My new pristine Long Branch, what a find!

[artyldr01]

Well, made a 2 1/2 hour drive to look at a LB I saw online. Totally worth it. I think I got a real gem.

LB No 4 MkI* but with many early features.
SN:56L9036, bolt matches. Mag not numbered.
Forearm with "cutout" notch. Forearm/butt/rear handguard (grooved) match inspector marks/date 43 B/66 and broad arrow C.
Wrist marks also include oval with small numbers 070(?) and a X.
Early button style cocking piece.
Mk II rear sight.
2 groove barrel looks unused at all.
Early "fish tail"(?) safety.
Everything except magazine, front handguard and buttsocket LB interlaced marked. Those other parts are Savage.
Barrel marked 43 with Crown over crossed flags over P with a D(?) on the left. Also stamped 6, H, R,A, 8 in various places.
Trigger housing plate un-waisted(?) if that is the correct term.
Finish is pristine. Other than storage marks on the stock, the rifle seems unissued.
Still much cosmoline.

I think I done good...damn I can't wait for Skennerton's book and Broad Arrow to arrive!

Information

Warning: This is a relatively older thread This discussion is older than 360 days. Some information contained in it may no longer be current.

[artyldr01]

Here are a few more detail pics. This thing looks awfully original. Interesting that a 1943 rifle has so many early features though...

Can anyone explain the proof mark with crossed guidons, crown on top, P on bottom (fairly standard) but a D on the left side?

Thanks

Niels

[Skip]

I was told that arrow on the receiver are South African acceptance mark.

[enfield303t]

Great find, congrats.

[Lee Enfield]

It looks to me like a post 1949 CAL FTR due to the phosphate parkerized receiver finish.

Nice score

---------- Post added at 07:24 PM ---------- Previous post was at 07:15 PM ----------

I was told that arrow on the receiver are South African acceptance mark.

The marking on the receiver ring is a "C" Broad Arrow Canadian military property marking.

[artyldr01]

What is a "CAL" FTR? I assumed all FTRs had FTR stamp but I recall now that Canadian's didn't necessarily do that. I am very stoked. Even if arsenal FTRd it apparently went straight to storage afterwards. This actually makes me even happier to know that it likely did see use at some point to warrant being rebuilt. Couldn't figure out how a 1943 would have been so clean. Thanks for the input! Skennerton's book is in the mail as we speak (as is the Broad Arrow). Can't wait to get it.

[Lee Enfield]

snip...

Can anyone explain the proof mark with crossed guidons, crown on top, P on bottom (fairly standard) but a D on the left side?

Thanks

Niels

D.C.P is a Canadian Military proof mark which appears to have originated at Ross Rifle Factory internal inspection which was adopted by Canadian military inspectors who were seconded to inspect british purchased arms at the beginning of/during wwI.

[artyldr01]

D.C.P is a Canadian Military proof mark which appears to have originated at Ross Rifle Factory internal inspection which was adopted by Canadian military inspectors who were seconded to inspect british purchased arms at the beginning of/during wwI.

Thank You, Lee Enfield, I really appreciate it.

[Lee Enfield]

What is a "CAL" FTR? I assumed all FTRs had FTR stamp but I recall now that Canadian's didn't necessarily do that. I am very stoked. Even if arsenal FTRd it apparently went straight to storage afterwards. This actually makes me even happier to know that it like did see use at some point to warrant being rebuilt. Couldn't figure out how a 1943 would have been so clean. Thanks for the input! Skennerton's book is in the mail as we speak (as is the Broad Arrow). Can't wait to get it.

CAL FTRs are not marked as such in the traditional British fashion.

On January 1, 1946 "Small Arms Limited" (commonly known as "Long Branch") became "Canadian Arsenals Limited" or "CAL" but still commonly known as "Long Branch" during the Enfield era.

[artyldr01]

Once again, much thanks! LE!