Just to clarify... all kudos to Collectors Firearms for hosting the Arms Heritage material. That is a great gift to the firearms community.

The problem is there were some bad results of whatever process they used to convert and host the material: some parts of the text were mangled (e.g., "BSA&M" was replaced by "B&M" throughout--an important distinction---and many of the footnotes were truncated or lost).

Therefore, the PDF version attached at the top of this thread should be considered the correct version.

FYI, the original version published in Arms Heritage magazine was correct, and the hard copies offered by Cornell Pubs are correct.