Help! Misaligned Pads on No 4.

[Surpmil]

ok heres the photos.

That there is what we call "FUGLY" over here; I'm sure it needs no explanation.

The rifle's a beaut though; don't give up on it. Any retired tool & die maker should be able to do far better than that.

Brian, when are your going to start doing these for people so they get them done properly and properly collimated, at least on this side of the water?

Information

Warning: This is a relatively older thread This discussion is older than 360 days. Some information contained in it may no longer be current.

[Roger Payne]

I hope that the more optimistic amongst us are correct, & I certainly take no joy in offering a negative opinion, but I think that rear pad is so high the rifle body is practically knackered. However, this is assuming the front pad is of approximately the right dimensions & fitted in approximately the right position, & that the rear pad is approximately of the right overall dimensions. If that is the case the rear pad is far too high & the only way of retrieving the situation would be to raise the front pad in equal proportion (not recommended) or to remove the rear pad, fill in the holes, & the re-fit it correctly), again, not a worthwhile proposition, I would have thought - remember that heat treatment to the locking lug recess in this area.

I would be interested to know what Peter or any other service trained armourer thinks, though.....

[Peter Laidler]

Peter is thinking about this after browsing the photos and looking at the utterly dismal work of the so-called REME Armourer (of which I know more but prefer to stay silent). But while it looks a disaster area and a total waste of one of the very historic and last No4's produced, there might be an optimistic shred of hope. I will add more later. But it will take a real Armourer or gunsmith to fix it. So please, please please stay clear of enthusiastic amateurs and butchers who have absolutely no concept of the dynamics and mechanics of what you hope to achieve. Indeed, some will be offering you some, er......, what we call 'bullsh........, er....., bovine scattology.

Anyone can bolt a telescope to a rifle but not everyone can get it right. I'll come back later.........

LATER; If I was you, this is what I'd do. First, I'd accept that your rifle is now worth the sum of its parts BUT you can(?) salvage it like this. Remove the rear pad and see just how well the front pad is aligned. You do this by fitting the bracket with your telescope to the rifle. But ONLY do this after having first centred the optical axis of the tip of the graticle to the mechanical axis of the tube. A better bet would be to use/borrow a proper No32. I say this because this is the telescope that you will eventually (?) put on the rifle.

If the telescope can be brought into alignment as per the details I gave in the article I wrote, then you might be part way to seeing some optimism ahead.

Take your rifle to someone who knows what he's doing and ask him to slightly countersink the three existing BA and BSF holes and then silver solder steel threaded plugs into the existing holes into the rear screw holes. If your man can't do something this simple, go somewhere else or ask me and I will put you in contact with someone who can.

When the holes are plugged and filed flush, get the same person to start the rear pad operation again but this time, EXACTLY as detailed previously. Naturally you/he will now be drilling and tapping part into the original now securely plugged original holes put there by the blind idiot who butchered it to start with. I see you and several others teccies out there wincing at the thought........ But don't be afraid. Those motor racing 998 Mini's and MG Midgets/Modsport racers have been doing this offset plugging to extreme pressure engine blocks and cylinder heads since the 60's.

By silver soldering the threaded plugs in place they will be secure and the heat generated will be insufficient to affect the hardened locking lugs that you've got to preserve. Do not be tempted to use hard steel plugs for technical reasons. Mild steel is what you need.

When he's finished it, ask him to bead blast, phosphate and paint the body. You won't even need to un-breech the barrel.

That's all there is to it unless you need to ask any questions. Anyone of a more technical bent please, please feel free to question my idea. I appreciate that we'd just scrap the thing but needs must and all that.

[Seaspriter]

So please, please please stay clear of enthusiastic amateurs and butchers who have absolutely no concept of the dynamics of what you hope to achieve.

After following this post, I am so relieved to have had Brian Dick do the work on my Long Branch Sniper (https://www.milsurps.com/showthread.php?t=55567 ). I had considered doing the work myself, and after reading Captain Laidler's detailed description of the job, it became quite evident I had neither the expertise nor the tools to do the job at any level that would be a world class standard. (I realized I would be characterized as one of Peter's "enthusiastic amateurs and butchers")

I mean no disrespect but for us the collectors/users of these rifles, [but] where will we go in 15/20 years people like Peter L and Brian D and others in the background are, like all of us, on a clock.

So very true CINDERS. We do need a new generation of Lee Enfield gunsmiths to carry the tradition. As you say:

Properly cared for these Enfields/Mausers/Garands/M-1's will outlast us as long as the spares allow them.

Perhaps there is an aspiring young man in Edmonton who sees himself in this role?

[Sentryduty]

Originally Posted by CINDERS
Properly cared for these Enfields/Mausers/Garands/M-1's will outlast us as long as the spares allow them.
Perhaps there is an aspiring young man in Edmonton who sees himself in this role?

Soaking up everything I can, as fast as I can. I will see how far I can go!

I have a couple ideas on how I would tackle this this specific situation, however I am more keen to see how it should be done.

[jr57]

Peter is thinking about this after browsing the photos and looking at the utterly dismal work of the so-called REME Armourer (of which I know more but prefer to stay silent). But while it looks a disaster area and a total waste of one of the very historic and last No4's produced, there might be an optimistic shred of hope. I will add more later. But it will take a real Armourer or gunsmith to fix it. So please, please please stay clear of enthusiastic amateurs and butchers who have absolutely no concept of the dynamics and mechanics of what you hope to achieve. Indeed, some will be offering you some, er......, what we call 'bullsh........, er....., bovine scattology.

Anyone can bolt a telescope to a rifle but not everyone can get it right. I'll come back later.........

LATER; If I was you, this is what I'd do. First, I'd accept that your rifle is now worth the sum of its parts BUT you can(?) salvage it like this. Remove the rear pad and see just how well the front pad is aligned. You do this by fitting the bracket with your telescope to the rifle. But ONLY do this after having first centred the optical axis of the tip of the graticle to the mechanical axis of the tube. A better bet would be to use/borrow a proper No32. I say this because this is the telescope that you will eventually (?) put on the rifle.

If the telescope can be brought into alignment as per the details I gave in the article I wrote, then you might be part way to seeing some optimism ahead.

Take your rifle to someone who knows what he's doing and ask him to slightly countersink the three existing BA and BSF holes and then silver solder steel threaded plugs into the existing holes into the rear screw holes. If your man can't do something this simple, go somewhere else or ask me and I will put you in contact with someone who can.

When the holes are plugged and filed flush, get the same person to start the rear pad operation again but this time, EXACTLY as detailed previously. Naturally you/he will now be drilling and tapping part into the original now securely plugged original holes put there by the blind idiot who butchered it to start with. I see you and several others teccies out there wincing at the thought........ But don't be afraid. Those motor racing 998 Mini's and MG Midgets/Modsport racers have been doing this offset plugging to extreme pressure engine blocks and cylinder heads since the 60's.

By silver soldering the threaded plugs in place they will be secure and the heat generated will be insufficient to affect the hardened locking lugs that you've got to preserve. Do not be tempted to use hard steel plugs for technical reasons. Mild steel is what you need.

When he's finished it, ask him to bead blast, phosphate and paint the body. You won't even need to un-breech the barrel.

That's all there is to it unless you need to ask any questions. Anyone of a more technical bent please, please feel free to question my idea. I appreciate that we'd just scrap the thing but needs must and all that.

Ok thanks Peter, I don't think I shall be returning to said person for the work. I'll make some enquiries and I do have some options but I may take you up on your offer.

Once again many thanks and to all for their inputs.

[Ridolpho]

I may be totally out to lunch here but does the top surface of the front pad not look a wee bit higher than normal? I dug my '43 T out of the safe and, in the OP's photos it seems a bit higher. is it possible the front pad is non-standard forcing the installer to put the rear pad higher than normal. Hard to believe someone would intentionally put the rear pad up that high for no reason. To the OP- how bad is the scopes collimation relative to the bore? The scope body doesn't look too badly misaligned (and it's amazing how easy it is to see misalignment).

Ridolpho

[vintage hunter]

I may be totally out to lunch here but does the top surface of the front pad not look a wee bit higher than normal?

I agree, it does look a bit high.

is it possible the front pad is non-standard forcing the installer to put the rear pad higher than normal.

Seems there was a thread a while back involving a repro sniper with similar misalignment issues caused by an out of spec front pad.

[smle addict]

I was thinking the same thing, Ridolpho. I thought my eyes were broken, so I ran out and dug my 43 T out of the safe too. I took two pics for of the front pad for comparative purposes. The OP's pads do look taller (thicker?) than an original set.

[jr57]

[QUOTE=Ridolpho;356747]I may be totally out to lunch here but does the top surface of the front pad not look a wee bit higher than normal? I dug my '43 T out of the safe and, in the OP's photos it seems a bit higher. is it possible the front pad is non

Hello, The pads I handed over were Numrich ones and I can only assume that he used them.

The scope might not look too bad on the phots but believe me its miles out of collimation way over to the left and low. The ret is optically centred.