+ Reply to Thread
Page 1 of 3 1 2 3 LastLast
Results 1 to 10 of 28

Thread: Accuracy Specification for the Lee Enfield

Click here to increase the font size Click here to reduce the font size
  1. #1
    FREE MEMBER
    NO Posting or PM's Allowed
    303Guy's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2013
    Last On
    05-07-2015 @ 03:49 AM
    Location
    New Zealand
    Posts
    97
    Real Name
    Peter Otte
    Local Date
    11-01-2024
    Local Time
    11:02 AM

    Accuracy Specification for the Lee Enfield

    I read about the poor performance of the MLE's against the Boers with their 7x57 Mausers and that the accuracy specification for the MLE was rather loose.

    What is the truth?

    I know the Boers were in their element and that their environment developed their eyesight and their shooting skills, not to mention their guerilla warfare skills and tactics.
    Information
    Warning: This is a relatively older thread
    This discussion is older than 360 days. Some information contained in it may no longer be current.

  2. # ADS
    Friends and Sponsors
    Join Date
    October 2006
    Location
    Milsurps.Com
    Posts
    All Threads
    A Collector's View - The SMLE Short Magazine Lee Enfield 1903-1989. It is 300 8.5x11 inch pages with 1,000+ photo’s, most in color, and each book is serial-numbered.  Covering the SMLE from 1903 to the end of production in India in 1989 it looks at how each model differs and manufacturer differences from a collecting point of view along with the major accessories that could be attached to the rifle. For the record this is not a moneymaker, I hope just to break even, eventually, at $80/book plus shipping.  In the USA shipping is $5.00 for media mail.  I will accept PayPal, Zelle, MO and good old checks (and cash if you want to stop by for a tour!).  CLICK BANNER to send me a PM for International pricing and shipping. Manufacturer of various vintage rifle scopes for the 1903 such as our M73G4 (reproduction of the Weaver 330C) and Malcolm 8X Gen II (Unertl reproduction). Several of our scopes are used in the CMP Vintage Sniper competition on top of 1903 rifles. Brian Dick ... BDL Ltd. - Specializing in British and Commonwealth weapons Specializing in premium ammunition and reloading components. Your source for the finest in High Power Competition Gear. Here at T-bones Shipwrighting we specialise in vintage service rifle: re-barrelling, bedding, repairs, modifications and accurizing. We also provide importation services for firearms, parts and weapons, for both private or commercial businesses.
     

  3. #2
    Legacy Member 5thBatt's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2007
    Last On
    10-20-2024 @ 08:49 PM
    Location
    Zombie Town, now with a H
    Posts
    776
    Local Date
    11-01-2024
    Local Time
    12:02 PM
    Only a small percentage of new production arms were tested for accuracy in those days plus the introduction of Enfield rifling left troops with rifles that were woefully inaccurate due to the lack of sighting-in.

  4. Avoid Ads - Become a Contributing Member - Click HERE
  5. #3
    Legacy Member Maxwell Smart's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2008
    Last On
    07-28-2024 @ 08:01 AM
    Location
    Queensland, Australia
    Posts
    411
    Local Date
    10-31-2024
    Local Time
    06:02 PM
    And also were not the MLM's and MLE's basically regarded as single loaders in the doctrine of the time, with the magazine kept in reserve?

    A rifle might not need to be a tack-driver if its method of employment is by firing of controlled volleys against a massed target of standing, charging attackers. Different story when your enemy sensibly takes cover behind trees and rocks to shoot back at you with his own (charger-loading) rifle.

  6. #4
    Legacy Member Bruce_in_Oz's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2008
    Last On
    10-27-2024 @ 12:07 AM
    Location
    Brisbane
    Posts
    2,258
    Local Date
    11-01-2024
    Local Time
    09:02 AM
    Don't have the specs on the early L-E rifles to hand, but I do have the SMLE stuff.

    In the 1938 Acceptance Specs, para 42 says:

    ....Every rifle will be fired at a paper target.......at a range of 100 FEET, (not yards), from a mechanical rest.


    Blah, blah, adjustment, blah etc.

    Then five rounds will be fired from the magazine; if the rifle fails to put four shots out of the five into a rectangle 1 inch broad and 1 1/2 inch high, or if the blade, foresight requires to be set more than .03 inch to one side of its normal position, the rifle will be returned to the manufacturer.

    (Mk Vll ball is the standard in 1938).

    Back in July 1903, with Mk6 ammo, the spec reads:

    Every rifle will be fired ......at a range of 100 feet, from a mechanical rest. on the paper target will be a rectangle 1 1/2 inches broad and 2 inches high, bottom of rectangle to be 1 inch immediately above the point aimed at.

    Some adjustments later..................

    .......................If the rifle fails to put four shots out of the five into the rectangle, or if the foresight requires to be set more than .03 inch to one side of its normal position, the rifle will be returned to the manufacturer.

    Basically we are looking at group requirement of 3MOA wide and 4.5MOA high.

    Good enough for government work.

    Interestingly, both specs call for the ammo used in testing to be itself specially selected for a good "figure of merit" (small groups, no fliers).

    A marginal rifle with sub-standard (or NON-standard) ammo is likely to be a real dog.

  7. Thank You to Bruce_in_Oz For This Useful Post:


  8. #5
    Legacy Member Bindi2's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2008
    Last On
    Yesterday @ 06:18 AM
    Location
    Western Australia
    Posts
    1,463
    Local Date
    11-01-2024
    Local Time
    07:02 AM
    The experience with the Boers and 7mm brought on the P13 in .276. The 7mm is still kicking *ss and i love my 303s and 308s. Might have to put a 7mm together for the range only when i get tired of getting my *ss kicked by a certain shooter wont happen for awhile yet. Wish i could source .276 brass. I have a No1 Mk3 chambered for .276 dont know if it is Pederson or Enfield.
    Last edited by Bindi2; 09-06-2013 at 09:05 AM.

  9. #6
    Advisory Panel
    Peter Laidler's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2008
    Last On
    10-20-2024 @ 05:01 AM
    Location
    Abingdon, Oxfordshire. The home of MG Cars
    Posts
    16,569
    Real Name
    Peter Laidler
    Local Date
    11-01-2024
    Local Time
    12:02 AM
    I often wonder when I read all these stories about the Boers being crackshots at 5 miles etc etc. I wonder if they are the same stories that our fathers used to read about the hill tribes in Pakistan. And more recently about the shooting abilities of the Afghanistan hill tribes who could bring down a Sovieticon helicopter at 5 miles with a Lee Enfield. I don't know about them being crack shots, but their kit and shooting is so poor that they are best known as crap shots! Squirt and pray merchants.........

    As for some/most of the ammo that is siezed...........

  10. Thank You to Peter Laidler For This Useful Post:


  11. #7
    Advisory Panel Patrick Chadwick's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2008
    Last On
    06-25-2023 @ 06:36 AM
    Location
    Germany
    Posts
    5,032
    Local Date
    11-01-2024
    Local Time
    01:02 AM
    Quote Originally Posted by 303Guy View Post
    I read about the poor performance of the MLE's against the Boers with their 7x57 Mausers and that the accuracy specification for the MLE was rather loose. What is the truth?

    Bearing in mind that the "truth" in these matters is difficult to establish more than a century later, I have often read that 1) the Kragicon was(is) a beautifully smooth rifle to operate, but 2) the Krag users suffered badly at the hands of the Spanish with their 7x57 Mausers in San Juan etc, whereupon 3) the Springfield '03 appeared not long after. A matter that, BTW, involved a royalties argument with Mauser.

    Two major colonial powers both came to the conclusion that man-for-man they were being outshot by forces they had considered inferior and both, in their way, did something about it. Both were reluctant to reduce the caliber down to anything considered truly "small-bore", and both would have been better armed for accuracy a decade earlier if they had buried national pride and manufacturing interest a decade earlier and bought, for instance, Swedishicon Mausers, or at least made a licensing arrangement to keep the national factories occupied.

    ---------- Post added at 05:52 PM ---------- Previous post was at 05:47 PM ----------

    Quote Originally Posted by Bruce_in_Oz View Post
    Every rifle will be fired ......at a range of 100 feet, from a mechanical rest. on the paper target will be a rectangle 1 1/2 inches broad and 2 inches high, bottom of rectangle to be 1 inch immediately above the point aimed at. Some adjustments later.................. .......................If the rifle fails to put four shots out of the five into the rectangle, or if the foresight requires to be set more than .03 inch to one side of its normal position, the rifle will be returned to the manufacturer. Basically we are looking at group requirement of 3MOA wide and 4.5MOA high.

    I know a musket shooter who can manage that *. OK, he is/was (?check that) world champion, but as a acceptance standard for a nitro-driven cartridge rifle on a mechanical rest it's not exactly world-class, is it?


    *And kept one of his targets after a competition, to demonstrate to others what a musket can do.
    Last edited by Patrick Chadwick; 09-06-2013 at 11:57 AM.

  12. #8
    FREE MEMBER
    NO Posting or PM's Allowed
    RobD's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2010
    Last On
    10-10-2024 @ 04:38 PM
    Location
    UK / South Africa
    Posts
    942
    Local Date
    11-01-2024
    Local Time
    12:02 AM
    There are many and varied reasons why the .303 MLE was blamed for the poor performance vs. the Boers. It certainly suited the mood of the era for the press and politicians to blame the rifle. Similarly, the Zulu victory at Isandhlwana was conveniently blamed on ammo boxes...
    But I find it noteworthy that in none of the Boer accounts of the ABW which I have read (and I think I have read them all...) does the Boer writer speak disparagingly of the MLM/MLE. Indeed, Boers willingly used captured .303 rifles and ammo after the Boer cities fell (that is, for 2 yrs after June 1900).
    In addition, you may note from photos how many Boers preferred to carry carbines, which are not noted for their accuracy. Boers were also fond of using captured LECs and Martini Enfield carbines.

    What is certain is that the Boers (being used to hunting antelope) were able to judge distance well, use cover well, and above all, take snap shots on briefly-appearing or moving targets. I don't think the superior accuracy of the Mauser was considered as important at the time as it subsequently became.

    Having said all that, the Boer Mauser is a more accurate rifle in my hands; I regularly shoot 3 Boer Mausers, 2 MLEs and a ME rifle. And it's not just me - each year for the last 5 yrs our club (HBSA) has held a competition called the Siege of Ladysmith, which comprises 5 x 3 sec snaps and 1 x 20 sec exposure during which you fire 5 times.
    The target is a head-and-shoulders at 200 yds. Every year a Mauser has won.

  13. #9
    Contributing Member
    bigduke6's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2008
    Last On
    10-25-2024 @ 08:51 AM
    Location
    North West England,UK
    Posts
    3,287
    Local Date
    11-01-2024
    Local Time
    12:02 AM
    Quote Originally Posted by Bindi2 View Post
    The experience with the Boers and 7mm brought on the P13 in .276. The 7mm is still kicking *ss and i love my 303s and 308s. Might have to put a 7mm together for the range only when i get tired of getting my *ss kicked by a certain shooter wont happen for awhile yet. Wish i could source .276 brass. I have a No1 Mk3 chambered for .276 dont know if it is Pederson or Enfield.
    see link below an interesting thread regarding a P13 .276


    Building a P-13 Enfield in .276 Enfield

  14. Thank You to bigduke6 For This Useful Post:


  15. #10
    Legacy Member Ridolpho's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2012
    Last On
    09-27-2022 @ 11:12 PM
    Location
    Province of Alberta, Canada
    Age
    66
    Posts
    1,019
    Local Date
    10-31-2024
    Local Time
    05:02 PM
    From my reading it seems the problem with the MLE was zeroing not "accuracy". Rifles were sent out that would print a foot off target and no easy way to remedy- no windage adjustment on rear sight like the one added to CLLE 1* later. Also, it seems the Britishicon target fraternity were upset about the replacement of the MLE by the SMLE which suggests they found the MLE a useful target rifle? On the other hand, in the middle of the Pegler book on WW1 sniping and he makes the statement that all G98's were expected to shoot MOA and rifles that exceeded this standard!!! were selected as sniper rifles. There are some definite innacuracies regarding the firearms in this book so I don't know how accurate that MOA comment is.

    Ridolpho

  16. The Following 2 Members Say Thank You to Ridolpho For This Useful Post:


+ Reply to Thread
Page 1 of 3 1 2 3 LastLast

Similar Threads

  1. Long Lee Enfield accuracy vs the MKVII cartridge?
    By rayg in forum The Lee Enfield Knowledge Library Collectors Forum
    Replies: 26
    Last Post: 08-10-2010, 12:34 AM
  2. 1917 enfield sporter accuracy (part 3)
    By noro in forum Pattern 1913/1914 and M1917 Rifles
    Replies: 0
    Last Post: 10-25-2009, 01:15 AM
  3. 1917 enfield sporter accuracy (part 2)
    By noro in forum Pattern 1913/1914 and M1917 Rifles
    Replies: 4
    Last Post: 10-14-2009, 11:28 PM
  4. 1917 enfield sporter accuracy
    By noro in forum Pattern 1913/1914 and M1917 Rifles
    Replies: 9
    Last Post: 10-06-2009, 06:33 PM

Tags for this Thread

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts