+ Reply to Thread
Page 3 of 4 FirstFirst 1 2 3 4 LastLast
Results 21 to 30 of 38

Thread: Question re AIA M10 No 4 mk IV origin

Click here to increase the font size Click here to reduce the font size

Hybrid View

  1. #1
    FREE MEMBER
    NO Posting or PM's Allowed
    Steve's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2006
    Last On
    @
    Location
    Central Ontario
    Posts
    45
    Local Date
    06-10-2025
    Local Time
    05:00 PM
    I don't think that anyone here is concerned about where it's made. I disagree about the price however for reasons already stated at my site. Metalurgy is the big sticking point for me, which walks arm in arm with liability.

    No one has owned and fired one long enough to judge its ability to sustain in the long haul. We'll have to wait for that.

    No one has "knocked" it. Myself and some others have asked questions. Questions which have not been answered. The bling has blinded more people than the others who quesiton it. When the questions are answered, we'll see.
    Information
    Warning: This is a relatively older thread
    This discussion is older than 360 days. Some information contained in it may no longer be current.

  2. #2
    FREE MEMBER
    NO Posting or PM's Allowed
    Dimitri's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2006
    Last On
    05-30-2025 @ 08:06 AM
    Location
    Southern Ontario
    Posts
    262
    Local Date
    06-10-2025
    Local Time
    06:00 PM
    Ever since they were talked about on CGN and they became avalible to the Canadian shooting public I've been wondering to get one or not. I'd really like a 308Win version of the No.4 rifles so these did seem like the best opinion. But a little while ago since the talk on CGN I came to my senses about getting one. For many reasons, cost was a big factor not because of its 800$ price tag. But because for 800$ I'd buy one without question the moment I had enough in the bank if it was made in Australiaicon, Canadaicon or the US but I wouldn't buy one made in Vietnam or China etc for that much especially when I can buy a Norinco M14icon type rifle for half that. As well as a few other things like missing bayonet lugs and stripper clip guides making it for me not a clone of the No.4 but a sporter rifle. Sort of like calling a Win M70 (or any other Claw Feed Mauser type action) a K98kicon if you dressed it in the right wood it just isnt the same.

    As for the issues in Quality Control at whatever factory in Vietnam is making them, only one good way to test that to buy a gun and feed it a few proof loads, I'd start with the standard 70,000PSI and see how many of them it can take before failing. Or you could get it tested for its composition and the like if you had a much bigger budget. But that would be less fun anyways!

    Dimitri

  3. #3
    Advisory Panel stencollector's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2006
    Last On
    02-06-2025 @ 02:55 PM
    Location
    Shilo MB
    Posts
    796
    Local Date
    06-10-2025
    Local Time
    06:00 PM
    We recently gave away a no4mk4 as a doorprize for the Battle of the Bulge shooting match here in Shilo. I had a chance to observe the rifle up close, and there were a few minor cosmetic weak points that I found. The rear sling swivel screws in to the buttstock did not seat fully in to the tapered holes of the swivel base. Also , the front sling swivel looked a little amatureish where the loop was welded to the swivel piece. It certainly was not up to the LongBranch standard of finish. Grind marks over the weld were very evident.
    Small points, sure, but on a $800 rifle, I would have expected a level of workmanship equal to the mass produced wartime rifles.
    Can't say as I'm too keen on the allen head bolts holding the front sight base in either. The whole front sight base looks a little square for my liking.
    I can be a hard man to please. Personally, I would take a DCRA converion LB Enfield with a Sterling mag for about the same money.

  4. #4
    Legacy Member bearhunter's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2006
    Last On
    08-16-2024 @ 02:46 PM
    Location
    Okanogan, BC
    Posts
    509
    Local Date
    06-10-2025
    Local Time
    03:00 PM
    Cantom, I have the Match model rifle, I really like it. There don't seem to be any safety concerns with it at all. No set back on the lugs or receiver guides.
    Steve brings up some very pertinent questions.
    If these rifles hadn't been used for many years by many Aussies, I would probably not have bought the rifle.
    As I said, I do own one, I'm not telling you to buy one either, but mine is a real jewel. No regrets.
    These rifles will probably not be available for much longer. I think that once their gone, that's it.
    They aren't cheap and are not within reach of a lot of people. I think that these will be the last lee enfields produced and may just be the best of them. Bearhunter

  5. #5
    FREE MEMBER
    NO Posting or PM's Allowed
    caper's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2007
    Last On
    04-09-2007 @ 01:50 AM
    Posts
    1
    Local Date
    06-10-2025
    Local Time
    06:00 PM
    I recently bought a longbranch one at CGN as my first rifle, looking foreward to getting my paws on it. Steve makes some good points but his conspiracy theory website seemed a little too much for me to swallow. I'm new to the shooting scene but it seemed to me AIA just wanted its transition to a new market to go as smooth as possible and it backfired on them. (the dismal reports I have read about the 7.62x39 platform probably didn't help either) No big mystery there. I suspect that the .308 will do well and eventually the market will accept it for what it is, another good rifle.
    As for liability, what do you think would happen if a norinco M14icon blew up in someones face? Far more likely in my opinion, but hasn't dissuaded too many shooters.

  6. #6
    Legacy Member Cantom's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2006
    Last On
    05-24-2021 @ 08:44 AM
    Location
    Ontario Canada
    Posts
    411
    Real Name
    Tom
    Local Date
    06-10-2025
    Local Time
    06:00 PM
    Thread Starter
    Quote Originally Posted by caper View Post
    I recently bought a longbranch one at CGN as my first rifle, looking foreward to getting my paws on it. Steve makes some good points but his conspiracy theory website seemed a little too much for me to swallow. I'm new to the shooting scene but it seemed to me AIA just wanted its transition to a new market to go as smooth as possible and it backfired on them. (the dismal reports I have read about the 7.62x39 platform probably didn't help either) No big mystery there. I suspect that the .308 will do well and eventually the market will accept it for what it is, another good rifle.
    As for liability, what do you think would happen if a norinco M14icon blew up in someones face? Far more likely in my opinion, but hasn't dissuaded too many shooters.
    That conspiracy theory thing was WAY overblown. I found it less than fair personally.

  7. #7
    FREE MEMBER
    NO Posting or PM's Allowed
    AUSSIE's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2007
    Last On
    05-28-2017 @ 05:30 PM
    Posts
    5
    Local Date
    06-10-2025
    Local Time
    05:00 PM


    Love these guns dudes!! Never seen one fail to feed, fire, extract or eject ever!! You all been conned if you think these things aren't reliable!! No probs more for us Aussies to keep!! YeeeHaaaa!!!!

  8. #8
    Senior Moderator
    (Founding Partner)


    Site Founder
    Claven2's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2006
    Last On
    Today @ 08:38 AM
    Location
    Scandaltown, Ontario
    Posts
    3,288
    Real Name
    Ronald
    Local Date
    06-10-2025
    Local Time
    06:00 PM
    How are the 7.62x39 versions holding up in Oz? We still haven;t got them yet here in Canadaicon, but I suspect it's more from our government's paperwork requirements than a supplier issue.
    Союз нерушимый республик свободных Сплотила навеки Великая Русь. Да здравствует созданный волей народов Единый, могучий Советский Союз!

  9. #9
    Head Moderator
    (Founding Partner)

    Site Founder
    Stevo's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2006
    Last On
    08-31-2015 @ 06:39 PM
    Location
    NW Alberta
    Posts
    2,357
    Local Date
    06-10-2025
    Local Time
    04:00 PM
    Given the way the prices of Lee-Enfields keep sky-rocketing in Canadaicon, I think the AIA rifles will start to look more and more attractive to shooters.

    The "why would I spend $800 when I can get a real LE for $400" arguement is starting to lose it's relevance.

    That reminds me, I need to get out and shoot mine. Definitely need to try it out to 500m this year.

  10. #10
    Legacy Member Cantom's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2006
    Last On
    05-24-2021 @ 08:44 AM
    Location
    Ontario Canada
    Posts
    411
    Real Name
    Tom
    Local Date
    06-10-2025
    Local Time
    06:00 PM
    Thread Starter
    Quote Originally Posted by Stevo View Post
    Given the way the prices of Lee-Enfields keep sky-rocketing in Canadaicon, I think the AIA rifles will start to look more and more attractive to shooters.

    The "why would I spend $800 when I can get a real LE for $400" arguement is starting to lose it's relevance.

    That reminds me, I need to get out and shoot mine. Definitely need to try it out to 500m this year.
    Do you think they'd make a good Ranger rifle Stevo?

+ Reply to Thread
Page 3 of 4 FirstFirst 1 2 3 4 LastLast

Tags for this Thread

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts