Hmm...well now I’m back to thinking it might actually be military.
That era matches the workmanship better. Nothing wrong with the era...I just wouldn’t expect the beautiful cast aluminum cutaways you see from around WW2.
Thanks, guys!
---------- Post added at 07:43 PM ---------- Previous post was at 07:42 PM ----------
I meant to say now I think the *model* is of original military manufacture/use.
If this model ended up being a representation of a sight from the ‘30s or ‘40s, I would not feel it was a genuine military use article. The construction and quality just wouldn’t match up with the era.
Thanks to you and RCS pointing out it’s meant to be an M60 rear sight, now I’m back to thinking the model may indeed be military. The late ‘60s or early ‘70s match up better with what I’m seeing in terms of build technique/quality.
Long winded way of saying, “thanks for the good news!”
Yes, this is an example of what would be at the front of the class to teach sight manipulation to a very large room full of gunners. Hard to imagine how many in the room unless you see it, thus the over large models.
For every military oversize model that was used as a training aid there is a manual to go with it.
I have a manual for the oversized M1 Rifle printed in 1951 by the US Navy for the Army National Guard. These are difficult to locate as years ago there was not much interest in these manuals