+ Reply to Thread
Results 1 to 8 of 8

Thread: Fighting on Guadalcanal 1943....

Click here to increase the font size Click here to reduce the font size
  1. #1
    FREE MEMBER
    NO Posting or PM's Allowed
    A. F Medic's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2009
    Last On
    07-10-2019 @ 05:44 PM
    Location
    Erie Pa
    Posts
    1,141
    Local Date
    05-12-2024
    Local Time
    08:12 PM

    Fighting on Guadalcanal 1943....

    In a box of books and old Field Manuals from WWll I found a small book put out by the US War Office. Titled: Restricted. Fighting on Guadalcanal.

    The book was approved by Chief of Staff Marshall and the Generals of the US Army and the Marine Corp.

    It appears that the book was done after many interviews of some of the soldiers, Marines, NCOs, and commanding officers. The idea was not to redo mistakes made and improve the fighting men.

    Some of the solutions put forth were to have a knee mortar like the Japs since their mortar could be set up quickly, produce high volumes of accurate fire, and the shell could be used like a hand grenade. We had cumbersome mortars and the shell could not be used like a grenade. We needed one like that.

    Another request was to take the yellow band off the US grenade as when it was thrown, the Japs could see the grenade laying on the ground and toss it back!

    The M1icon was mentioned as being a fine rifle but the gas tube was bright and shiny and a dead giveaway for the Japs.

    What I found most interesting was a statement from Colonel Amor Le R. Sims. Commanding officer, Seventh Marines, 1st Marine Division.
    He said, "I wish we had the M1 rifle, and when we get relieved from Guadalcanal, I am going to make every effort to get it." End of Quote....
    Information
    Warning: This is a relatively older thread
    This discussion is older than 360 days. Some information contained in it may no longer be current.

  2. # ADS
    Friends and Sponsors
    Join Date
    October 2006
    Location
    Milsurps.Com
    Posts
    All Threads
    A Collector's View - The SMLE Short Magazine Lee Enfield 1903-1989. It is 300 8.5x11 inch pages with 1,000+ photo’s, most in color, and each book is serial-numbered.  Covering the SMLE from 1903 to the end of production in India in 1989 it looks at how each model differs and manufacturer differences from a collecting point of view along with the major accessories that could be attached to the rifle. For the record this is not a moneymaker, I hope just to break even, eventually, at $80/book plus shipping.  In the USA shipping is $5.00 for media mail.  I will accept PayPal, Zelle, MO and good old checks (and cash if you want to stop by for a tour!).  CLICK BANNER to send me a PM for International pricing and shipping. Manufacturer of various vintage rifle scopes for the 1903 such as our M73G4 (reproduction of the Weaver 330C) and Malcolm 8X Gen II (Unertl reproduction). Several of our scopes are used in the CMP Vintage Sniper competition on top of 1903 rifles. Brian Dick ... BDL Ltd. - Specializing in British and Commonwealth weapons Specializing in premium ammunition and reloading components. Your source for the finest in High Power Competition Gear. Here at T-bones Shipwrighting we specialise in vintage service rifle: re-barrelling, bedding, repairs, modifications and accurizing. We also provide importation services for firearms, parts and weapons, for both private or commercial businesses.
     

  3. #2
    FREE MEMBER
    NO Posting or PM's Allowed
    The Queens Medalist 86,87's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2006
    Last On
    04-24-2016 @ 11:10 AM
    Posts
    45
    Local Date
    05-12-2024
    Local Time
    08:12 PM
    I read a couple books on that several month battle. In the begining at the airfield, the Japaneseicon had a lot of opportunities to exploit American initial weak defences. The Japanese infantry known for excellent night patrols, would often get to American aircraft deep within defence perimeter, and set off several charges on a few American parked aircraft or even just one. While ignoring just as available ammo and large fuel dumps, that would have been a huge victory, and would have helped for a large victorious counter attack. Made as much sense as Japanese sword led open sectional attacks on well entreched Mg defended US troops, on a nightly basis. Then came starvation too.
    No wonder the Japanese army was defeated at Guadalcanal!

  4. Avoid Ads - Become a Contributing Member - Click HERE
  5. #3
    FREE MEMBER
    NO Posting or PM's Allowed
    A. F Medic's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2009
    Last On
    07-10-2019 @ 05:44 PM
    Location
    Erie Pa
    Posts
    1,141
    Local Date
    05-12-2024
    Local Time
    08:12 PM
    Thread Starter
    I am not a battle tactics expert but what I read in the book was along the lines of what you said.
    It appears from the book that the Japaneseicon had a very strict line of command ( Code of Battle) and they were not allowed to deviate from the original battle plan.
    The book mentions that it was better to take out the NCOs and the officers and the Japanese soldiers would become confused about what to do and when.
    I am sure that there were exceptions within the Japanese army but we learned to use their battle tactics against them. Acknowledged (in the book) that the Jap was a fanatical fighter and dedicated to die for the Emperor. Even in mass wave attacks!

    Major General Vandegrift, Commanding General of the First Marines Division said, "For for this type of warfare we need to go back to the tactics of the Frenchicon and Indian days. I am referring to the tactics and leadership of the days of ROGERS'S RANGERS".

  6. #4
    FREE MEMBER
    NO Posting or PM's Allowed
    Pattern14's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2009
    Last On
    05-15-2015 @ 05:17 PM
    Location
    Harrisburg, Pennsylvania
    Posts
    210
    Local Date
    05-12-2024
    Local Time
    08:12 PM
    Quote Originally Posted by A. F Medic View Post
    The book mentions that it was better to take out the NCOs and the officers and the Japaneseicon soldiers would become confused about what to do and when.
    That is true. Japanese soldiers would not take initiative and relied on orders from superiors. The one exception was designated snipers who would silently remain in a tree top or other camouflaged positions for long periods until they selected a target. My dad was a Marine Combat Engineer on Guadalcanal and was part of a battalion repairing and maintaining the runway at Henderson Field. He told me of a "banana tree" that seemed to move slowly closer to his unit until a Marine decided to pick it off.

  7. #5
    FREE MEMBER
    NO Posting or PM's Allowed
    kr6ng's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2009
    Last On
    05-02-2011 @ 10:16 AM
    Location
    Acworth,GA
    Posts
    56
    Local Date
    05-12-2024
    Local Time
    08:12 PM

    Guadalcanal

    I spent yesterday visiting a terminally ill Marine corps vveteran of the battle of Guadalcanal and Okinawa. One of his statements was " the Japaneseicon invented jungle warfare" I will really miss him when he is gone
    Russ

  8. #6
    Banned Edward Horton's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2008
    Last On
    09-10-2011 @ 01:42 PM
    Location
    Harrisburg, PA USA
    Age
    73
    Posts
    935
    Local Date
    05-12-2024
    Local Time
    08:12 PM
    “What I found most interesting was a statement from Colonel Amor Le R. Sims. Commanding officer, Seventh Marines, 1st Marine Division.
    He said, "I wish we had the M1icon rifle, and when we get relieved from Guadalcanal, I am going to make every effort to get it." End of Quote....”


    When the Marines landed on Guadalcanal they were armed with 03 Springfield’s, when the Marines left Guadalcanal thousands of Marines were fined $37.50 for loosing their 03 Springfield in combat.

    They were fined $37.50 because the serial number on the M1 they were carrying matched serial numbers of missing M1s from U.S. Army storage sites on the island…………

    These Marines “perfected jungle warfare” and perfected “Improvise, Adapt and Overcome”
    (And didn’t need a General to tell them they needed more firepower)


    My father was a Navy Chief and when I was in grade school we lived next door to a Marine Master Gunnery Sergeant who had served with Chesty Puller on Guadalcanal. Unfortunately since my father was a “swabbie” I always had to be a Jap when I played with his kids.

    The sad part was I have been killed on every Pacific island the Marines were ever on during the war.





    Reising Gun

    The Reising gun was designed and developed by noted gun inventor Eugene Reising. It was patented in 1940 and manufactured by the old gun-making firm of Harrington and Richardson of Worcester, Massachusetts. It is said that it was made on existing machine tools, some dating back to the Civil War, and of ordinary steel rather than ordnance steel. With new machine tools and ordnance steel scarce and needed for more demanding weapons, the Reising met an immediate requirement for many sub-machine guns at a time when production of Thompson M1928 and M1 sub-machine guns hadn't caught up with demand and the stamped-out M3 "grease gun" had not yet been invented. It was a wartime expedient.

    The Reising was made in two different models, the 50 and the 55. The Model 50 had a full wooden stock and a Cutts compensator attached to the muzzle. The compensator, a device which reduced the upward muzzle climb from recoil, was invented by Richard M. Cutts, Sr., and his son, Richard M. Cutts, Jr., both of whom became Marine brigadier generals. The other version was dubbed the Model 55. It had a folding metal-wire shoulder stock which swivelled on the wooded pistol grip. It also had a shorter barrel and no compensator. It was intended for use by parachutists, tank crews, and others needing a compact weapon. Both versions of the Reising fired .45-caliber ammunition, the same cartridge as the Colt automatic pistol and the Thompson.

    In all, there were approximately 100,000 Reising sub-machine guns produced between 1940 and 1942. Small numbers of the weapons were acquired by both Great Britainicon and the Sovieticon Union. However, most were used by the U.S. Marine Corps in the Solomon Islands campaign. The Model 55 was issued to both Marine parachute battalions and Marine raiders, seeing service first on Guadalcanal. After its dubious debut in combat it was withdrawn from frontline service in 1943 due to several flaws in design and manufacture.

    The Reising's major shortcoming was its propensity for jamming. This was due to both a design problem in the magazine lips and the fact that magazines were made of a soft sheet steel. The weapons' safety mechanism didn't always work and if the butt was slammed down on the deck, the hammer would set back against the mainspring and then fly forward, firing a chambered cartridge. The design allowed the entry of dirt into the mechanism and close tolerances caused it to jam. Finally, the steel used allowed excessive rust to form in the tropical humidity of the Solomons. Nevertheless, at six pounds, the Reising was handier than the 10-pound Thompson, more accurate, pleasanter to shoot, and reliable under other than combat conditions, but one always had to keep the muzzle pointed in a safe direction.

  9. #7
    Legacy Member emmagee1917's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2009
    Last On
    11-27-2022 @ 11:10 AM
    Location
    Yuma , Arizona
    Posts
    1,402
    Local Date
    05-12-2024
    Local Time
    05:12 PM

    Red face Hummm....

    ....That reising article has more mis-information and errors than an obama press release.
    Chris

  10. #8
    FREE MEMBER
    NO Posting or PM's Allowed
    katooutdoors's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2008
    Last On
    04-15-2010 @ 09:51 PM
    Posts
    6
    Local Date
    05-12-2024
    Local Time
    08:12 PM

    Arrow

    Once the Officers had realized all the flaws and the unreliability associated with the Reising, there were large amounts that were dumped overboard and the troops were issued different rifles before heading into the next combat zone.
    It didn't take the Officers and N.C.O.'s too long to figure out that those Reisings were nothing but junk.


+ Reply to Thread

Similar Threads

  1. Fighting knives in Canada?
    By sdh1911 in forum Milsurps General Discussion Forum
    Replies: 0
    Last Post: 12-31-2006, 11:09 AM

Tags for this Thread

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts