+ Reply to Thread
Results 1 to 10 of 42

Thread: No4 Sniper rifle/Armourer's Bipod

Click here to increase the font size Click here to reduce the font size

Hybrid View

  1. #1
    Legacy Member Sentryduty's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2015
    Last On
    02-07-2022 @ 11:09 AM
    Location
    Edmonton, AB, Canada
    Posts
    1,057
    Real Name
    Darren
    Local Date
    05-21-2024
    Local Time
    07:43 AM
    Quote Originally Posted by Peter Laidlericon View Post
    But even the FG42 had a different MPI when fired off the bipod.
    Absolutely it would, another example, the VZ58 (CZ858 etc) has a service issued bipod that clips on the bayonet lug, and for the MPI shifts by a vast amount when using it. It's to the point where the shift between bipod and no-bipod requires re-regulation of the sights.



    I know we could bang on about this for days, but the best thing for a barrel is to leave it alone to work as a barrel and not serve as an attachment point for hardware and Christmas decorations.
    Information
    Warning: This is a relatively older thread
    This discussion is older than 360 days. Some information contained in it may no longer be current.
    - Darren
    1 PL West Nova Scotia Regiment 2000-2003
    1 BN Princess Patricia's Canadian Light Infantry 2003-2013

  2. The Following 2 Members Say Thank You to Sentryduty For This Useful Post:


+ Reply to Thread

Similar Threads

  1. An Armourer's Perspective: .303 No. 4 (T) Sniper Rifle and the H&H Connection
    By mjolnir2 in forum The Lee Enfield Knowledge Library Collectors Forum
    Replies: 23
    Last Post: 03-01-2015, 05:45 AM
  2. M14 rifle/M2 bipod failure
    By jmoore in forum M1 Garand/M14/M1A Rifles
    Replies: 11
    Last Post: 02-08-2010, 03:03 AM

Tags for this Thread

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts