-
Originally Posted by
Promo
Thanks Georg and to other members, this was the one in post No5, shame pics have gone but not to worry, I've a lot of bits collected over the years to build up a .22 or something different, the problem I've found is the woodwork for the P14/P17 is like hens teeth (when I've been looking) but I won a lovely set from an auction last year for a P14 , so gathering up a few ideas.
I've Probably been watching too much Dads Army over the last few months thats prompting me........ on the subject of Dad Army, I was watching last year There were a few scripts that had the sound recordings but not the film or the film was lost, they improvised by using drawn sketches etc, it was excellent.
-
-
01-08-2025 10:06 PM
# ADS
Friends and Sponsors
-
Legacy Member
The trouble with converting any front-locking action to .22 was, and is, feeding the tiny cartridge across the 'dead space' where the lugs lock up. Rear-locking actions like the Lee-Enfield present less problems.
-
-
-
Contributing Member
Originally Posted by
Mk VII
The trouble with converting any front-locking action to .22 was, and is, feeding the tiny cartridge across the 'dead space' where the lugs lock up. Rear-locking actions like the Lee-Enfield present less problems.
Well, the .22 does not need large locking lugs. The Parker-Hale .22 conversions of the P.14 only lock with the bolt handle at the rear. There are no locking lugs at the front.
-