+ Reply to Thread
Page 1 of 2 1 2 LastLast
Results 1 to 10 of 16

Thread: Presentation M1's - Looking for pictures

Click here to increase the font size Click here to reduce the font size

Hybrid View

  1. #1
    FREE MEMBER
    NO Posting or PM's Allowed
    apothegm's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2009
    Last On
    11-09-2009 @ 12:06 PM
    Posts
    18
    Local Date
    06-12-2024
    Local Time
    09:16 PM

    Presentation M1's - Looking for pictures

    Anyone have receiver pics of presentation carbine? Closeups of area behind the rear sight and in front of the bolt would be very helpful.
    Information
    Warning: This is a relatively older thread
    This discussion is older than 360 days. Some information contained in it may no longer be current.

  2. #2
    FREE MEMBER
    NO Posting or PM's Allowed
    Mike Henning's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2009
    Last On
    07-01-2013 @ 12:57 AM
    Posts
    49
    Local Date
    06-12-2024
    Local Time
    07:16 PM
    Why??

  3. Avoid Ads - Become a Contributing Member - Click HERE
  4. #3
    FREE MEMBER
    NO Posting or PM's Allowed
    apothegm's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2009
    Last On
    11-09-2009 @ 12:06 PM
    Posts
    18
    Local Date
    06-12-2024
    Local Time
    09:16 PM
    Thread Starter
    I have a mystery Inland with no serial number behind the rear sight and no evidence of grinding or tampering. I'm about to take it in to the local BATF office and would like to take it with me when I leave. The area in front of the bolt has been ground down and I thought it might have been a presentation piece, but I'm curious as to what might have been obliterated from that front area. Pics of other presentation carbines might give me a clue.

  5. #4
    Legacy Member BrianQ's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2009
    Last On
    08-21-2022 @ 04:50 PM
    Posts
    466
    Local Date
    06-12-2024
    Local Time
    10:16 PM
    Quote Originally Posted by apothegm View Post
    I have a mystery Inland with no serial number behind the rear sight and no evidence of grinding or tampering.
    It sure does have evidence of grinding both in the front and the rear.

    Now ask yourself one question.

    Why would a company make a presentation carbine and remove their own name?

  6. #5
    Legacy Member Milsurp Collector's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2008
    Last On
    @
    Location
    USA
    Posts
    209
    Local Date
    06-12-2024
    Local Time
    06:16 PM
    Quote Originally Posted by apothegm View Post
    I have a mystery Inland with no serial number behind the rear sight and no evidence of grinding or tampering. I'm about to take it in to the local BATF office and would like to take it with me when I leave.
    Before you get a new serial number, it might be possible to recover the original serial number of the carbine with modern forensic techniques:

    http://lucy.mrs.org/2006brazil/wedpix/j502.pdf
    http://www.mfrc.ameslab.gov/R-D_Repo...le_Final-1.pdf

  7. #6
    Legacy Member wtmr's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2009
    Last On
    08-01-2023 @ 09:02 PM
    Posts
    302
    Local Date
    06-12-2024
    Local Time
    10:16 PM

    link to album of gun presented to Ordnance Inspector

    Picasa Web Albums - marcus - NPM from OGRAM It has new ATF serial number stamped on left side of receiver below the woodline
    Last edited by wtmr; 07-14-2009 at 05:13 PM. Reason: forgot some info

  8. #7
    FREE MEMBER
    NO Posting or PM's Allowed
    apothegm's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2009
    Last On
    11-09-2009 @ 12:06 PM
    Posts
    18
    Local Date
    06-12-2024
    Local Time
    09:16 PM
    Thread Starter
    Hi Brian - I'm not convinced that the area behind the sight has been altered. The question I have asked myself and am asking the board, is, why did someone go to so much trouble to grind off -

    U.S. CARBINE
    CAL .30 M1icon

  9. #8
    Legacy Member BrianQ's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2009
    Last On
    08-21-2022 @ 04:50 PM
    Posts
    466
    Local Date
    06-12-2024
    Local Time
    10:16 PM
    Not convinced. Okay, how many Inland receivers in the sub 50,000 serial number range have you compared your receiver to come up with the determination the roll stamps were not ground off?

    The evidence of grinding is present at the front of the receiver and the shape of the receiver behind the rear sight has been altered on yours. Both indicate the roll stamps were ground off.

    Inland made more presentation carbines than all the other manufacturers combined. All of them had the Inland name and special serial numbers in the normal location as well as the front receiver ring markings.

  10. #9
    Legacy Member Milsurp Collector's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2008
    Last On
    @
    Location
    USA
    Posts
    209
    Local Date
    06-12-2024
    Local Time
    06:16 PM
    Underwood presentation carbine (not mine)



    Quote Originally Posted by apothegm View Post
    Hi Brian - I'm not convinced that the area behind the sight has been altered. The question I have asked myself and am asking the board, is, why did someone go to so much trouble to grind off -

    U.S. CARBINE
    CAL .30 M1icon
    With 1911 pistols serial numbers and other markings were sometimes removed by civilian owners to try and hide the US Government Property status of the firearm The M1911 Pistols Organization Forums Site - Serial Number

    I hope you didn't get that carbine from someone in a different state. While it is legal to own a firearm that never had a serial number, a firearm that has had its serial number removed or obliterated is another matter:

    § 178.34 Removed, obliterated, or altered serial number.


    No person shall knowingly transport, ship, or receive in interstate or foreign commerce any firearm which has had the importer's or manufacturer's serial number removed, obliterated, or altered, or possess or receive any firearm which has had the importer's or manufacturer's serial number removed, obliterated, or altered and has, at any time, been shipped or transported in interstate or foreign commerce.


    [T.D. ATF-313, 56 FR 32508, July 17, 1991]


    ATF - The Gun Control Act of 1968, Public Law 90-618

  11. #10
    FREE MEMBER
    NO Posting or PM's Allowed
    Piercesaw's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2009
    Last On
    01-01-2016 @ 12:57 PM
    Posts
    57
    Local Date
    06-12-2024
    Local Time
    09:16 PM
    Quote Originally Posted by apothegm View Post
    Hi Brian - I'm not convinced that the area behind the sight has been altered. The question I have asked myself and am asking the board, is, why did someone go to so much trouble to grind off -

    U.S. CARBINE
    CAL .30 M1icon
    Maybe it was U.S. Carbine CAL. 30 m2 that was ground off.

+ Reply to Thread
Page 1 of 2 1 2 LastLast

Similar Threads

  1. M1's for Vets Match, Linden Michigan
    By rifle guy in forum M1 Garand/M14/M1A Rifles
    Replies: 1
    Last Post: 06-03-2009, 03:06 PM
  2. Do Beretta M1's show the same tooling marks as Winchester M1's?
    By gary25 in forum M1 Garand/M14/M1A Rifles
    Replies: 9
    Last Post: 05-09-2009, 11:29 PM
  3. 1902 Presentation Saber
    By noworky in forum Edged Weapons Forum
    Replies: 2
    Last Post: 04-10-2009, 04:36 PM
  4. Student Mentions CCW in Class Presentation, Prof Calls Cops
    By SoCal M1 Shooter in forum The Watering Hole OT (Off Topic) Forum
    Replies: 12
    Last Post: 03-06-2009, 09:19 PM
  5. New M1's (for me)
    By sdh1911 in forum Milsurps General Discussion Forum
    Replies: 6
    Last Post: 02-03-2009, 11:11 PM

Tags for this Thread

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts