-
Legacy Member
1941 BSA
Hello all.
A question: are there 1941 No. 4 Mk I BSA converted to sniper?
Information
|
Warning: This is a relatively older thread This discussion is older than 360 days. Some information contained in it may no longer be current. |
|
-
-
10-29-2017 02:08 PM
# ADS
Friends and Sponsors
-
Yes. I have owned several, & still have one. They bear the early BSA marking & the date: 'B1941' & lack the typical markings, although they do usually have the S51 on the butt.
-
The Following 3 Members Say Thank You to Roger Payne For This Useful Post:
-
-
BSA 1941 4T
Here it is. I knew I had a photo of it stored somewhere......in fact I posted it on here a few weeks ago for an entirely different reason.
Incidentally these early UK (BSA, Maltby & the odd Faz) were stocked up in beech. This is quite correct.
Hope this helps.....
-
Thank You to Roger Payne For This Useful Post:
-
Legacy Member
Thank you Roger.
I think I have one too; even after seeing the photo you entered, I am sure.
Serial number has A suffix amd, the rifle, has the S51 code.
As soon as I can, I'll put some photos.
Thank you again.
-
Thank You to Giove For This Useful Post:
-
I'd love to see photo's of your rifle giove. One doesn't often see photo's of these early BSA rifles, yet Maltbys & Savages are quite well documented, as are later 'run of production' BSA's of 43 to 45 manufacture.
Last edited by Roger Payne; 10-30-2017 at 11:42 AM.
-
-
Legacy Member
Some photos.
The rifle is all matching. The scope is a mismatched Mark II.
The stoch is beech and is a bit sanded.
To notice: the magazine is the No. 4 (magazine, not rifle) of an SMLE, but has the follower af a No. 4 rifle magazine. It fit perfectly.
-
Thank You to Giove For This Useful Post:
-
Thanks giove. It's exactly like all of the others I've seen, & probably one of the very early H&H conversions. The radius on the 'shoulders' either side of the front pad spigot is more generously rounded on the early conversions, & the pad screws being unstaked is also the norm from the ones I've seen, as is the waisted foresight protector. The sight protector will probably be marked SM 41 somewhere on it.
Thanks for sharing.
-
-
Legacy Member
Thank you Roger.
Yes, the sight protector is marked SM 41 on the front.
What about the magazine?
-
-
Contributing Member
The magazine is incorrect, and is for a SMLE MkIII. That's easily remedied by finding a correct No.4 magazine.
Otherwise, very nice rifle!
-
Thank You to smle addict For This Useful Post:
-
Just as the man said.....
-