+ Reply to Thread
Page 2 of 2 FirstFirst 1 2
Results 11 to 18 of 18

Thread: PARAS & ROYAL MARINES TO MERGE??

Click here to increase the font size Click here to reduce the font size
  1. #11
    Contributing Member mrclark303's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2012
    Last On
    Today @ 08:59 AM
    Location
    The wild west of England
    Posts
    2,693
    Local Date
    05-27-2020
    Local Time
    02:41 PM
    Real Name
    Mr Clark
    Quote Originally Posted by Paul S. View Post
    Mate, my eldest granddaughter's husband was an engineering officer in HMAS CANBERRA. He told me that the flight deck isn't strong enough for the weight (and landing force) anything but helicopters. That means that helicopter gunships with their limited linger, range and capability would the only close air support an opposed landing could expect if the ship was operating independently and beyond the range of land based RAAF close air support.
    Paul, if that's right, then that is outrageous and and a scandalous waste of Australianicon taxpayers money.

    Canberra and her sister have been built with ski jumps (not bolted to the flight deck, but part of the intrinsic design) to enable them to operate F35B's, the jump serves no other purpose.

    Should Australia procure a number of B models, then Canberra and her sister would be very useful and capable light multi roll aircraft carriers.

    As Ron quite rightly says, Australia is an Island nation.

    Like the UKicon its entirety dependent on its main line of supply, ie the sea.

    After a very long wait, the UK has finally woken up to the need to operate Aircraft Carriers again and is in the process of commissioning two 70,000 ton vessels.

    The UK has decimated its conventional defences to fight the War on terror, a grave mistake and one that will one day bite us on the arse.



    If I was a US taxpayer, I would be very unhappy at having to guarantee and fund Defence for the entire Western world!
    Last edited by mrclark303; 01-13-2018 at 06:29 AM.

  2. The Following 2 Members Say Thank You to mrclark303 For This Useful Post:


  3. # ADS
    Friends and Sponsors
    Join Date
    October 2006
    Location
    Milsurps.Com
    Posts
    All Threads
     

  4. #12
    Really Senior Member Sunray's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2009
    Last On
    03-14-2020 @ 02:19 PM
    Location
    London, Ontario
    Posts
    983
    Local Date
    05-27-2020
    Local Time
    09:41 AM
    "...our new subs are being built off shore..." Better than buying old Brit Upholder class subs in 1998 that were way past being serviceable. Our lot bought several that tried to sink after catching fire, on the trip across the North Atlantic. So don't buy used kit from the RN.
    "...we have aircraft that can use one..." CF's F-18's are carrier rated. As are the drivers. And we have no big boat to put 'em on.
    Spelling and Grammar count!

  5. The Following 2 Members Say Thank You to Sunray For This Useful Post:


  6. Avoid Ads - Become a Contributing Member - Click HERE
  7. #13
    Senior Member old tanker's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2017
    Last On
    Today @ 01:33 AM
    Location
    Fort Knox, KY
    Age
    70
    Posts
    186
    Local Date
    05-27-2020
    Local Time
    09:41 AM
    Real Name
    Emil
    Sad to say, but for most soldiers, in most Armies, I believe Kipling got it right.


  8. The Following 3 Members Say Thank You to old tanker For This Useful Post:


  9. #14
    Contributing Member CINDERS's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2009
    Last On
    Today @ 07:31 AM
    Location
    Southern Corner Western Australia
    Posts
    6,125
    Local Date
    05-27-2020
    Local Time
    09:41 PM
    Real Name
    CINDERS
    Thanks O/T pretty well spot on was the pic of the chaps with the No 4 with the spike attached moving forward I must confess have not seen to many shots of that type plenty with the '07 but not the spike.

  10. #15
    Really Senior Member Paul S.'s Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2009
    Last On
    04-08-2020 @ 06:58 PM
    Location
    Back and forth between Sydney and Southern California
    Posts
    1,594
    Local Date
    05-27-2020
    Local Time
    08:41 AM
    Quote Originally Posted by mrclark303 View Post
    Paul, if that's right, then that is outrageous and and a scandalous waste of Australianicon taxpayers money.

    Canberra and her sister have been built with ski jumps (not bolted to the flight deck, but part of the intrinsic design) to enable them to operate F35B's, the jump serves no other purpose.

    Should Australia procure a number of B models, then Canberra and her sister would be very useful and capable light multi roll aircraft carriers.

    As Ron quite rightly says, Australia is an Island nation.

    Like the UKicon its entirety dependent on its main line of supply, ie the sea.

    After a very long wait, the UK has finally woken up to the need to operate Aircraft Carriers again and is in the process of commissioning two 70,000 ton vessels.

    The UK has decimated its conventional defences to fight the War on terror, a grave mistake and one that will one day bite us on the arse.

    If I was a US taxpayer, I would be very unhappy at having to guarantee and fund Defence for the entire Western world!

    I fully agree on all points.

    Re: CANBERRA and the F35s - I sent my grandson in law video of the F35 carrier tests when he was first posted aboard CANBERRA knowing that her flight deck had a 'jump jet ramp'. The ship was still going through her post commissioning work-ups and certifications at the time. That was when he told me she wasn't fixed wing (F35, etc.) capable because the deck wasn't strong enough. My immediate thought was, 'Well that's f*cking great isn't it?' Yeah, it's great having a ship that can deliver and amphibious force, but it's a lot better if the ship can defend and support the ashore force. Basically, it rules out anything operating independently of land based or carrier borne aircraft if the operating against a significant opposing force.

    But then, I'm not the bloke at the top of the pile in the ACT who makes the decisions and signs the cheques.

    Mind you, CANBERRA performed sterling duty when she went up to Fiji after the cyclone went through.
    Last edited by Paul S.; 01-13-2018 at 10:00 PM.

  11. Thank You to Paul S. For This Useful Post:


  12. #16
    Really Senior Member Merle's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2007
    Last On
    Yesterday @ 10:50 PM
    Location
    Mercer County, PA, USA
    Age
    72
    Posts
    309
    Local Date
    05-27-2020
    Local Time
    09:41 AM
    Quote Originally Posted by Sunray View Post
    "...our new subs are being built off shore..." Better than buying old Brit Upholder class subs in 1998 that were way past being serviceable. Our lot bought several that tried to sink after catching fire, on the trip across the North Atlantic. So don't buy used kit from the RN.
    "...we have aircraft that can use one..." CF's F-18's are carrier rated. As are the drivers. And we have no big boat to put 'em on.
    perhaps the Collins class subs have something to do with that decision?

  13. #17
    Really Senior Member GeeRam's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2017
    Last On
    Yesterday @ 10:40 AM
    Location
    Berkshire, UK
    Posts
    347
    Local Date
    05-27-2020
    Local Time
    02:41 PM
    Quote Originally Posted by Gil Boyd View Post
    Clearly thoughts from people who have no idea of the specific roles each unit plays:

    Reports Of Plans To Merge Paras And Marines
    Words fail me............

    The brainless morons that dreamed up this idea need to be taken aside and given a

  14. Thank You to GeeRam For This Useful Post:


  15. #18
    Contributing Member CINDERS's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2009
    Last On
    Today @ 07:31 AM
    Location
    Southern Corner Western Australia
    Posts
    6,125
    Local Date
    05-27-2020
    Local Time
    09:41 PM
    Real Name
    CINDERS
    I will agree Merle the "Colins" had their issues but most of which was sorted I think they ended up buying the fire control system from the USAicon Navy, foggy memory that there was an issue with noise from the prop shafts cannot remember but there was a noise issue.
    In the end they ended up a pretty quiet fish which if you can believe what was said about them gave the USN's hunter killer submarines curry apparently in wargames, once a friend I knew was out a fair way fishing when one of these things surfaced fired up the diesels to get under way he thought it was on fire the amount of black smoke that issued from it bit like the Canberra Bombers with their starter cartridges.....

    Here's another told to me that when the US carrier is out with its fleet there is more to it under water a story I got from a friend who was at Gage roads W.A's Naval base that when the fleet was in Freo the sub/s attached to them surfaced at night with just the sail visible.
    Whether true or not does not worry me as it makes tactical sense to have one or two attached as the best way to kill a sub is with another one.
    Last edited by CINDERS; 02-05-2018 at 08:41 PM.

  16. Thank You to CINDERS For This Useful Post:


+ Reply to Thread
Page 2 of 2 FirstFirst 1 2

Similar Threads

  1. Royal Australian Regiment M60
    By Sarge1998 in forum Other LMG/HMG and SMG Forum
    Replies: 35
    Last Post: 03-12-2017, 10:45 PM
  2. Royal Navy Use of No4 Rifles
    By Flying10uk in forum The Lee Enfield Knowledge Library Collectors Forum
    Replies: 10
    Last Post: 05-09-2016, 01:10 PM
  3. Royal Marines Behind the Lines (BBC Documentary)
    By DanL96a1 in forum The Screening Room
    Replies: 0
    Last Post: 02-09-2016, 09:10 AM
  4. Broomhandle marked 'Royal'
    By Robert303 in forum Other Military Service Pistols and Revolvers
    Replies: 1
    Last Post: 08-19-2013, 04:07 PM
  5. The Royal Marines special returns ! (CGN Private Ad)
    By Badger in forum Appraisals, Fakery, Dispute Resolution & Mediation Forum
    Replies: 2
    Last Post: 05-20-2008, 05:09 PM

Tags for this Thread

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts