+ Reply to Thread
Page 1 of 3 1 2 3 LastLast
Results 1 to 10 of 29

Thread: Savage T sniper question

Click here to increase the font size Click here to reduce the font size
  1. #1
    Member Cheesy411's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2016
    Last On
    07-10-2020 @ 02:42 PM
    Location
    Nevada USA
    Posts
    10
    Local Date
    09-19-2020
    Local Time
    01:18 AM

    Savage T sniper question

    Hello,



    I am new to post but have been a lurker for a long time, I currently own one T less savage and a nice BSA both are correct. I recently bid and won an auction on a very earl OC serial range Savage, but it has some “potential flags” about it. For starters the rear sight was swapped for a national match Parker Hale (nice addition) and this could have been done by a shooter was enthusiastic about increasing accuracy.

    The second give away is the king screw swivel missing, I know these weren’t always issued but at times of overhaul they were out fitted. Third, the buttstock isn’t a savage butlooks to be a different wood from the rest. Serial range is an early 1943, I have a three day inspection window and it will arrive tomorrow. I’m going to post the link to the gunbroker auction (ended) to see if I can get any thoughts before it arrives. I do own the armourers perspective and has come in handy, but with this rifle I need a little more help. I should also mention it has the “TR” on the socket but no “T” on the receiver wall, and at one point was issued a scope or it seems it was.

    https://www.gunbroker.com/item/821686445
    Information
    Warning: This is a relatively older thread
    This discussion is older than 360 days. Some information contained in it may no longer be current.

  2. # ADS
    Friends and Sponsors
    Join Date
    October 2006
    Location
    Milsurps.Com
    Posts
    All Threads
     

  3. #2
    Advisory Panel Lee Enfield's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2006
    Last On
    Yesterday @ 10:50 PM
    Location
    out there
    Posts
    1,521
    Local Date
    09-19-2020
    Local Time
    12:18 AM
    looks like a good deal. forget the swivel as a "potential flag" - it's a replaceable part.

    I'd be more interested in whether it retains it's original barrel (probably originally 6 groove).

    remove the butt stock and see if it has a serial number under the socket shelf - it's possible that it was replaced at conversion...or FTR..or..again it's a replaceable part.
    BSN from the Republic of Alberta

    http://www.cartridgecollectors.org/

  4. Avoid Ads - Become a Contributing Member - Click HERE
  5. #3
    Contributing Member smle addict's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2011
    Last On
    Today @ 01:19 AM
    Location
    CA, USA
    Posts
    312
    Local Date
    09-18-2020
    Local Time
    11:18 PM
    I'll go out on a limb and say you did alright. I have two 1943 BSA T's that look like yours; black paint (suncorite), differing wood. I have owned three Savages like the one pictured over the years. The first one I had was near perfect. It was stocked in walnut, had a few small dings, all parts savage, S51 on stock. I had another that was still all original, cheekpiece removed, and heavily used; probably during service India. Sold those two when I divorced. Neither had the sling swivel in front of magazine.

    The one I currently own is a Mk I*, no scope number, no T, (but marked TR), and is wearing a replacement forearm. It was originally a cut down sporter. Its a nice shooter now. This rifle also has evidence of bubba's ham-fists trying to removed the scope pad screws. Mine are all boogered-up like yours.

    If you decide to keep (which I would) I have a spare T backsight with ground off battle-peep. It's SM41 marked. If interested, maybe we can work a deal, as I a need PH sight (like yours) for one of my .22's.

    Either way, I think it's an honest, well-traveled rifle that has picked up a few non-S pieces here and there throughout its life. I'd keep it.

    Best of luck

    edit- I do remember both of my previous rifles had 5-goove barrels, dated 1945. My current one also has a 5 groove '45.

  6. #4
    Member Cheesy411's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2016
    Last On
    07-10-2020 @ 02:42 PM
    Location
    Nevada USA
    Posts
    10
    Local Date
    09-19-2020
    Local Time
    01:18 AM
    Thread Starter
    Quote Originally Posted by smle addict View Post
    I'll go out on a limb and say you did alright. I have two 1943 BSA T's that look like yours; black paint (suncorite), differing wood. I have owned three Savages like the one pictured over the years. The first one I had was near perfect. It was stocked in walnut, had a few small dings, all parts savage, S51 on stock. I had another that was still all original, cheekpiece removed, and heavily used; probably during service India. Sold those two when I divorced. Neither had the sling swivel in front of magazine.

    The one I currently own is a Mk I*, no scope number, no T, (but marked TR), and is wearing a replacement forearm. It was originally a cut down sporter. Its a nice shooter now. This rifle also has evidence of bubba's ham-fists trying to removed the scope pad screws. Mine are all boogered-up like yours.

    If you decide to keep (which I would) I have a spare T backsight with ground off battle-peep. It's SM41 marked. If interested, maybe we can work a deal, as I a need PH sight (like yours) for one of my .22's.

    Either way, I think it's an honest, well-traveled rifle that has picked up a few non-S pieces here and there throughout its life. I'd keep it.

    Best of luck

    edit- I do remember both of my previous rifles had 5-goove barrels, dated 1945. My current one also has a 5 groove '45.
    I would be interested in a deal on the sights, I have never seen a Parker Hale sight like this. This is my 2nd savage as well, my first is a mark I* T-less that has a two groove barrel. Very picky on ammo, I used wolf once and it would key hole like no other. My M47c on the other hand, I would take into battle no questions. Very reliable accurate weapon, just feels right behind the sights on that one.

  7. #5
    Advisory Panel Brian Dick's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2008
    Last On
    09-14-2020 @ 04:19 PM
    Location
    Edgefield, SC USA
    Posts
    3,721
    Local Date
    09-19-2020
    Local Time
    02:18 AM
    I've had several legit Savage No.4Mk.1* T rifles but have never seen one dated 1943. I've seen Savage Mk.1 rifles dated 1941 and still have 0C160 here in my collection. It was also never completed with a scope. All of the Mk.1* Savages I've had were dated 1942. Many Savage rifles failed the stocking up at H&H and that's why you find them with Britishicon walnut forends. They will often have five groove British barrels installed too.

    ---------- Post added at 08:17 PM ---------- Previous post was at 08:13 PM ----------

    I think you're mistaking stained birch for walnut smle addict. I've had hundreds of Savage No.4 service rifles and have yet to see a Savage marked walnut forend, handguard or butt. I could be wrong but I don't think they exist. Was your wood replaced with British walnut?

  8. #6
    Member Cheesy411's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2016
    Last On
    07-10-2020 @ 02:42 PM
    Location
    Nevada USA
    Posts
    10
    Local Date
    09-19-2020
    Local Time
    01:18 AM
    Thread Starter
    Quote Originally Posted by Brian Dickicon View Post
    I've had several legit Savage No.4Mk.1* T rifles but have never seen one dated 1943. I've seen Savage Mk.1 rifles dated 1941 and still have 0C160 here in my collection. It was also never completed with a scope. All of the Mk.1* Savages I've had were dated 1942. Many Savage rifles failed the stocking up at H&H and that's why you find them with Britishicon walnut forends. They will often have five groove British barrels installed too.

    ---------- Post added at 08:17 PM ---------- Previous post was at 08:13 PM ----------

    I think you're mistaking stained birch for walnut smle addict. I've had hundreds of Savage No.4 service rifles and have yet to see a Savage marked walnut forend, handguard or butt. I could be wrong but I don't think they exist. Was your wood replaced with British walnut?
    I was incorrect in saying mine were a 1943, they both are 1942 to include the one in the link.

  9. #7
    Contributing Member smle addict's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2011
    Last On
    Today @ 01:19 AM
    Location
    CA, USA
    Posts
    312
    Local Date
    09-18-2020
    Local Time
    11:18 PM
    Brian:

    You are correct sir, and as sharp as ever. The early (1942) one I had was indeed replaced with Britishicon walnut, I assume when the barrel was swapped out to a five-groove. After all the years, I forgot the fine details. I do remember I paid $350 for it. This was the same time unwrapped No 4's were selling for $179, and SKS' were $59. $350 seemed like a lot back then. If I had only kept it...

    The beat-up one was birch, as is my current savage. Albeit, its an un-numbered Savage replacement.

    Cheesy411: when you get the rifle and if you decide to keep it, PM me, re: sight swap.

  10. Thank You to smle addict For This Useful Post:


  11. #8
    Member Cheesy411's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2016
    Last On
    07-10-2020 @ 02:42 PM
    Location
    Nevada USA
    Posts
    10
    Local Date
    09-19-2020
    Local Time
    01:18 AM
    Thread Starter
    Quote Originally Posted by smle addict View Post
    Brian:

    You are correct sir, and as sharp as ever. The early (1942) one I had was indeed replaced with Britishicon walnut, I assume when the barrel was swapped out to a five-groove. After all the years, I forgot the fine details. I do remember I paid $350 for it. This was the same time unwrapped No 4's were selling for $179, and SKS' were $59. $350 seemed like a lot back then. If I had only kept it...

    The beat-up one was birch, as is my current savage. Albeit, its an un-numbered Savage replacement.

    Cheesy411: when you get the rifle and if you decide to keep it, PM me, re: sight swap.
    If all checks out and it is the real deal I plan on keeping it, I was trying to save some money but I’m sucker for anything commonwealth let alone no4 snipers. I listed a few things to make my purchase lol.

  12. #9
    Contributing Member smle addict's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2011
    Last On
    Today @ 01:19 AM
    Location
    CA, USA
    Posts
    312
    Local Date
    09-18-2020
    Local Time
    11:18 PM
    here a thread link to the Savage I put back to shooting condition:

    https://www.milsurps.com/showthread.php?t=55161

  13. #10
    Really Senior Member Frederick303's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2008
    Last On
    07-28-2020 @ 09:41 PM
    Location
    Pipersville PA US
    Posts
    739
    Local Date
    09-19-2020
    Local Time
    02:18 AM
    How does any Savage T have the TR marking on it, if that was a selection marking applied ad BSA and Maltby?

  14. Thank You to Frederick303 For This Useful Post:


+ Reply to Thread
Page 1 of 3 1 2 3 LastLast

Similar Threads

  1. Savage Sniper
    By giove in forum The Lee Enfield Knowledge Library Collectors Forum
    Replies: 32
    Last Post: 07-15-2019, 03:25 PM
  2. Savage sniper
    By Craig Eberhardt in forum The Lee Enfield Knowledge Library Collectors Forum
    Replies: 8
    Last Post: 05-23-2015, 07:32 PM
  3. savage sniper for bbid
    By stardog123 in forum Commercial Auction and Sale "Gossip"
    Replies: 1
    Last Post: 01-23-2015, 11:30 PM
  4. Enfield No4 Mk 1* Savage sniper
    By 6pack in forum The Lee Enfield Knowledge Library Collectors Forum
    Replies: 39
    Last Post: 12-15-2014, 04:33 PM
  5. Do I have a Savage sniper?
    By Mudhut in forum The Lee Enfield Knowledge Library Collectors Forum
    Replies: 79
    Last Post: 07-08-2011, 08:44 AM

Tags for this Thread

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts