+ Reply to Thread
Page 1 of 2 1 2 LastLast
Results 1 to 10 of 17

Thread: BREN Gun versus B.A.R. (Video)

Click here to increase the font size Click here to reduce the font size

Hybrid View

  1. #1
    Administrator

    Site Owner
    Badger's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2006
    Last On
    @
    Location
    Toronto, Canada
    Age
    76
    Posts
    12,951
    Real Name
    Doug
    Local Date
    06-01-2024
    Local Time
    03:42 AM
    My Videos in Video Club
    12

    Arrow BREN Gun versus B.A.R. (Video)

    Information
    Warning: This is a relatively older thread
    This discussion is older than 360 days. Some information contained in it may no longer be current.

  2. #2
    Legacy Member gravityfan's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2008
    Last On
    Today @ 12:14 AM
    Location
    Portland, OR
    Posts
    74
    Local Date
    06-01-2024
    Local Time
    12:42 AM
    My immediate thoughts:

    - It says Bren MkI, but isn't that a MkII?
    - Never seen anyone hold a Bren with the left hand on the carry handle folded out and swivelled left.
    - Don't know about the BAR, but the test was a bit hokey. The Bren is a crew-served weapon in its normal mode. I'd have liked to see a comparison with them both used in their normal operational mode.

    Like I said, just my immediate reactions on seeing it for the first time.


    Happy new year, one and all. Hope 2011 is a good one!
    Last edited by gravityfan; 01-01-2011 at 03:11 AM.

  3. Avoid Ads - Become a Contributing Member - Click HERE
  4. #3
    Legacy Member tankhunter's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2010
    Last On
    06-28-2023 @ 05:15 PM
    Location
    UK
    Posts
    1,054
    Real Name
    Mike
    Local Date
    06-01-2024
    Local Time
    02:42 AM
    The 'Gunner' was an Ex U.S Marine & trained with the B.A.R is Service. He had probably never handled a Bren before. This 'Test' was obviously biased in favour of the B.A.R.
    I believe the .30" Cal round was more powerfull though. But lack of controlability in this comparisson was self evident. Any weapon of this weight from the hip would be wastefull of ammo.

  5. #4
    Advisory Panel
    Peter Laidler's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2008
    Last On
    Yesterday @ 05:25 AM
    Location
    Abingdon, Oxfordshire. The home of MG Cars
    Posts
    16,527
    Real Name
    Peter Laidler
    Local Date
    06-01-2024
    Local Time
    08:42 AM
    The Bren carrying handle folded outwards was a feature to be used for controlability in the AA role, from the AA tripod. It was not meant or designed to be used as a front grip for use in the fire and movement/from the hip role. This is a myth. For that, you used the folded bipod legs with the butt tucked under the arm, resting on the ammo pouches.

    The notion that you would use the extended carrying handle to fire from the hip is the stuff oof fiction....... or nightmares. Just TRY using the carrying handle that way and within about 5 seconds you'll begin to feel the whole 19 pounde weight pulling your left arm out of the socket.

    Just my two pence worth........ But I could be wrong having fired one once........ (sorry, just being silly there!)

  6. The Following 3 Members Say Thank You to Peter Laidler For This Useful Post:


  7. #5
    FREE MEMBER
    NO Posting or PM's Allowed
    private ryan's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2010
    Last On
    06-10-2012 @ 12:04 AM
    Posts
    3
    Local Date
    06-01-2024
    Local Time
    03:42 AM
    I have fired the Bren in 303 and 7.62 Royal Anglian Regiment ACF 1968 -1972.
    From prone, standing, and from the top of a 432 APC.
    We were taught to hold the Bren using the sling and holding the bipod clear of gas vent.
    I would imagine holding the carry handle would effect accuracy a bit.

  8. #6
    FREE MEMBER
    NO Posting or PM's Allowed
    Groupie's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2011
    Last On
    04-08-2013 @ 05:57 PM
    Location
    NC USA
    Posts
    22
    Local Date
    06-01-2024
    Local Time
    03:42 AM

    Bar vs bren

    Having 2 BARs and 2 Brens, I'd suggest a 3rd competitor, the Johnson 1941 LMG. On any giving day with varing ammo targets ranges and tarain I think each is the BEST depending on the afore mentioned variables. I never shot them all side by side, but thought the FN D super with cast lead lower velocity bullets for accuracy and control, but at shorter range and larger targets the 1918A2 with military ammo was better. For short range controled full magazine emptying fire I liked the '41 Johnson. For bipod firing prone use I like the Brens. So why not a total comparison ? No longer have a Van, ranges are scarce and avialiable time is not what it used ot be. I have many guns I've never got to shoot. Such is life as the Frenchicon say, but hope is eternal and there's always other days. Hope this was in some way worth the reading ?

  9. #7
    Legacy Member DOD 7.62's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2012
    Last On
    01-12-2022 @ 02:34 AM
    Location
    Australia
    Posts
    30
    Local Date
    06-01-2024
    Local Time
    05:42 PM
    Hi Peter, I'm new to the forum and was reading this post, reading your comment about the barrel handle being used for hip firing being a myth prompted a memory of something I'd read. I have a copy of an Australianicon 'User Handbook for the .303 Inch Bren Gun MKS 1,2,2/1,3 & 4 and 7.62mm Bren L4A1 to L4A7' Prepared and printed by INSPECTORATE OF ARMAMENTS WOOLWICH June 1969 MP159 RESTRICTED. On page 5 under the heading 'Barrel Assembly' 12. Barrel Mk1* it states the following;

    "Two barrels are supplied with each gun to allow for changing in the event of overheating. A handle is attached to the barrel for carrying the gun or for use when changing barrels. During firing, the handle lies along the left side of the gun but may be set at right angles and securely locked to the body of the gun for use when firing from the hip."

    Can't say I've ever tried it myself and have no idea what the official training protocol was for Australian troops but I though you might find this interesting as it seems to be an official reference to that exact purpose of use.

    Really enjoying the forum,

    Regards,

    DOD

  10. #8
    Contributing Member csmarcher's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2008
    Last On
    05-29-2024 @ 02:00 AM
    Location
    In the shed
    Posts
    119
    Real Name
    Gary
    Local Date
    05-31-2024
    Local Time
    11:42 PM
    The only time I've ever used it in the outwardly folded roll is in conjunction with the sling over my shoulder. It does balance well and you can change mags on the run as long as you're not fussy where you sling the empty...........
    The greatest LMG to ever see service in the British Army...........................

  11. #9
    Advisory Panel
    Peter Laidler's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2008
    Last On
    Yesterday @ 05:25 AM
    Location
    Abingdon, Oxfordshire. The home of MG Cars
    Posts
    16,527
    Real Name
    Peter Laidler
    Local Date
    06-01-2024
    Local Time
    08:42 AM
    The UKicon did trial the BAR and a 'Superintendent of Design' modified variant of it during the lengthy LMG acceptance trials in the early to mid 30's. The SofD version got a bit further than the standard BAR but even then, the opinion was that while the BAR was good, it was just that..., a heavy rifle. What was needed was a true light machine gun. Not the same thing................ The rest, as they say, is history and entered both legend and folklore as the finest machine gun ever put into the hands of a soldier

    The same applied to the L2 rifle. It was just a heavy rifle and not an LMG........... same as the SA80 LSW and dare I say it, the RPK. Good rifles but alas, not good machine gunbs. Just boys trying to do a mans job

  12. #10
    Advisory Panel Brian Dick's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2008
    Last On
    Yesterday @ 03:39 PM
    Location
    Edgefield, SC USA
    Posts
    4,056
    Local Date
    06-01-2024
    Local Time
    03:42 AM
    I agree with Peter. The quick change barrel means everything in the LMG role. The BAR is a good weapon but comparison is apples and oranges. The L2 and M14icon in the SAW role had the same drawbacks as the BAR.

+ Reply to Thread
Page 1 of 2 1 2 LastLast

Similar Threads

  1. 2 versus 5 groove barrel
    By w8lftr in forum The Lee Enfield Knowledge Library Collectors Forum
    Replies: 7
    Last Post: 09-08-2010, 11:38 AM
  2. Blanks versus ballistite
    By RJW NZ in forum The Lee Enfield Knowledge Library Collectors Forum
    Replies: 6
    Last Post: 04-05-2010, 10:51 PM
  3. MK1 versus MK2 Forend questions
    By ralfus in forum The Lee Enfield Knowledge Library Collectors Forum
    Replies: 1
    Last Post: 07-14-2009, 02:10 PM
  4. No. 5 versus No. 4 - relative accuracy
    By Patrick Chadwick in forum The Lee Enfield Knowledge Library Collectors Forum
    Replies: 7
    Last Post: 03-10-2009, 09:06 AM
  5. Clips versus Magazines
    By Badger in forum The Screening Room
    Replies: 0
    Last Post: 08-22-2007, 11:45 AM

Tags for this Thread

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts