-
FREE MEMBER
NO Posting or PM's Allowed
Information on my Lee-Enfield please
My grandmother is letting all of us grandchildren have a gun from my deceased grandfather's impressive collection. I had a great choice to choose from, there was the British
.22 trainer, the .308 Winchester that I am an excellent shot with, and of course there was the gun I ultimately chose. My father is upset because he thinks it is ugly and holds no value what so ever. As soon as I held this rifle I knew it was mine, do not really know how to describe the feeling. It has an issue where if the stock is pointing down it will lose its bolt, my father has it currently because he is the one who wants first shot just in case it blows up. I am curious if anyone can give me information on it. The only numbers and info I have are:
*White letters on stock 5BN 65
*S No 4 MK1
*Stamped US Property
*Magazine is not matching numbers, but everything else appears to be
*I believe my father said the serial number was 99c8104
hopefully in the next week or so I can get over to my dad's house and take pictures. I really do not care about value due to the fact it was my grandfather's rifle. Just facts would be awesome! It is beat up looking, and like I said the bolt falls out when held in a certain position but I like Ugly Betty, my father not so much.
Information
|
Warning: This is a relatively older thread This discussion is older than 360 days. Some information contained in it may no longer be current. |
|
-
12-10-2014 01:53 PM
# ADS
Friends and Sponsors
-
Advisory Panel
You have a US property Savage arms .303 service rifle. Good choice. I seriously doubt it will blow up as it's sounds like it's fired more ammo than you all collectively have seen. They're strong and reliable and if you look through the threads here there's a plethora of info about Savage rifles...
-
-
-
Legacy Member
Welcome to the Milsurps Forum. Congratulations on your choice, a No4 Mk1 made by Savage, the well known US arms maker. and supplied to British
Commonwealth forces during and after WW2 under the lend lease scheme. Cant really help on the stock markings, 5th Battalion 65th division ? but I dont think they are front line unit markings. perhaps used in training, reserve or home service. The bolt problem, is the bolt head clipped in to the rail on the right of the receiver?
No-one here will think its ugly.
Now get some pics up as soon as you get your hands on it.
Roy
Last edited by Roy; 12-10-2014 at 03:33 PM.
Keep Calm
and
Fix Bayonets
-
-
-
-
Legacy Member

Originally Posted by
ParkAvenue
.............. I like Ugly Betty, my father not so much.
That is not a very nice thing to say about your Father - show some respect young man !!!!!!
Mine are not the best, but they are not too bad. I can think of lots of Enfields I'd rather have but instead of constantly striving for more, sometimes it's good to be satisfied with what one has...
-
-
Advisory Panel
So it's safe to say your Dad didn't marry her then? 
Forgive me, but I was wondering why Grandma was only letting you have one gun each from the collection?
“There are invisible rulers who control the destinies of millions. It is not generally realized to what extent the words and actions of our most influential public men are dictated by shrewd persons operating behind the scenes.”
Edward Bernays, 1928
Much changes, much remains the same. 
-
-
Legacy Member
You said, "if the stock is pointing down it loses its bolt". Do you mean the rifle bolt falls out, or the stock bolt falls out?
-
-
FREE MEMBER
NO Posting or PM's Allowed

Originally Posted by
Alan de Enfield
That is not a very nice thing to say about your Father - show some respect young man !!!!!!
I'm assuming he meant his father doesn't like Ugly Betty. Not "I don't like my father".
-
Legacy Member

Originally Posted by
Quantrill
I'm assuming he meant his father doesn't like Ugly Betty. Not "I don't like my father".
Americans and English - one nation divided by two languages.
Mine are not the best, but they are not too bad. I can think of lots of Enfields I'd rather have but instead of constantly striving for more, sometimes it's good to be satisfied with what one has...
-
-
Advisory Panel
Yes, except that "off his horse" is not a subordinate clause and therefore no comma is required.
They meant well, anyway.
Last edited by Surpmil; 12-16-2014 at 11:29 AM.
“There are invisible rulers who control the destinies of millions. It is not generally realized to what extent the words and actions of our most influential public men are dictated by shrewd persons operating behind the scenes.”
Edward Bernays, 1928
Much changes, much remains the same. 
-