New Long Branch No.4 Mk.1*, a few questions

[kar98k]

ok, well first and foremost hello all. i recently picked up a Canadian Long Branch No.4 Mk.1*. as you can tell by my username, Enfields aren't exactly my area of expertise. i have a few questions about it.

the 2 wooden pins through the stock and the fact that most of the metal appears to have been painted black at one point i was told mean it was sent to India after the war. i assume that's why it has an SMLE butt plate on it as well? (as you can see in the pics i posted).

on the left side just below the safety is a " '46". i assume this is the year it was re-aresenalled? would Canada have done this or would it have been India? the only marking i can find on the stock is a large "G" right in front of the trigger guard. am i correct in assuming this is a replacement stock?

here are the pics:

Attachment 20397Attachment 20401Attachment 20398Attachment 20402Attachment 20399Attachment 20400


i appreciate any and all help on this as i am really not knowledgeable in Enfields. thanks guys

Information

Warning: This is a relatively older thread This discussion is older than 360 days. Some information contained in it may no longer be current.

[Amatikulu]

I modified your post to display the pics. I don't think those wood dowels were inserted in India - their process was to insert a metal wood screw. it looks like a proper armoroer's repair for a split fore stock - the kind of thing Peter Laidler would have done in his apprenticeship

[kar98k]

I modified your post to display the pics. I don't think those wood dowels were inserted in India - their process was to insert a metal wood screw. it looks like a proper armoroer's repair for a split fore stock - the kind of thing Peter Laidler would have done in his apprenticeship

really? so this doesn't look like an Indian (or worse Paki or Turkish) purchase rifle?

thanks for the posting help

[limpetmine]

Careful, there, big fellah! Lots of nice, and interesting rifles have returned via Turkey, India and Pakistan. Just because a rifle saw some use
(or misuse) doesn't diminish what it is (a fine rifle with an interesting history)

[jona]

Those wooden pins are a form of bedding. Used extensively by the DCRA and others. This was in the days before acraglass.

[limpetmine]

That was my first thought, but these pins seem to be a little too far forward from where the bedding pins usually go, IIRC.

Those wooden pins are a form of bedding. Used extensively by the DCRA and others. This was in the days before acraglass.

[No4Mk1(T)]

That was my first thought, but these pins seem to be a little too far forward from where the bedding pins usually go, IIRC.

You are correct. The wood pins found on DCRA accurized No.4 rifles are aligned vertically near the back of the forearm roughly in line with the charger bridge. They are pushed through the stock to touch the back of the receiver which stops latteral movement of the receiver within the stock.

[Peter Laidler]

Those oak pegs are just normal Armourers methods of reinforcing a heel or toe patch in the butt (or anywhere come to that.....). The pegs either side of the SCREW, front trigger guard have been inserted to stop a crack spreading from the front of the magazine well up, along the fore-end.

Where we detected a crack, we would spread the crack, squeeze glue into it, then insert the cross screw that you all refer to as 'the ishy screw'. In fact this was a modification formuated by Britain and is incorporated into our EMER's. BUT, it looked unsightly so instead of the screw, we started to insert an oak dowel..... or even a couple, depending on the apparent length of the crack. Hammer it in, leave to dry/cure for 24 hours and make good. It wouldn't crack again, believe me! And those undercut dovetailed and pegged butt patches will last a lifetime

From this Kar98, you can rightly assume that your rifle has been in British service unless you find anything to the contrary

On the matter of the DCRA pins at the REAR of the fore-end, I could be wrong but surely they were there to reinforce the internal patches we used to call 'DRAWER PACHES', the hardwood replacement inserts used to DRAW the fore-end UPWARDS but REARWARDS against the butt socket. That as opposed to preventing the body moving left and right in the fore-end. It'd have to go some to overcome the centreing influence of the knox form/barrel reinforce

[kar98k]

ahh the many mysteries of the Enfield Rifles . thanks for the info

[No4Mk1(T)]

On the matter of the DCRA pins at the REAR of the fore-end, I could be wrong but surely they were there to reinforce the internal patches we used to call 'DRAWER PACHES', the hardwood replacement inserts used to DRAW the fore-end UPWARDS but REARWARDS against the butt socket. That as opposed to preventing the body moving left and right in the fore-end. It'd have to go some to overcome the centreing influence of the knox form/barrel reinforce

Not in this case Peter though your explanation makes perfect sense. The plugs are stacked vertically, about a quarter of an inch apart just below the level of the safety screw near the top edge of the stock on both sides. I would be more accurate to say they are positioned in line about a quarter of the way back between the charger bridge and the back sight mount (if that makes any sense). The reference I have says their sole purpose was to control any shift of the receiver sufficient to upset the bedding. The idea for the plugs was that of veteran Canadian armorer W.O.1 H.L Keech for the 1964 Canadian National Matches.