-
Legacy Member
1915 No.1 Mk3*
Found it yesterday at my local gun store - all matching and in good condition and will clean up most splendidly - has a bantam buttstock though. Definitely 1915 dated - definitely an Mk3 * with no slot for cut off in the receiver though the wood is cut away for it. I thought the * came in in 1916 or 1917??
Information
|
Warning: This is a relatively older thread This discussion is older than 360 days. Some information contained in it may no longer be current. |
|
-
-
04-30-2015 11:28 AM
# ADS
Friends and Sponsors
-
Advisory Panel
-
-
-
Legacy Member
Not yet - ten days before I can get it after the background check runs. Serial is Y 601XX as far as I remember. No FTR marks at all
.
-
Thank You to newcastle For This Useful Post:
-
Legacy Member
I have a few of those, 2 Enfield and 1 BSA. I always thought they were an interesting anomaly for 1915 as that is the only year you will find both Enfield and BSA producing the Mk.III and III*. I started a thread a while ago to see if we could figure out when in 1915 the Mk.III* began but It was short lived as I was reminded of the overlapping production number sequence having run through the alphabet a few times making such a task futile. Does your forestock have the depression where the volley sight was to be fitted?
-
-
Contributing Member
BSA changed sometime in 1916. I have a 1916 dated MkIII and MkIII*.
-
-
Legacy Member
Took a couple of pics today. It's a BSA. Wood IS inletted for volley sight front and rear on the left side. Will post the pics later.
-
-
Legacy Member
Here we go. Receiver. BSA 1915, No.1Mk3* no slot for cutoff, inletted for volley sights rear and fore.
Attachment 62388Attachment 62389Attachment 62390Attachment 62391Attachment 62392
-
The Following 3 Members Say Thank You to newcastle For This Useful Post:
-
Legacy Member
Skennerton says BSA removed the magazine cut-off in September 1915, and although they had the OK to do this from the War Office, apparently the small arms inspectors hadn't been advised and threatened to fail the rifles.
BSA got told off rather sternly for being naughty and had to go back to making the rifles with the cut-offs for a short time until the change to Mk III* was approved in January 1916.
-
-
Legacy Member
Obviously the final machining operations for voley sights were not completed, so I wouldn't call this inletted for volley sights.
-