+ Reply to Thread
Page 9 of 9 FirstFirst ... 7 8 9
Results 81 to 89 of 89

Thread: A study of No.4 Mk.I "Trials" rifles: information requested!

Click here to increase the font size Click here to reduce the font size

Hybrid View

  1. #1
    Advisory Panel Surpmil's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2008
    Last On
    @
    Location
    West side
    Posts
    5,055
    Local Date
    06-09-2025
    Local Time
    10:43 PM
    Thread Starter
    It's a VERY early rifle built at Fazakerly(? on a leftover trials body (receiver).

    The simplified cocking piece is very unusual, and we wouldn't expect to see a Long Branch pressed safety catch spring either on such a rifle AFAIK.

    However the finish is a close match, so perhaps they have been together for a long time. The screw is different from the standard as well.

    I see the Enfield "D/E" hybrid mark on the safety catch and that is what we would expect on such a rifle.

    Does it have the "waisted" foresight protector, hinged upper band and other such trials rifle features?
    Last edited by Surpmil; 10-19-2024 at 12:03 AM.
    “There are invisible rulers who control the destinies of millions. It is not generally realized to what extent the words and actions of our most influential public men are dictated by shrewd persons operating behind the scenes.”

    Edward Bernays, 1928

    Much changes, much remains the same.

  2. Thank You to Surpmil For This Useful Post:


  3. #2
    Contributing Member Jim Shortill's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2024
    Last On
    11-03-2024 @ 11:43 AM
    Location
    Southern Maine
    Posts
    4
    Local Date
    06-10-2025
    Local Time
    12:43 AM
    Here is the link from Gunbroker. I'm not in buying mode, but figured I would pass it on for knowledge sake. It has many of the trials rifle features. I've been super busy at work so I haven't had time to get my geek on, and go through my reference books.
    https://www.gunbroker.com/item/1066819771
    Last edited by Jim Shortill; 10-19-2024 at 11:02 AM.

  4. #3
    Advisory Panel Surpmil's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2008
    Last On
    @
    Location
    West side
    Posts
    5,055
    Local Date
    06-09-2025
    Local Time
    10:43 PM
    Thread Starter
    Forget most of what I said in #83 which was based on the previous statement that the backsight had a ball-bearing detent: it doesn't.

    The machining on the receiver is also too rough to be RSAF(E).

    Does have a "trials" safety though.
    Attached Thumbnails Click image for larger version

Name:	pix544617373.jpg‎
Views:	738
Size:	137.0 KB
ID:	137559   Click image for larger version

Name:	pix544617374.jpg‎
Views:	616
Size:	168.0 KB
ID:	137560  
    Last edited by Surpmil; 10-19-2024 at 10:46 PM.
    “There are invisible rulers who control the destinies of millions. It is not generally realized to what extent the words and actions of our most influential public men are dictated by shrewd persons operating behind the scenes.”

    Edward Bernays, 1928

    Much changes, much remains the same.

  5. #4
    Contributing Member Jim Shortill's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2024
    Last On
    11-03-2024 @ 11:43 AM
    Location
    Southern Maine
    Posts
    4
    Local Date
    06-10-2025
    Local Time
    12:43 AM
    I did notice it had the plunger and not the ball indent. That's why I was thinking it might be one of the later C pattern. So what's your thought on the rifle? A high number trials that was mostly rebuilt? Do any of the others rifle number identifiers (on on other trials rifles) - A XXXX - come with a prefix / suffix letter like this one?

  6. #5
    Advisory Panel Surpmil's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2008
    Last On
    @
    Location
    West side
    Posts
    5,055
    Local Date
    06-09-2025
    Local Time
    10:43 PM
    Thread Starter
    My opinion is it's an early receiver from Fazackerly, the A suffix serial indicates this, but rough as guts overall and definitely NOT a trials receiver.

    The No.5 trigger guard doesn't "belong" on an early rifle, and the cocking piece was probably stuck on in order to make it look superficially interesting by whoever sanded the wood down and generally massaged the rifle before it was put in the auction.

    Aside from the safety, there is a chance the mag might be a trials example, from the level of finishing overall, but one would have to see rib and platform for the marks if any.

    FUGLY importer marks as the crowning glory.
    Last edited by Surpmil; 10-20-2024 at 05:35 PM.
    “There are invisible rulers who control the destinies of millions. It is not generally realized to what extent the words and actions of our most influential public men are dictated by shrewd persons operating behind the scenes.”

    Edward Bernays, 1928

    Much changes, much remains the same.

  7. #6
    Advisory Panel Lance's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2007
    Last On
    Yesterday @ 04:47 AM
    Location
    New England, USA
    Posts
    703
    Real Name
    Lance
    Local Date
    06-10-2025
    Local Time
    01:43 AM
    Your rifle serial number is really "EA23074A" with the last 4 hard to read, made at ROF Fazakerley in June 1943. Sorry, it is not an early rifle. If you look off-axis just below the backsight above the safety catch arm you might see "ROF(F)6/43"

  8. #7
    Contributing Member Jim Shortill's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2024
    Last On
    11-03-2024 @ 11:43 AM
    Location
    Southern Maine
    Posts
    4
    Local Date
    06-10-2025
    Local Time
    12:43 AM
    Thanks for the insight.
    Sorry for the delay. Tore my bicep and had both daughters cars go down at once. Been a week of slow repairs.

    And yes, that import mark is a truly horrific scar.

  9. Thank You to Jim Shortill For This Useful Post:


+ Reply to Thread
Page 9 of 9 FirstFirst ... 7 8 9

Similar Threads

  1. Ithaca 37 "Trench Gun" - Opinions Requested
    By mtrpdw in forum Military Shotguns
    Replies: 12
    Last Post: 10-19-2017, 09:47 AM
  2. Enfield No4(T) "Trials Rifle" scope brackets
    By jmoore in forum The Lee Enfield Knowledge Library Collectors Forum
    Replies: 41
    Last Post: 09-27-2014, 02:52 AM
  3. Trials "T" with a "T" stamp on underside of receiver
    By rayg in forum The Lee Enfield Knowledge Library Collectors Forum
    Replies: 29
    Last Post: 10-07-2011, 02:12 PM
  4. Update of Pattern 1913 "Trials" Rifle (.276 in.) MKL Article
    By Badger in forum Pattern 1913/1914 and M1917 Rifles
    Replies: 1
    Last Post: 11-09-2010, 07:19 PM
  5. Updated 1933 No.4 Mk1(T) Sniper "Trials Rifle" MKL Entry
    By Badger in forum The Lee Enfield Knowledge Library Collectors Forum
    Replies: 0
    Last Post: 01-15-2010, 07:23 PM

Tags for this Thread

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts