So what can you tell me about Savage made Snipers with Canadian Markings?Information
Warning: This is a relatively older thread
This discussion is older than 360 days. Some information contained in it may no longer be current.
So what can you tell me about Savage made Snipers with Canadian Markings?Information
Warning: This is a relatively older thread
This discussion is older than 360 days. Some information contained in it may no longer be current.
/l\ isn't Canadian unless it is within a "C". A number of the first Savages supplied to the UK were converted to sniper equipments. I suppose this was in the period when shipments of No. 4s were arriving in the UK, but there was not a sufficient stock to start large scale replacement of the SMLE. While there are standard Savage made No. 4 rifles with Canadian marks, the majority went to the UK. What scope is on the rifle? It is possible that a Savage "T" was issued to Canadian troops overseas.
It's within the C, hard to draw though! C/|\
I've seen a large C/l\ on the top of the receiver ring of Savage made rifles. What scope is on the rifle? Manufacturer, Mark, etc.? Any suggestion where the rifle was set up as a sniper? Early Savage T's may have been set up at Enfield, rather than H&H. While no Ts are common, a Savage set up at Long Branch would be exceptionally unusual. Can you post photos?
I'll wait for a few more replies before posting.
Greg,
You may not get many more replies with the limited info you've posted. Pics and details of the scope and markings will get a much better response.
There were NO Savage snipers set up at Long Branch.
This is a common story, but is unfortunately false.
Any gauges would have been set-up for LB receivers, and by the time Savage shut down (late '44), LB was building snipers from the receiver up (as per Law) rather than targeting & rebuilding as in the UK.
ALL Savage Ts were set up in England. There is conflicting evidence (the commonly known H&H markings did not fully develop until '44), but the consensious seems to be that all of them were converted by Holland & Holland (they are missing one of the unique Enfield inspection stamps)per Tompkins&Payne.
The initial 1400 "trials" (Skennerton) rifles converted by Enfield may have (Tompkins&Payne) included some Savages & Brit 1941 dated No4s. However the Savages seem unlikely as apparently the initial lot was rejected by the inspectors (as per Skennerton).
As to the Canadian property markings: All of the pictures I have seen of Canadian ETO snipers are using Non LB products where identifiable.