+ Reply to Thread
Page 1 of 2 1 2 LastLast
Results 1 to 10 of 12

Thread: 1853 enfield curiousity....

Click here to increase the font size Click here to reduce the font size

Hybrid View

  1. #1
    Legacy Member Embalmer's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2009
    Last On
    05-04-2024 @ 06:05 PM
    Location
    North Shore Mass
    Posts
    190
    Local Date
    05-20-2024
    Local Time
    04:41 PM

    1853 enfield curiousity....

    Anyone else fire a 53 enfield live?? I fire my 61, 63 springfield alot, as well as my 1859 sharps (all repros) and when firing they all seem to fire pretty straight. But the enfield, seems to have a big arch upto the first 50 yards before straighting out. Anyone else notice such a behavior with them??
    Information
    Warning: This is a relatively older thread
    This discussion is older than 360 days. Some information contained in it may no longer be current.

  2. #2
    FREE MEMBER
    NO Posting or PM's Allowed
    A. F Medic's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2009
    Last On
    07-10-2019 @ 05:44 PM
    Location
    Erie Pa
    Posts
    1,141
    Local Date
    05-20-2024
    Local Time
    05:41 PM

    Arc

    Quote Originally Posted by Matt Wolff View Post
    Anyone else fire a 53 enfield live?? I fire my 61, 63 springfield alot, as well as my 1859 sharps (all repros) and when firing they all seem to fire pretty straight. But the enfield, seems to have a big arch upto the first 50 yards before straighting out. Anyone else notice such a behavior with them??
    I am certainly no expert on that but I have a Parker Hale 1858 that was driving me nuts! At 25 yards, consistant hitting in the black. At 100 yards the minnie ball dropped a foot or more.

    Tried different powder charges up and down but little change. Finally went to a custom minnie ball and kept the charges around 60 grains. The bullet still dropped but hit consistent at 100 yards.

    My next step to happen is that I am going to have to shave the front sight down very little at a time. That should bring the impact up but I was also told by a Civil War reenactor that the Enfield was sensitive to face placement on the stock. Much like the release point on a bow on your chin or side of your lip.

    Have not done that yet but will try consistent face placement on the stock and then work with a file on the front sight.

    It is very possible that your arch is normal for the weapon as all bullets from any weapon do have a curve. You are firing a 500 grain bullet and it may need that arc to have the bottom part of the arc to coincide with your target.

    If there are any other ideas out there, I would like to hear about them.

  3. Avoid Ads - Become a Contributing Member - Click HERE
  4. #3
    Legacy Member Embalmer's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2009
    Last On
    05-04-2024 @ 06:05 PM
    Location
    North Shore Mass
    Posts
    190
    Local Date
    05-20-2024
    Local Time
    04:41 PM
    Thread Starter
    I know theres supposed to be some arch, but compared to the springfield and sharps, its like almost2-3X of it.

  5. #4
    FREE MEMBER
    NO Posting or PM's Allowed
    langoley's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2010
    Last On
    11-16-2012 @ 06:44 AM
    Posts
    1
    Local Date
    05-20-2024
    Local Time
    04:41 PM
    Rapine makes a 315 wadcutter mold that shoots great in either the enfield or the springfield!!Start out at 35-40 gr. of 3fffg.

  6. #5
    FREE MEMBER
    NO Posting or PM's Allowed
    TA6319's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2010
    Last On
    07-07-2017 @ 04:55 PM
    Location
    UK
    Posts
    13
    Local Date
    05-20-2024
    Local Time
    10:41 PM
    I tried someones p53 at 50m loaded with 2 1/4 drams of course black powder it shot high. When we tried 1 dram it shot slightly left of centre.
    Another member who was near at the time who shoots one a lot said he uses 1 dram for upto 100m. Bear in mind these where designed to be used at a lot longer distances, hence the heavier powder loads

  7. #6
    Legacy Member Jim's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2007
    Last On
    06-04-2020 @ 06:12 PM
    Location
    Texas
    Posts
    185
    Local Date
    05-20-2024
    Local Time
    04:41 PM
    Quote Originally Posted by TA6319 View Post
    I tried someones p53 at 50m loaded with 2 1/4 drams of course black powder it shot high. When we tried 1 dram it shot slightly left of centre.
    Another member who was near at the time who shoots one a lot said he uses 1 dram for up to 100m. Bear in mind these where designed to be used at a lot longer distances, hence the heavier powder loads
    I'm not familiar with metric measures so can't say how "dram" compares to "grains," but original War Between the States loadings were not high at all averaging between 65-70 grains ffg black powder. Excess powder is wasteful and creates more fouling. In target shooting, I generally used 70gr ffg black powder. That was not with an original however. I have a first generation Parker~Hale repro. I have heard it said these are about as close to original as can be had in a repro. I cannot swear that this is correct though. But to return to the subject, I too experienced a high arch having to hold 8"-10" low at about 50 yards with it being pretty much spot on at 100. I have not had many opportunities to shoot at greater ranges but the poi held pretty true to sight adjustments out to 300 yards (I couldn't actually create a 'group' at 300yd/m but most of the shots at least hit the paper.)

  8. #7
    FREE MEMBER
    NO Posting or PM's Allowed
    Smokey60's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2009
    Last On
    11-29-2010 @ 12:03 PM
    Location
    Virginia
    Age
    75
    Posts
    5
    Local Date
    05-20-2024
    Local Time
    04:41 PM
    I have a 53 model Parker Hale and I have no troubles dropping a whitetail at 100 yards. Rounds go where aimed. I use 60 grains of ffg Goex powder and a .58 cal Minie ball.

  9. #8
    FREE MEMBER
    NO Posting or PM's Allowed
    TA6319's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2010
    Last On
    07-07-2017 @ 04:55 PM
    Location
    UK
    Posts
    13
    Local Date
    05-20-2024
    Local Time
    10:41 PM
    Quote Originally Posted by Jim View Post
    [/B] I'm not familiar with metric measures so can't say how "dram" compares to "grains," but original War Between the States loadings were not high at all averaging between 65-70 grains ffg black powder. Excess powder is wasteful and creates more fouling. In target shooting, I generally used 70gr ffg black powder. That was not with an original however. I have a first generation Parker~Hale repro. I have heard it said these are about as close to original as can be had in a repro. I cannot swear that this is correct though. But to return to the subject, I too experienced a high arch having to hold 8"-10" low at about 50 yards with it being pretty much spot on at 100. I have not had many opportunities to shoot at greater ranges but the poi held pretty true to sight adjustments out to 300 yards (I couldn't actually create a 'group' at 300yd/m but most of the shots at least hit the paper.)

    1 dram = 27.3 or 27.6 grains I cant remember which

  10. #9
    FREE MEMBER
    NO Posting or PM's Allowed
    conductor's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2009
    Last On
    12-01-2013 @ 08:17 PM
    Location
    Loudoun County, Virginia
    Posts
    94
    Local Date
    05-20-2024
    Local Time
    04:41 PM
    Quote Originally Posted by Jim View Post
    [/B] I'm not familiar with metric measures so can't say how "dram" compares to "grains," but original War Between the States loadings were not high at all averaging between 65-70 grains ffg black powder. Excess powder is wasteful and creates more fouling. In target shooting, I generally used 70gr ffg black powder. That was not with an original however. I have a first generation Parker~Hale repro. I have heard it said these are about as close to original as can be had in a repro. I cannot swear that this is correct though. But to return to the subject, I too experienced a high arch having to hold 8"-10" low at about 50 yards with it being pretty much spot on at 100. I have not had many opportunities to shoot at greater ranges but the poi held pretty true to sight adjustments out to 300 yards (I couldn't actually create a 'group' at 300yd/m but most of the shots at least hit the paper.)
    Wow! 70 grains of FFg in a Parker-Hale!? I shoot a 1970s vintage Parker-Hale in N-SSA competition, and use 44 grains of Goex FFg behind a Lyman 575213 Old Style minie. I can get 4 inch groups at 100 yards from a rest. When I go up to the standard Civil War load of 60 grains, the group opens up to about 6 inches, and the recoil in much more noticable. Unless you're using it for hunting, you might try reducing your load a bit.

  11. #10
    FREE MEMBER
    NO Posting or PM's Allowed
    A. F Medic's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2009
    Last On
    07-10-2019 @ 05:44 PM
    Location
    Erie Pa
    Posts
    1,141
    Local Date
    05-20-2024
    Local Time
    05:41 PM

    1858 Parker Hale repro

    Quote Originally Posted by Smokey60 View Post
    I have a 53 model Parker Hale and I have no troubles dropping a whitetail at 100 yards. Rounds go where aimed. I use 60 grains of ffg Goex powder and a .58 cal Minie ball.
    I too have a PH in .58cal. (.577) I experienced some of the same problems mentioned. SN 2203.

    I removed the barrel and it has 2 1/4 drams of black powder. I do not know if that is max or reccomended.

    Anyways, I ordered a bunch of bullets of different types from a man who makes them and also swags them. I do not have the name handy but can get it.

    At twenty five yards, the bullets are crowding the same hole. At fifty, there is a slight climb. At one hundred yards, I have a one to three foot drop. I had to put extra paper on the target frame to find the low impact holes.

    I believe that I was using the 2 1/4 drams or 61 grains of two F. Prodex

    The I tried more powder up to 90 grains but all I got was a sore shoulder off the rest. Then I tried cutting back the powder (military load) but I do not believe there was much change.

    My rifle looks like it has a different front sight maybe put on by the original owner . It does look high.

    I am now going to stick with the 60 grains and will try filing the sight down a tad at a time. I will let the forum know how it goes. I am going to use the Minie Ball .

    I may go to straight black powder as that was what the weapon was designed for.

    If it is sensitive to cheek placement, I am going to try one placement position and try to keep it that way. I have not used the rifle during Pa's deer season as I did not want to wound a deer since it is very hard to track them in the red fall foilage.

    If you need a conversion table for anything, please keep this site handy...

    http://www.convert-me.com/en/

+ Reply to Thread
Page 1 of 2 1 2 LastLast

Similar Threads

  1. Replies: 3
    Last Post: 01-17-2010, 01:00 PM
  2. 1924 ShtLE (Short Lee-Enfield) No.1 MkV Rifle (Mfg by RSAF Enfield)
    By Badger in forum The Lee Enfield Knowledge Library Collectors Forum
    Replies: 0
    Last Post: 04-07-2007, 12:12 PM

Tags for this Thread

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts