+ Reply to Thread
Results 1 to 6 of 6

Thread: .223 or 5.56 ???

Click here to increase the font size Click here to reduce the font size
  1. #1
    FREE MEMBER
    NO Posting or PM's Allowed
    SSgt's Son's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2009
    Last On
    03-25-2016 @ 03:50 PM
    Age
    73
    Posts
    19
    Local Date
    10-31-2024
    Local Time
    06:56 PM

    .223 or 5.56 ???

    I generally don't read this forum, and apologize if this is something that has been beaten to death here, but is there a real difference in ammo identified as .223, versus ammo identified as 5.56? Read some comments on 5.56 ammo listed in Cheaper/than/Dirt, and those posts made it seem like there is a REAL danger in using 5.56 in a firearm identified as .223.

    I thought that the ammo was the same. Would appreciate your comments on this.

    Thanks.
    Information
    Warning: This is a relatively older thread
    This discussion is older than 360 days. Some information contained in it may no longer be current.

  2. # ADS
    Friends and Sponsors
    Join Date
    October 2006
    Age
    2010
    Posts
    All Threads
    A Collector's View - The SMLE Short Magazine Lee Enfield 1903-1989. It is 300 8.5x11 inch pages with 1,000+ photo’s, most in color, and each book is serial-numbered.  Covering the SMLE from 1903 to the end of production in India in 1989 it looks at how each model differs and manufacturer differences from a collecting point of view along with the major accessories that could be attached to the rifle. For the record this is not a moneymaker, I hope just to break even, eventually, at $80/book plus shipping.  In the USA shipping is $5.00 for media mail.  I will accept PayPal, Zelle, MO and good old checks (and cash if you want to stop by for a tour!).  CLICK BANNER to send me a PM for International pricing and shipping. Manufacturer of various vintage rifle scopes for the 1903 such as our M73G4 (reproduction of the Weaver 330C) and Malcolm 8X Gen II (Unertl reproduction). Several of our scopes are used in the CMP Vintage Sniper competition on top of 1903 rifles. Brian Dick ... BDL Ltd. - Specializing in British and Commonwealth weapons Specializing in premium ammunition and reloading components. Your source for the finest in High Power Competition Gear. Here at T-bones Shipwrighting we specialise in vintage service rifle: re-barrelling, bedding, repairs, modifications and accurizing. We also provide importation services for firearms, parts and weapons, for both private or commercial businesses.
     

  3. #2
    FREE MEMBER
    NO Posting or PM's Allowed
    hagar in SC's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2009
    Last On
    07-23-2012 @ 08:14 PM
    Location
    Columbia, SC
    Posts
    27
    Local Date
    10-31-2024
    Local Time
    06:56 PM
    Yes, it has been beat to death...

    The only time it will be a problem, is when you shoot 5.56 loaded with heavy bullets in a bolt action 223 with a short throat. Any AR with a 1 in 9 twist or faster will shoot either just fine, so will a Mini-14.

  4. Avoid Ads - Become a Contributing Member - Click HERE
  5. #3
    FREE MEMBER
    NO Posting or PM's Allowed
    jjroth's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2009
    Last On
    11-02-2010 @ 10:58 PM
    Posts
    185
    Local Date
    10-31-2024
    Local Time
    03:56 PM

    Its really simple..

    the 5.56Nato uses a thicker case than the .223, due to use in Class III firearms.

    The NATO chamber is made to accomodate the heavier case. use of the .223 is permissible but reload life is shorten, due to the chamber being on the hight side of the tolerance range. Also the throat is longer (more freebore) than the .223 chamber.

    Some sporting firearms have "tighter chambers' that will increase pressure higher than normal. So keep the 5.56 ammo use in a sporting rifle to a MINIMUM.

  6. #4
    FREE MEMBER
    NO Posting or PM's Allowed
    Rick S's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2009
    Last On
    10-02-2019 @ 01:59 PM
    Posts
    11
    Local Date
    10-31-2024
    Local Time
    05:56 PM
    Have a Savage 25 bolt action that will miss fire when using Federal 5.56. The primers are too hard for the firing pin strike on my rifle.

    Rifle went back to Savage and ammunition went back to Federal. They came up with the diagnosis that nothing was wrong with the rifle, nothing was wrong for the ammunition, the rifle was not compatible with the ammunition.

  7. #5
    FREE MEMBER
    NO Posting or PM's Allowed
    Mizzouboy's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2009
    Last On
    02-23-2016 @ 12:19 PM
    Location
    Alabama
    Posts
    110
    Local Date
    10-31-2024
    Local Time
    04:56 PM
    Plus, NATO spec 5.56 is loaded much hotter than SAAMI (sporting) specs. Standard military loads reach pressures that are close to SAAMI proof load pressures. The increased freebore and bigger chambers in military arms helps reduce this effect, at a small sacrifice in accuracy but improved reliability.

  8. #6
    Legacy Member AKA Hugh Uno's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2009
    Last On
    04-12-2020 @ 07:37 PM
    Posts
    303
    Local Date
    10-31-2024
    Local Time
    06:56 PM

    reality is

    military CASES may or may not be thicker/heavier. some are, some are not.

    military AMMO may or may not be loaded to higher pressures (and even when it is, actual testing shows it usually isn't significantly higher.

    Velocity TENDS to run about 100 fps faster with SOME 5.56 surplus, but there is no way you are gonna be close to a "proof" load pressure. Maybe with a bolt gun from the early 60's and a SS109 green tip round JAMMED into the rifling would you get up to 60,000 psi (and I suspect proof is closer to 70K or more).

    All AR and bolt gun manufacturers today cut chambers that EASILY accomodate ANY .223 or 5.56 ammo (including so called "match" chambers).

    actual known "blow ups" of .223 rifles caused by MILLIONS of people shooting BILLIONS and BILLIONS of rounds of cheaper 5.56 over 40+ years = almost certainly ZERO.
    Last edited by AKA Hugh Uno; 06-15-2009 at 06:37 AM. Reason: clarification

  9. Thank You to AKA Hugh Uno For This Useful Post:


+ Reply to Thread

Tags for this Thread

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts