+ Reply to Thread
Results 1 to 6 of 6

Thread: New Hatcher hole in 1903

Click here to increase the font size Click here to reduce the font size
  1. #1
    Contributing Member RDG's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2022
    Last On
    10-19-2024 @ 07:38 PM
    Location
    Bay county FL
    Posts
    22
    Local Date
    11-10-2024
    Local Time
    04:09 PM

    New Hatcher hole in 1903

    My RIA 1903 s/n 151357 built in 1908, I think, came to me in a trade back in 1982 and sat on the shelf until recently when I obtained a go/no-go gauge set and found insufficient head space. The rifle has a scant stock and a SA-42 barrel, ladder sight, and came with no Hatcher hole. From what I have learned here and other places, I would think if the rifle had been pulled back in and overhauled for WWII that they might have drilled a Hatcher hole in it - not sure about the sight. Is that a reasonable assumption? Anyway, I am assuming this to be a "parts gun" meaning the barrel could have been put on there any time between 1942 and 1982 when I got it.

    I contacted a highly recommended gunsmith who works as a gunsmith for a three-initial federal agency in DC for help, and he has reamed the bore to proper proportions and cut a Harcher hole in the weapon and test fired it. His comment was that the receiver was VERY hard requiring tooling harder than he normally needs to conduct the work he performed.

    While it is not planned to make this a "daily driver," this receiver appears to be quite usable.

  2. # ADS
    Friends and Sponsors
    Join Date
    October 2006
    Location
    Milsurps.Com
    Posts
    All Threads
    A Collector's View - The SMLE Short Magazine Lee Enfield 1903-1989. It is 300 8.5x11 inch pages with 1,000+ photo’s, most in color, and each book is serial-numbered.  Covering the SMLE from 1903 to the end of production in India in 1989 it looks at how each model differs and manufacturer differences from a collecting point of view along with the major accessories that could be attached to the rifle. For the record this is not a moneymaker, I hope just to break even, eventually, at $80/book plus shipping.  In the USA shipping is $5.00 for media mail.  I will accept PayPal, Zelle, MO and good old checks (and cash if you want to stop by for a tour!).  CLICK BANNER to send me a PM for International pricing and shipping. Manufacturer of various vintage rifle scopes for the 1903 such as our M73G4 (reproduction of the Weaver 330C) and Malcolm 8X Gen II (Unertl reproduction). Several of our scopes are used in the CMP Vintage Sniper competition on top of 1903 rifles. Brian Dick ... BDL Ltd. - Specializing in British and Commonwealth weapons Specializing in premium ammunition and reloading components. Your source for the finest in High Power Competition Gear. Here at T-bones Shipwrighting we specialise in vintage service rifle: re-barrelling, bedding, repairs, modifications and accurizing. We also provide importation services for firearms, parts and weapons, for both private or commercial businesses.
     

  3. #2
    Contributing Member ssgross's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2020
    Last On
    Today @ 01:38 PM
    Location
    Virginia
    Posts
    1,624
    Local Date
    11-10-2024
    Local Time
    04:09 PM
    Scant stocks were often used as replacements. At one point I saw a document, likely on this forum, listing scants as "field replacement" stocks.
    I wouldn't be surprised if a 1903 re-barreled during WWII closed on 2020's commercial no-go gauge. Let me explain.
    Commercial 30-06 gauges are known to be slightly undersize from the WW2 vintage USGI gauges. The reason was to allow the semi-auto garand to continue functioning with some acceptable quantity of mud, dirt, or other fouling during combat conditions. I have also checked many an expert grade garand from CMPicon, and they either barely close or fall barely a hair's width short from closing all the way on a forster no-go. I have been told the clymer gauges are somewhere between the Forster and original USGI. I don't have the clymer gauges nor a USGI set, so I suppose I could still just be blowing smoke. Someone else can chime in and confirm. In any case, if you close on a commercial no-go it is always best to check with the field gauge. Those brand new expert grades I mentioned come no where close to even starting to close on a Forster field gauge.

    EDIT: Just to add confirmation, CMP Armorer John McClean explains more or less what I tried to say above in the gauges section of this article http://www.odcmp.org/0309/default.asp?page=M1HEADSPACE
    Last edited by ssgross; 10-10-2024 at 12:11 AM.

  4. Thank You to ssgross For This Useful Post:


  5. Avoid Ads - Become a Contributing Member - Click HERE
  6. #3
    Contributing Member RDG's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2022
    Last On
    10-19-2024 @ 07:38 PM
    Location
    Bay county FL
    Posts
    22
    Local Date
    11-10-2024
    Local Time
    04:09 PM
    Thread Starter
    Thank you for the response and the info on gauges. I failed to mention that I had also checked the head space with new commercial ammo and the bolt from another 1903 I own. Bolts failed to close at the same spot.

  7. #4
    Contributing Member ssgross's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2020
    Last On
    Today @ 01:38 PM
    Location
    Virginia
    Posts
    1,624
    Local Date
    11-10-2024
    Local Time
    04:09 PM
    Quote Originally Posted by RDG View Post
    and found insufficient head space
    I need go stop posting late at night. I read the opposite of what you wrote! I've seen "short" 1903 chambers too. Sometimes there is some scale buildup or surface rust in the chamber, sometimes a burr. Sometimes it's the ammo, sometimes the chamber really is just a tad short. A light polishing of the chamber fixes the former, lightly chasing with a reamer fixes all the other. To polish a chamber, cut slot in the end of a 1/4" dowel. Fold over a small piece of 800 grit wet/dry and insert in the slot to make a flapper and spin it in the chamber. It's a good idea to mark the dowel so you don't polish beyond the shoulder.

  8. #5
    Contributing Member RDG's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2022
    Last On
    10-19-2024 @ 07:38 PM
    Location
    Bay county FL
    Posts
    22
    Local Date
    11-10-2024
    Local Time
    04:09 PM
    Thread Starter
    Thanks again for your thoughts. Personally, I would have been uncomfortable going DIY one this one fearing I might ruin a valuable item. In fact, I am prone to leave any gunsmithing beyond minor cosmetics to a professional. In this case, I was pleased to have this experienced pro's thoughts on what heconsidered the exceptional hardness of the reciever after he used a new .30-06 reamer to correct the headspace and carbide tooling to do the gas relief. It was not cheap, but then the rifle came to me free with the trade of another weapon I picked up off the deck of USS Denver in the evacuation of Saigon.

  9. #6
    Legacy Member togor's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2009
    Last On
    11-07-2024 @ 11:15 AM
    Posts
    90
    Local Date
    11-10-2024
    Local Time
    04:09 PM
    Hardness in a receiver or bolt are great, until they aren't. Maybe not best receiver on which to have a case head let go. You are wise to be fastidious about head space on this one.

+ Reply to Thread

Similar Threads

  1. Hatcher Hole?
    By John Beard in forum M1903/1903A3/A4 Springfield Rifle
    Replies: 10
    Last Post: 10-31-2009, 01:16 PM
  2. Hatcher Hole..again
    By Doug Douglass in forum M1903/1903A3/A4 Springfield Rifle
    Replies: 3
    Last Post: 09-02-2009, 01:39 AM
  3. USMC 1903's "Hatcher Hole"
    By SUB VET II in forum M1903/1903A3/A4 Springfield Rifle
    Replies: 4
    Last Post: 08-30-2009, 10:57 PM
  4. 1903A1 NM Hatcher Hole, bolt hole question......
    By 218bee in forum M1903/1903A3/A4 Springfield Rifle
    Replies: 4
    Last Post: 03-19-2009, 08:24 PM
  5. 03MK1 and a Hatcher hole
    By snell in forum M1903/1903A3/A4 Springfield Rifle
    Replies: 11
    Last Post: 03-05-2009, 10:58 PM

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts