-
Advisory Panel
Commercial BSA No.1 Mk1 with Afghanistan gov't seal in two places.kB
BSA made this commercial proofed No.1 Mk1 .303 rifle for the Afghanistan government circa 1910. It is marked with the Afghan circular seal on the knox form and receiver socket.
Attachment 121740Attachment 121741Attachment 121742Attachment 121743Attachment 121744
The status symbol silver bling was added later. Note the cutoff plate has a rivet. The rifle is a returned war trophy as faint markings on the butt plate indicate a Marine Sgt. with obscure name owned it at one time.
Information
|
Warning: This is a relatively older thread This discussion is older than 360 days. Some information contained in it may no longer be current. |
|
-
The Following 11 Members Say Thank You to breakeyp For This Useful Post:
Brian Dick,
butlersrangers,
CINDERS,
free1954,
Gil Boyd,
Jc5,
Roger Payne,
Salt Flat,
Simon P,
smle addict,
Steve H. in N.Y.
-
11-30-2021 04:44 PM
# ADS
Friends and Sponsors
-
Legacy Member
Looks more like a locally-made Dara one to me.
-
-
-
Legacy Member
not something you see every day. those boys sure know how to make their weapons pretty.
-
-
Advisory Panel
Originally Posted by
Mk VII
locally-made
The markings remind me of a local made too. I'd still love to have it.
-
-
Legacy Member
Originally Posted by
Mk VII
Looks more like a locally-made Dara one to me.
That BSA marking on the butt socket doesn't look like the font, or size of any BSA I've seen. The fact that the letter are double stamped slightly out of line would suggest it is not a marking made in a 'production line environment'
I was looking at some BSA SHTLE 1 yesterday and the markings were nothing like that one.
Mine are not the best, but they are not too bad. I can think of lots of Enfields I'd rather have but instead of constantly striving for more, sometimes it's good to be satisfied with what one has...
-
-
Legacy Member
Agree it's probably not a BSA, but I'd still like to have it.
-
Thank You to limpetmine For This Useful Post:
-
Advisory Panel
Originally Posted by
limpetmine
I'd still like to have it.
Agreed. People ask how safe to shoot these are if made by locals, I suspect this one has had it's share of combat action in past.
-
-
Legacy Member
The photographs show the markings to be rather 'native looking'.
The double Broad Arrows and knurling on the sight-guard, are suspect.
The commercial 'proof' appears done by hand.
I had the privilege of seeing this rifle and other Khyber gems, in Paul's fine display at the Michigan Antique Arms Collector's show, five days ago.
It is much more deceptive, when seen in person!
The rifle is a thing of beauty and the government seal on the 'knox-form' is rather convincing.
Attachment 121785
Last edited by butlersrangers; 12-02-2021 at 09:05 AM.
-
The Following 3 Members Say Thank You to butlersrangers For This Useful Post:
-
Legacy Member
The V.R. proofmark is also anachronistic. Some of these locally produced ones can look quite convincing, but something usually gives it away.
-
Thank You to Mk VII For This Useful Post:
-
Originally Posted by
Alan de Enfield
That BSA marking on the butt socket doesn't look like the font, or size of any BSA I've seen. The fact that the letter are double stamped slightly out of line would suggest it is not a marking made in a 'production line environment'
+1
Not legitimate commercial BSA markings.... but I'd still love to own it, just for the bling and the story!
.
.
Researching Lee Speeds and all commercial Lee Enfields. If you have data to share or questions, please send me a PM.
-