+ Reply to Thread
Page 1 of 4 1 2 3 ... LastLast
Results 1 to 10 of 34

Thread: Lock Bar Sight Originality

Click here to increase the font size Click here to reduce the font size
  1. #1
    FREE MEMBER
    NO Posting or PM's Allowed
    dbarn's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2009
    Last On
    04-05-2017 @ 10:46 PM
    Posts
    412
    Local Date
    10-31-2024
    Local Time
    06:57 PM

    Lock Bar Sight Originality

    Is there a method to determine if lock bar rear sights are original as mfgd. to a rifle vs. a restoration? Also, is it normal for the rear sight cover to be a lighter or darker color? Should it have the same patina/wear as the rest of the receiver? Thanks.
    Information
    Warning: This is a relatively older thread
    This discussion is older than 360 days. Some information contained in it may no longer be current.

  2. # ADS
    Friends and Sponsors
    Join Date
    October 2006
    Posts
    All Threads
    A Collector's View - The SMLE Short Magazine Lee Enfield 1903-1989. It is 300 8.5x11 inch pages with 1,000+ photo’s, most in color, and each book is serial-numbered.  Covering the SMLE from 1903 to the end of production in India in 1989 it looks at how each model differs and manufacturer differences from a collecting point of view along with the major accessories that could be attached to the rifle. For the record this is not a moneymaker, I hope just to break even, eventually, at $80/book plus shipping.  In the USA shipping is $5.00 for media mail.  I will accept PayPal, Zelle, MO and good old checks (and cash if you want to stop by for a tour!).  CLICK BANNER to send me a PM for International pricing and shipping. Manufacturer of various vintage rifle scopes for the 1903 such as our M73G4 (reproduction of the Weaver 330C) and Malcolm 8X Gen II (Unertl reproduction). Several of our scopes are used in the CMP Vintage Sniper competition on top of 1903 rifles. Brian Dick ... BDL Ltd. - Specializing in British and Commonwealth weapons Specializing in premium ammunition and reloading components. Your source for the finest in High Power Competition Gear. Here at T-bones Shipwrighting we specialise in vintage service rifle: re-barrelling, bedding, repairs, modifications and accurizing. We also provide importation services for firearms, parts and weapons, for both private or commercial businesses.
     

  3. #2
    FREE MEMBER
    NO Posting or PM's Allowed
    Liftrat's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2009
    Last On
    04-13-2019 @ 01:52 PM
    Posts
    40
    Local Date
    10-31-2024
    Local Time
    07:57 PM
    In determining whether a lockbar is original to a rifle, you might be able to tell by looking at the end of the pinion, where it comes through the windage knob. The originals had the end staked or opened up to prevent the lockbar from coming all the way off. However, it is possible to restake the pinion, so beware. That would be the only way I can think of. As far as rear sight covers, yes, they do often have a slightly different shade of parkerizing, due, in part I believe, to the different heat treatment they underwent. HTH.

  4. Avoid Ads - Become a Contributing Member - Click HERE
  5. #3
    FREE MEMBER
    NO Posting or PM's Allowed
    Kirk's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2009
    Last On
    05-19-2012 @ 03:18 PM
    Location
    Tennessee
    Posts
    550
    Local Date
    10-31-2024
    Local Time
    06:57 PM
    The short answer to your question is no. There is no practical way to determine if any sight has been on a rifle was put there during manufacture. The sights were made as separate parts and maded & finished in batches. Even parts made at the same time may have different colored finishes if they were finished indifferent tanks, in different solutions on different days before they were assembled.

    Scott Duff's book on WWII Garands has a lot of info on lock bar sights the so-called flush nut or type I, type II, type III, etc. The info he presents matches the s/n of rifles to the month they were produced and to a variety of parts, inclusing sights, that would be expected on a rifle produced in any particular month.

    Most Garands were reworked after the war & fitted with the T105E1 sights & modified op rods. Also, many Garands were broken down and reassembled at unit & depot level during & after the was. There was never any concern about returning a particular part to a particular receiver. In that sense, practically every garand is a mixmaster. Still, many Garands show up with the LBs. At the CMPicon, perhaps 2% of the Garands came with LB sights. Since most of these were Greek & Danishicon returns, I would consider these "original" to the rifle, particularly if they were the right type for the s/n. The CMP usually replaced only parts that were worn out or damaged, the probability is very high that these sights had been on the rifle since WWII.

    The whole concept of an "original" Garandicon is a will o' the wisp and descends into philosophy. Unless one can certify that a particular rifle is exactly as it left SA as new production, is it original in the sense that it has all the parts it was originally made with? Will just one part changed out later makes in "not original"? If a rifle had a damaged/worn/obsolete sight or swivel or bolt that was replaced by a GI armorer with one of later vinatge, isn't it still "original" in the sense it meets the Army's definition of a Garand? Is a rifle less "original" if one GI part is replaced with another GI part by a civilian? I know many collectors want "original" rifles & do so by swapping parts. Personally, I consider any Garand used & maintained by the US or it allies as "original" but that rifles with import marks on them as "not original".

  6. #4
    FREE MEMBER
    NO Posting or PM's Allowed
    latigo 1's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2009
    Last On
    01-26-2016 @ 09:44 AM
    Posts
    144
    Local Date
    10-31-2024
    Local Time
    03:57 PM
    Quote Originally Posted by Kirk View Post
    I know many collectors want "original" rifles & do so by swapping parts. Personally, I consider any Garandicon used & maintained by the US or it allies as "original" but that rifles with import marks on them as "not original".
    You can not make an "original" rifle by swapping parts. You can make a "correct" rifle by swapping parts, but a rifle is only original if it still has the exact parts that were on it when it left the factory. A rifle used and maintained by the US that has updated parts is neither "original" or "correct". It is simply a used Garand that has been through a rebuild, commonly known as a "mixmaster".

  7. #5
    FREE MEMBER
    NO Posting or PM's Allowed
    dbarn's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2009
    Last On
    04-05-2017 @ 10:46 PM
    Posts
    412
    Local Date
    10-31-2024
    Local Time
    06:57 PM
    Thread Starter
    Great answers guys, and the discussion is much appreciated. My rifle in question is a Winchester 2.4 million. All parts are correct for this rifle, including the lock bar sight with it's thick apperature. The lighter colored gray sight cover has original finish, but does not have the patina the rest of the receiver has, however wear to the lock bar and elevation knob match the wear to the rifle and stock. Perhaps as suggested, the sight cover did not show patina and wear similar to the receiver due to different heat treatment and finish methods.

  8. #6
    FREE MEMBER
    NO Posting or PM's Allowed
    latigo 1's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2009
    Last On
    01-26-2016 @ 09:44 AM
    Posts
    144
    Local Date
    10-31-2024
    Local Time
    03:57 PM
    Post a pic of the cover to verify it is actually a WRA cover and not from another manufacturer.

  9. #7
    FREE MEMBER
    NO Posting or PM's Allowed
    dbarn's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2009
    Last On
    04-05-2017 @ 10:46 PM
    Posts
    412
    Local Date
    10-31-2024
    Local Time
    06:57 PM
    Thread Starter
    Will do this evening. Thanks.

  10. #8
    Legacy Member islandhopper's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2009
    Last On
    05-25-2020 @ 06:54 PM
    Posts
    90
    Local Date
    10-31-2024
    Local Time
    07:57 PM
    And any other pics of your Winchester would be great. Always like looking at Garandicon rifles!

  11. #9
    FREE MEMBER
    NO Posting or PM's Allowed
    dbarn's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2009
    Last On
    04-05-2017 @ 10:46 PM
    Posts
    412
    Local Date
    10-31-2024
    Local Time
    06:57 PM
    Thread Starter
    Here's the sight cover. Will post a link for more photos.

  12. #10
    FREE MEMBER
    NO Posting or PM's Allowed
    dbarn's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2009
    Last On
    04-05-2017 @ 10:46 PM
    Posts
    412
    Local Date
    10-31-2024
    Local Time
    06:57 PM
    Thread Starter
    A link to additional photos. http://www.fototime.com/inv/75ADCEBF58A0586

+ Reply to Thread
Page 1 of 4 1 2 3 ... LastLast

Similar Threads

  1. SMLE Wire cutters - Originality
    By Peter Laidler in forum The Lee Enfield Knowledge Library Collectors Forum
    Replies: 0
    Last Post: 03-28-2009, 08:46 AM
  2. Korean era SA gas cyl lock screw marking?
    By RBruce in forum M1 Garand/M14/M1A Rifles
    Replies: 2
    Last Post: 03-27-2009, 10:40 AM
  3. Adjusting a lock on a percussion musket
    By Embalmer in forum Black Powder
    Replies: 3
    Last Post: 03-20-2009, 10:49 PM
  4. Handy Garand tip of the Week - Gas Cylinder Lock
    By Mark in Rochester in forum M1 Garand/M14/M1A Picture of the Day Forum
    Replies: 3
    Last Post: 03-20-2009, 12:49 PM

Tags for this Thread

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts