+ Reply to Thread
Page 1 of 2 1 2 LastLast
Results 1 to 10 of 18

Thread: Savage No. 4 Mk1*T (????)

Click here to increase the font size Click here to reduce the font size
  1. #1
    Legacy Member Ridolpho's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2012
    Last On
    09-27-2022 @ 11:12 PM
    Location
    Province of Alberta, Canada
    Age
    66
    Posts
    1,019
    Local Date
    10-31-2024
    Local Time
    05:33 PM

    Savage No. 4 Mk1*T (????)

    I'd appreciate some feedback on this rifle I recently purchased. On the surface it appears to be a Savage sniper conversion (sans scope and bracket). Bolt/ body serial numbers match and I assume lack of number on barrel is a US thing? Pretty much every marked part has a "flaming bomb" including the barrel which is a two groove variety in good condition. The body appears to be parkerized a light grey and is in good condition. As to the important markings, it has "TR" on the left socket, "T" on the left body, an "S" on the cutoff boss on the right, "TR" on the bottom of the forend. The Enfield testers mark (as mentioned in Mr. Laidlers excellent book) may be present on the right side of the bolt channel but appears to have been bashed at some point. There are remnant marks consistent with the original. There is no "S51" mark on the buttstock. Various other markings that mean nothing to me include an "F" benath the butt adjoining the socket and an "H" under the forend. The scope mounting pads are in rough shape and may not be original. The screws on the rear pad, in particular, don't look like something that would come from H&H or an armourer. There is a wood insert in the bedding area under the barrel reinforce. The sling swivel at the front of the triggerguard is aftermarket. I didn't pay overly much for this and my plans are to mount (for now) a vintage Weaver K3 on an aftermarket bracket which I've already purchased. I'd appreciate comments about the possibility that this is a real "T" as well as ideas about the alignment of a scope given that I'd rather not take the existing pads off. Thanks, in advance.

    Ridolpho
    Information
    Warning: This is a relatively older thread
    This discussion is older than 360 days. Some information contained in it may no longer be current.
    Last edited by Ridolpho; 05-05-2019 at 03:40 PM.

  2. # ADS
    Friends and Sponsors
    Join Date
    October 2006
    Location
    Milsurps.Com
    Age
    2010
    Posts
    All Threads
    A Collector's View - The SMLE Short Magazine Lee Enfield 1903-1989. It is 300 8.5x11 inch pages with 1,000+ photo’s, most in color, and each book is serial-numbered.  Covering the SMLE from 1903 to the end of production in India in 1989 it looks at how each model differs and manufacturer differences from a collecting point of view along with the major accessories that could be attached to the rifle. For the record this is not a moneymaker, I hope just to break even, eventually, at $80/book plus shipping.  In the USA shipping is $5.00 for media mail.  I will accept PayPal, Zelle, MO and good old checks (and cash if you want to stop by for a tour!).  CLICK BANNER to send me a PM for International pricing and shipping. Manufacturer of various vintage rifle scopes for the 1903 such as our M73G4 (reproduction of the Weaver 330C) and Malcolm 8X Gen II (Unertl reproduction). Several of our scopes are used in the CMP Vintage Sniper competition on top of 1903 rifles. Brian Dick ... BDL Ltd. - Specializing in British and Commonwealth weapons Specializing in premium ammunition and reloading components. Your source for the finest in High Power Competition Gear. Here at T-bones Shipwrighting we specialise in vintage service rifle: re-barrelling, bedding, repairs, modifications and accurizing. We also provide importation services for firearms, parts and weapons, for both private or commercial businesses.
     

  3. #2
    Administrator

    Site Owner
    Badger's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2006
    Last On
    @
    Location
    Toronto, Canada
    Age
    76
    Posts
    12,967
    Real Name
    Doug
    Local Date
    10-31-2024
    Local Time
    07:33 PM
    My Videos in Video Club
    12
    Check the MKLicon and read this article by Advisory Panelicon member Lance:

    1942 No.4 Mk1*(T) Savage Sniper Rifle (less scope)

    Regards,
    Doug

  4. Avoid Ads - Become a Contributing Member - Click HERE
  5. #3
    Advisory Panel
    Peter Laidler's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2008
    Last On
    10-20-2024 @ 05:01 AM
    Location
    Abingdon, Oxfordshire. The home of MG Cars
    Posts
    16,569
    Real Name
    Peter Laidler
    Local Date
    11-01-2024
    Local Time
    12:33 AM
    The rifle is real, but a No4T it most definately ain't real........... I'll let some of the others come in and explain all of the gory details

  6. #4
    Administrator

    Site Owner
    Badger's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2006
    Last On
    @
    Location
    Toronto, Canada
    Age
    76
    Posts
    12,967
    Real Name
    Doug
    Local Date
    10-31-2024
    Local Time
    07:33 PM
    My Videos in Video Club
    12
    Well, I'm no expert, just a K98kicon collector, but looking at this one compared to my wife's 1942 No.4 Mk1*(T) Savage Sniper Rifle (less scope) shown in the MKLicon with the accompanying article by Advisory Panelicon member Lance, I see the following..

    1. Serial number is out of the accepted 11C to 15C range and has the later cocking handle as one would expect for a serial number 23C5499

    2. The were often re-barrelled with UKicon made 5 groove barrels, as shown in MKLicon, so question, is this an Enfield made 5 groove barrel? If so, it should be marked with Enfield proofs on the barrel as shown in MKL example.

    3. Sling swivel is a civilian aftermarket add-on, not military.

    4. T on receiver side and also a TR on underside of wood, as well as butt tang under serial number? I've never seen this on a Savage and it's not on the MKL example.

    5. There's an S stamped on the right side of receiver which isn't there in original No.4 Mk1*(T) Savage Sniper Rifles, as shown in photo montage in MKL.

    6. Cheek rest is way too far forward as compared to example in MKL, or for that matter, any No.4 Mk1*(T) sniper rifle I've viewed.

    7. There's no rear sight at all? Should be a [S]avage marked sight if it was there.

    8. There's no rifle serial number stamped in the front wood on the underside.

    Anyway, I'm just a rookie on these, but with just a quick five minute comparison to the MKL example, that's what I see, or more particularly, what I don't see.

    How'd I do Peter?

    Regards,
    Doug

  7. #5
    Contributing Member
    bigduke6's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2008
    Last On
    10-25-2024 @ 08:51 AM
    Location
    North West England,UK
    Posts
    3,287
    Local Date
    11-01-2024
    Local Time
    12:33 AM
    Have to admit I dont know my arse from my elbow when it comes to these, I,ve read Peters books, and looked at many pics, only ever held a real one once and also a real L42, but the thing that stands out like a sore thumb (more of an engineering point) to me is the rear pad, the screws and the stake etc, also the pads set back maybe a bit more than what Peter states in his book, the T (stamped twice) and the cheek rest.
    Last edited by bigduke6; 05-20-2012 at 07:26 PM. Reason: grammer

  8. #6
    Legacy Member Ridolpho's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2012
    Last On
    09-27-2022 @ 11:12 PM
    Location
    Province of Alberta, Canada
    Age
    66
    Posts
    1,019
    Local Date
    10-31-2024
    Local Time
    05:33 PM
    Thread Starter

    Not looking good!

    Thank's for the replies so far. Badger- I have been through all the references I could find on the site and was hopeful based on comments about observed 2 groove T's, etc. I should note the rear sight is currently off the rifle but is not correct for a "T". One thing I find a bit strange is the thought that H&H wouldn't stamp a "T" on the body on Savage conversions (as on the example rifle on the forum). Also, with regard to the "TR" found on Britishicon manufactured rifles selected for conversion- do we know for certain Savages selected were not similarly marked and, if so, was it because they were not selected in a similar manner? The S51 being absent on the butt doesn't seem conclusive to me as butts get changed and, from the references, it seems the S51 may not be present prior to a certain point in time. Another thought- the S51 is well known and would, to me, be the easiest mark to fake (about the only thing I would be capable of doing!).

  9. #7
    Moderator
    (Lee Enfield Forum)


    tbonesmith's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2007
    Last On
    05-19-2024 @ 11:53 PM
    Location
    Sydney, Australia
    Posts
    1,076
    Real Name
    Thomas Smith
    Local Date
    11-01-2024
    Local Time
    10:33 AM
    My attitude would be to either way, scope it up and get it shooting, and enjoy it for what it is. Maybe a fake, but not a bad clone none the less. All the better if it shoots well.

  10. Thank You to tbonesmith For This Useful Post:


  11. #8
    FREE MEMBER
    NO Posting or PM's Allowed
    Norton1's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2012
    Last On
    11-19-2019 @ 12:40 PM
    Location
    United States
    Posts
    121
    Local Date
    10-31-2024
    Local Time
    04:33 PM
    What tbone said +1

  12. #9
    Legacy Member Ridolpho's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2012
    Last On
    09-27-2022 @ 11:12 PM
    Location
    Province of Alberta, Canada
    Age
    66
    Posts
    1,019
    Local Date
    10-31-2024
    Local Time
    05:33 PM
    Thread Starter

    Thanks for input.

    I appreciate the comments. I'm looking at this rifle as a bit of a forced education in #4 sniper rifles. When I purchased it I was far from home and with only a couple of references to look at. The older collector (sniper rifles his speciality) I bought it from swore it to be genuine but - he also dropped his price fairly readily. I'm left with a few rather academic questions: 1) why did H&H not "T" stamp their Savage conversions? 2) are no known Savage 4*T's "TR" stamped and, if not, were they even selected for accuracy? I'll finish this off with a couple of photos of what appears to be a possible attempt at a stamp that appears to have glanced off the surface (note striations) but still left a few faint impressions. This mark is at the rear end of the body on the right side of the bolt channel almost precisely where a small mark appears on Badger's wife's rifle best seen on photo #48 (Knowledge Libraryicon; 1942 No. 4 Mk1*(T) Savage less scope. For those in the know, is this the Enfield inspectors mark? These shots are taken with a microscope and side lighting. The height of the smeared (mark?) is about 3mm.
    Again, thanks for the comments- I've only been into the Lee Enfields for about a year and it's a huge help to be able to tap into the knowledge base that exists on this forum.
    Last edited by Ridolpho; 05-05-2019 at 03:41 PM.

  13. #10
    Legacy Member Alan de Enfield's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2007
    Last On
    Today @ 05:36 AM
    Location
    Y Felinheli, Gogledd Cymru
    Posts
    2,613
    Real Name
    Alan De Enfield
    Local Date
    10-31-2024
    Local Time
    11:33 PM
    I think those litle 'figure 8' type marks could be the US proof marks - the 'flaming bomb'

    Last edited by Alan de Enfield; 05-21-2012 at 02:09 PM.
    Mine are not the best, but they are not too bad. I can think of lots of Enfields I'd rather have but instead of constantly striving for more, sometimes it's good to be satisfied with what one has...

  14. Thank You to Alan de Enfield For This Useful Post:


+ Reply to Thread
Page 1 of 2 1 2 LastLast

Similar Threads

  1. Savage No 4T
    By read6737 in forum The Lee Enfield Knowledge Library Collectors Forum
    Replies: 8
    Last Post: 09-25-2010, 12:23 PM
  2. Savage No.4 MK1 again...
    By Treeman in forum The Lee Enfield Knowledge Library Collectors Forum
    Replies: 7
    Last Post: 02-06-2010, 08:44 AM
  3. Savage MK1 No.4
    By Treeman in forum The Lee Enfield Knowledge Library Collectors Forum
    Replies: 2
    Last Post: 02-01-2010, 09:42 AM
  4. Savage 12 F/TR
    By Major Tom in forum The Watering Hole OT (Off Topic) Forum
    Replies: 4
    Last Post: 07-20-2009, 11:15 AM

Tags for this Thread

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts