-
FREE MEMBER
NO Posting or PM's Allowed
1903 Low Number Rock Island for Desporterizing
-
08-26-2010 08:07 PM
# ADS
Friends and Sponsors
-
The rear sight looks original (although the "7"s on the leaf should have straight bases). The AV barrel MAY be from a post-WWI overhaul.
A grasping groove stock would be correct. A 1909 or 1910 RIA barrel would also be correct, but they are pricy and hard to find.
My feeling, is that most of the parts looks "period" correct (post WWI) and I would be tempted to keep as many as possible, including the barrel. Rust can be cleaned off. The rear sight really can't be improved on, as far as looks. Considering it is a low numbered M1903, I don't think it is worth going to extraordinary means to update.
I would look for a stock, upper band and lower band and leave it at that.
Look on the top and bottom of the bolt and on all sides of the safety lug (about halfway up the bolt body) - what markings do you see?
People sleep peaceably in their beds at night only because rough men stand ready to do violence on their behalf.
--George Orwell
-
-
-
FREE MEMBER
NO Posting or PM's Allowed
Hi Rick,
In regards to the Low numbered issue and the receiver not being strong enough to shoot would it be ok if I had a good gunsmith look at it and make sure it has a tight headspace? I was reading Hatchers Notebook and apart from the Hardening process he pointed out that some of the receivers failed due to loose headspace and the cartraige slamming back on the bolt and also read somewhere that the gasses would backflow between the casing and chamber to make the rifles fail. So if I did the due diligence of making sure the headspace was good it should be alot safer to fire than the ones that failed. Has a receiver failed in the last 30 or so years? or have most of them been found and taken off the market?
-
FREE MEMBER
NO Posting or PM's Allowed
The rear sight looks original (although the "7"s on the leaf should have straight bases). The AV barrel MAY be from a post-WWI overhaul.
A grasping groove stock would be correct. A 1909 or 1910 RIA barrel would also be correct, but they are pricy and hard to find.
My feeling, is that most of the parts looks "period" correct (post WWI) and I would be tempted to keep as many as possible, including the barrel. Rust can be cleaned off. The rear sight really can't be improved on, as far as looks. Considering it is a low numbered M1903, I don't think it is worth going to extraordinary means to update.
I would look for a stock, upper band and lower band and leave it at that.
Look on the top and bottom of the bolt and on all sides of the safety lug (about halfway up the bolt body) - what markings do you see?
Rick I just checked the bolt all over and the only mark I could find is a Rockwell B hardness mark with a T.
-
If that is the case, a very early Springfield or RIA bolt.
People sleep peaceably in their beds at night only because rough men stand ready to do violence on their behalf.
--George Orwell
-