-
FREE MEMBER
NO Posting or PM's Allowed
Forum Mates: this thread is a perfect example of how a simple question by a new member has used our world-wide resources to make a new discovery and demystify what is now a myth. Great work gentlemen. A simple anomaly became a revelation.
Merci pour votre question, Billy67.
Now, if the labelling of serial numbers on Long Branch's was a factory origination, can the same be said for Savage Enfields? Mine (early 1944) certainly looks like an original stamp on the birch fore-end that coincides with the original receiver serial #s. We could probably validate or invalidate this theory by sharing photos of the serial stampings to see if fonts all match. Or, easier, if a couple of our members with a relatively large number of unmodified Savage Enfields checked: first, to see if there is a serial number on the fore-end, and second, the fonts are similar.
My fore-end serial # is just the last for digits of the entire serial #
Last edited by Seaspriter; 06-13-2015 at 12:31 PM.
-
06-13-2015 12:27 PM
# ADS
Friends and Sponsors
-
Advisory Panel
-
Thank You to Brian Dick For This Useful Post:
-
-
Just the NUMBERS of a letter and number serial number was the tacit norm in my experience. For example my old No4 was 53P10385 which was just 10385 on the fore-end, magazine and bolt. But we would NEVER let a rifle go without the serial number on the fore-end. Some snipers even had the last 4 on the backsight leaf
Last edited by Peter Laidler; 06-13-2015 at 01:34 PM.
-
Thank You to Peter Laidler For This Useful Post:
-
Advisory Panel
The Savage No.4T conversions have the last four digits of the sn neatly stamped on the forend but not the xxC that precedes it. The Greek issue Long Branch rifles I imported many years ago had all of the numbers stamped on the magazines LESS the letter "L" as Peter states above.
-
The Following 2 Members Say Thank You to Brian Dick For This Useful Post:
-
Advisory Panel
You're correct L.E.. I just looked at my two 1944 rifles, one has distinctly
British numbering on the forend and the other which is "minty" does not. Incidentally; of all the LB No.4's I've had through here, I've never seen a 1951 production rifle.
Only 51 dated LB rifles I have seen photos of were all Cno7s.
-
The Following 2 Members Say Thank You to stencollector For This Useful Post:
-
FREE MEMBER
NO Posting or PM's Allowed
Factory Stamped Serial Numbers on Mk2?
If Long Branch was the only manufacturing facility to stamp serial numbers on the fore-ends of No.4.Mk1s, what about the Mk2s?
I have a 10/53 PF series Mk2 that appears to be unissued (IOW has no Armourer's repairs and no dings or usage marks). It has the full serial number "PF3733XX" stamped on the for-end. Was this the practice for all MK2s?
-
FTR; fore ends numbered in accordance with the later build standard/spec
-
Thank You to Peter Laidler For This Useful Post: