
    06-25-2023 @ 06:36 AM
    Location
    Germany
    Posts
    5,032
    Local Date
    06-14-2025
    Local Time
    11:29 AM
    Dear Bros, all the following comments are predicated on your statement that you wanted to have a shooter! I have no collecting expertise, but as somone who has on a couple of occasions won the BDMP-Hessen championship at 50 meters with such a carbine, I feel qualified to contribute some thoughts as to shootability.

    Quote Originally Posted by bros View Post
    as I was questioning him about the silver soldered add-on rear sight on the breach.
    1) Are you really sure that the add-on sight was silver-soldered. I have, up to now, never seen a backsight that was silver-soldered onto either the barrel or the receiver. They have ALWAYS been soft-soldered, whereby the name "soft solder" is misleading. Unless you intend to hang a medium-sized automobile onto the backsight, silver-soldering would be a) a ridiculous overkill for strength* and b) would totally destroy the tempering of the receiver, also showing up as a discoloration of the heated parts. So I reckon it will be "soft-soldered".

    *For a few years, until I found an original replacement, my SMLE MkV carried an M1917 backsight that was GLUED ON WITH PATTEX.

    2) If you consider that the add-on backsight is a piece of it's history, then you can keep it - as long as it does not interfere with the sight picture through the aperture backsight. If you consider that it is just an unauthorized fudge, then remove it - and, as explained above, I think it will have been soft-soldered.

    ---------- Post added at 12:57 PM ---------- Previous post was at 12:52 PM ----------

    Quote Originally Posted by bros View Post
    I understand that the recoil plate is a Rock-Ola and really doesn't fit the picture.
    So what? It is a rebuild and you want a shooter. I am wary of the frequent desire of collectors to "restore" a rifle to its "original condition" - simply not possible, unless you can time-travel back to the day it left the factory - or "original configuration" - rather more plausible, but all too frequently just falsification - the first step on the road to faking and forgery!

  11. The Following 2 Members Say Thank You to Patrick Chadwick For This Useful Post:


  12. #8
    Legacy Member INLAND44's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2009
    Last On
    10-02-2024 @ 05:31 PM
    Location
    VA
    Posts
    1,134
    Local Date
    06-14-2025
    Local Time
    05:29 AM
    PC; thanks for the elucidation on sight attachment - makes a lot of sense.
    'Really Senior Member' Especially since I started on the original Culver forum. That had to be about 1998.

  13. #9
    Legacy Member bobg's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2009
    Last On
    09-01-2022 @ 01:44 AM
    Posts
    77
    Local Date
    06-14-2025
    Local Time
    02:29 AM
    On my Bavarian, the rear sight is attached to the rear of the barrel, just in front of the forward edge of the receiver. It is attached with a gold colored metal that I believe is brazed. The rear G.I. sight was removed and the mounting area for it was untouched. Mine has a few other odd ball things that were done to it but it was an untouched G.I. carbine when the Germans got it, never having gone through rebuild. It still retains almost all its original parts.

  14. The Following 2 Members Say Thank You to bobg For This Useful Post:


  15. #10
    Advisory Panel Patrick Chadwick's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2008
    Last On
    06-25-2023 @ 06:36 AM
    Location
    Germany
    Posts
    5,032
    Local Date
    06-14-2025
    Local Time
    11:29 AM
    Quote Originally Posted by bobg View Post
    On my Bavarian, the rear sight is attached to the rear of the barrel, just in front of the forward edge of the receiver. It is attached with a gold colored metal that I believe is brazed.
    That could well be brazing, but note that it is on the barrel, not the receiver! As a generalization - i.e. not a lwa written in letters of gold on a mighty slab of granite set atop a high mountain - just a generalization - barrels are effectively a high-quality mild steel and are not hardened by heat treatment. But receivers often use materials such as nickel-steel alloys that are quite touchy about heat-treatment, and any tempering would be lost at brazing temperatures.

    So, as a generalization, one may say: barrels can be brazed, but receivers should not be brazed - not even hard-soldered.
    Last edited by Patrick Chadwick; 12-24-2018 at 10:19 AM.

+ Reply to Thread
Page 2 of 5 FirstFirst 1 2 3 4 ... LastLast

Similar Threads

  1. Opinions Needed: P.38 ac 45 late a-block ...
    By M100C in forum Other Military Service Pistols and Revolvers
    Replies: 4
    Last Post: 04-09-2018, 01:41 PM
  2. Opinions Needed: 44 dot k98
    By M100C in forum Mauser Rifles
    Replies: 2
    Last Post: 02-10-2018, 08:11 AM
  3. No4MK1 T EXPERT OPINIONS NEEDED
    By bros in forum The Lee Enfield Knowledge Library Collectors Forum
    Replies: 17
    Last Post: 02-01-2015, 01:43 PM
  4. Venezuean Police Carbine: opinions needed
    By vintage hunter in forum Mauser Rifles
    Replies: 2
    Last Post: 01-19-2011, 07:49 PM
  5. Advice and opinions needed
    By RickM in forum .22 Smallbore
    Replies: 4
    Last Post: 03-29-2009, 10:38 PM

Tags for this Thread

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts