I don't like the look of that stock cartouche...Information
Warning: This is a relatively older thread
This discussion is older than 360 days. Some information contained in it may no longer be current.
I don't like the look of that stock cartouche...Information
Warning: This is a relatively older thread
This discussion is older than 360 days. Some information contained in it may no longer be current.
guys chime in. Where is the DCM or CMP letter? None even mentioned in his ad. Rather let some1 with more expertise than me in M1C's pronounce this 1 real or not.Hairs on the back of my neck raising,on the description of the mount, and the cartouche. no where does it say it is a G&H mount, just correctly machined, is this a case of legal doublespeak, with no recourse to buyer?
da gimp
OFC, Mo. Chapter
over the years as "M1C" receivers, I'd really like Scott Duff or one of the guys to take a hard look @ this before I spent that kinda money for it.The money I would spend for a "restored/built M1C" would be considerably less than for one of the originals. The wording in his ad makes me uneasy. It's almost like it was worded by an attorney to say & not say the mount is an original G&H@ the same time.
Maybe I'm overcautious, but not with my money.
da gimp
OFC, Mo. chapter
Way too few pictures and too sparse a description for a big ticket item.
The buttstock seems to be in question. I for one would like to know why the cheekpad is detached? Was it ever installed?
Regards,
Jim
Thanks everyone. I have not yet heard back from the seller on further pictures and information. Appreciate the comments and advice, I will steer clear for awhile. Just blew most of my money on a 1918a3 Ohio Ord. BAR anyway! Thanks again.