1. It appears that you are you're enjoying our Military Surplus Collectors Forums, but haven't created an account yet. As an unregistered guest, your are unable to post and are limited to the amount of viewing time you will receive, so why not take a minute to Register for your own free account now? As a member you get free access to our forums and knowledge libraries, plus the ability to post your own messages and communicate directly with other members. So, if you'd like to join our community, please CLICK HERE to Register !

    Already a member? Login at the top right corner of this page to stop seeing this message.

+ Reply to Thread
Results 1 to 10 of 13
Click here to increase the font size Click here to reduce the font size

Hybrid View

  1. #1
    Deceased August 31st, 2020 englishman_ca's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2006
    Last On
    08-15-2020 @ 07:19 AM
    Location
    Ontario
    Posts
    378
    Local Date
    05-18-2024
    Local Time
    10:22 AM
    The bad news is that the 'Mk.III receiver' has totally bogus markings. All of those markings are faked.
    It is a Khyber special sold as a souvenir to some GI Joe. The thing is actually a Mk.IV.

    Good news is that it is probably a genuine Britishicon made unit that has been remarked for sale in the Casbah. It might even be in working condition.
    Information
    Warning: This is a relatively older thread
    This discussion is older than 360 days. Some information contained in it may no longer be current.

  2. #2
    vykkagur
    Guest vykkagur's Avatar
    Quote Originally Posted by englishman_ca View Post
    The bad news is that the 'Mk.III receiver' has totally bogus markings. All of those markings are faked.
    It is a Khyber special sold as a souvenir to some GI Joe. The thing is actually a Mk.IV.

    Good news is that it is probably a genuine Britishicon made unit that has been remarked for sale in the Casbah. It might even be in working condition.
    At least they spelled "Enfield" right....

    So, as long as he wasn't looking for an authentic collector's item to build a period-correct rifle, it looks like he's landed on his feet then? Shame he couldn't lose the misleading markings, but that might do too much damage by thinning the receiver sides too much. They already ground it down removing the original stamps. Still. it could make a very nice shooter, if it all checks out safe.

  3. Avoid Ads - Become a Contributing Member - Click HERE
+ Reply to Thread

Similar Threads

  1. No1 MkIII question
    By LongRifle75 in forum The Lee Enfield Knowledge Library Collectors Forum
    Replies: 7
    Last Post: 11-20-2014, 04:56 AM
  2. No. 4 Receiver Question
    By Salt Flat in forum Gunsmithing for Old Milsurps
    Replies: 3
    Last Post: 07-18-2013, 01:53 PM
  3. No1 MKIII stock question
    By LongRifle75 in forum The Lee Enfield Knowledge Library Collectors Forum
    Replies: 1
    Last Post: 05-13-2013, 09:36 PM
  4. Question on desporterizing a No.1 MkIII
    By Rumpelhardt in forum The Restorer's Corner
    Replies: 17
    Last Post: 03-28-2011, 02:56 AM
  5. telescope tel sig mkIII question
    By hopmanhenk in forum The Lee Enfield Knowledge Library Collectors Forum
    Replies: 8
    Last Post: 09-01-2009, 05:07 PM

Tags for this Thread

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts