+ Reply to Thread
Results 1 to 2 of 2

Thread: Ross with Winchester A5 telescope

Click here to increase the font size Click here to reduce the font size
  1. #1
    Contributing Member Promo's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2009
    Last On
    @
    Location
    Europe
    Posts
    1,862
    Local Date
    10-31-2024
    Local Time
    11:54 PM

    Ross with Winchester A5 telescope

    Since I wasn't able to find much information on those rifles (nor someone telling he owns one of them), a few questions I asked myself:

    These rifles, were they officially adopted in Canadaicon, or did the Britishicon tell them to build these rifles?

    This question leads me to the next one, I was asking myself mainly whether they'd directly purchase the Winchester A5 telescopes in the US, or if they were officially British purchased scopes with also the British property markings, which were then given to Canada for sniper rifles?

    When were they fitted, and did they use any specific serial blocks or manufacturing years? And are there numbers of rifles manufactured known?

    I assume they only used M1910 rifles, but nearly all original pictures show cutback stocks. But does that mean all of them were officially cut back?

    Was there an official scope carrying pouch for this scope, or did they leave them in place all time?

    Hopefully there is someone here able to answer my questions, looking forward to what you're able to tell me .
    Information
    Warning: This is a relatively older thread
    This discussion is older than 360 days. Some information contained in it may no longer be current.

  2. # ADS
    Friends and Sponsors
    Join Date
    October 2006
    Location
    Milsurps.Com
    Posts
    All Threads
    A Collector's View - The SMLE Short Magazine Lee Enfield 1903-1989. It is 300 8.5x11 inch pages with 1,000+ photo’s, most in color, and each book is serial-numbered.  Covering the SMLE from 1903 to the end of production in India in 1989 it looks at how each model differs and manufacturer differences from a collecting point of view along with the major accessories that could be attached to the rifle. For the record this is not a moneymaker, I hope just to break even, eventually, at $80/book plus shipping.  In the USA shipping is $5.00 for media mail.  I will accept PayPal, Zelle, MO and good old checks (and cash if you want to stop by for a tour!).  CLICK BANNER to send me a PM for International pricing and shipping. Manufacturer of various vintage rifle scopes for the 1903 such as our M73G4 (reproduction of the Weaver 330C) and Malcolm 8X Gen II (Unertl reproduction). Several of our scopes are used in the CMP Vintage Sniper competition on top of 1903 rifles. Brian Dick ... BDL Ltd. - Specializing in British and Commonwealth weapons Specializing in premium ammunition and reloading components. Your source for the finest in High Power Competition Gear. Here at T-bones Shipwrighting we specialise in vintage service rifle: re-barrelling, bedding, repairs, modifications and accurizing. We also provide importation services for firearms, parts and weapons, for both private or commercial businesses.
     

  3. #2
    Advisory Panel Surpmil's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2008
    Last On
    @
    Location
    West side
    Posts
    4,846
    Local Date
    10-31-2024
    Local Time
    03:54 PM
    Quote Originally Posted by Promo View Post
    Since I wasn't able to find much information on those rifles (nor someone telling he owns one of them), a few questions I asked myself:

    These rifles, were they officially adopted in Canadaicon, or did the Britishicon tell them to build these rifles?

    This question leads me to the next one, I was asking myself mainly whether they'd directly purchase the Winchester A5 telescopes in the US, or if they were officially British purchased scopes with also the British property markings, which were then given to Canada for sniper rifles?

    When were they fitted, and did they use any specific serial blocks or manufacturing years? And are there numbers of rifles manufactured known?

    I assume they only used M1910 rifles, but nearly all original pictures show cutback stocks. But does that mean all of them were officially cut back?

    Was there an official scope carrying pouch for this scope, or did they leave them in place all time?

    Hopefully there is someone here able to answer my questions, looking forward to what you're able to tell me .
    The Canadians bought scopes in December 1914, before anyone else except the Central Powers. The 8th Battalion CEF sent in a request to the W.O. for permission to buy scopes in early 1915 . Eventually word came back that the W.O. had no nomenclature or allocation for telescopic sights so permission could not be granted (or denied presumably!). The same with the .280 Ross: a request was sent in for permission to purchase them and eventually an officer turned up to ask some questions about it, but nothing ever happened.

    As you know, some 500 W&S scopes were fitted to Ross MkIIIs and about 180 issued in Franceicon, as well as various "Long Lees" and SMLEs with different models of telescopic and Galilean sights issued through British channels. It is most likely the the Canadian issue Winchester scopes were purchased directly, either by the units in France or by the Canadian Department of Militia & Defense. I don't think we know which for certain, quite possibly both. Winchester wouldn't have cared who paid as long as the money was in their account and the Canadians didn't worry about paper trails as much as some others. AFAIK, none have been seen with British inspection marks that do not have SMLE serial numbers engraved on the tubes.

    The Winchester scopes were not serial numbered from the factory and AFAWK were not serial numbered to the Ross rifles. There was no reason to do so really as the scopes were pretty much interchangeable insofar as the bases were concerned.

    I conclude that the barrels were cut back because they interfered with the field of view of the A5 scope. That's just my personal view and I haven't seen it asserted anywhere else. Otherwise, the front sight base could have just been knocked off and that would have been that. Cutting and crowning the barrel was a lot more work and there must have been a reason, other than making the rifle a couple of inches shorter for handling reasons.

    The forends were cut back for all the usual reasons: weight, ease of handling and concealment etc. Somewhere I read that the 3rd Can. Div. did not allow stocks to be cut back, but I can't be sure it was the 3rd without checking.

    AFAWK, cases were supplied with the scopes, at least some times; Iriam refers to this and in some photos of scout/snipers case straps can be seen. Later in the war, when it may have become known that snipers were loath to remove the scopes from their rifles, the lack of need for cases MIGHT have led to scopes being ordered without them. Just a guess on my part though.

    Have you read Frank Iriam's memoir?

    Edit: I see there is a quite a bit more detail about this in "Without Warning" so you'd better get a copy if you want the fuller story.
    Last edited by Surpmil; 11-06-2015 at 01:24 AM. Reason: clarity
    “There are invisible rulers who control the destinies of millions. It is not generally realized to what extent the words and actions of our most influential public men are dictated by shrewd persons operating behind the scenes.”

    Edward Bernays, 1928

    Much changes, much remains the same.

  4. Thank You to Surpmil For This Useful Post:


  5. Avoid Ads - Become a Contributing Member - Click HERE
+ Reply to Thread

Similar Threads

  1. No4 T telescope
    By bow in forum The Lee Enfield Knowledge Library Collectors Forum
    Replies: 40
    Last Post: 12-29-2012, 02:45 PM
  2. ROSS 1910 R Marker .303 Ross and LC
    By RCEMERalf in forum The Ross Rifle Knowledge Library Collectors Forum
    Replies: 3
    Last Post: 08-02-2012, 01:26 PM
  3. REL No.42 telescope
    By Brian Dick in forum The Lee Enfield Knowledge Library Collectors Forum
    Replies: 11
    Last Post: 04-16-2010, 05:01 PM

Tags for this Thread

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts