+ Reply to Thread
Page 1 of 5 1 2 3 ... LastLast
Results 1 to 10 of 45

Thread: What ever happened to the MKS reweld case

Click here to increase the font size Click here to reduce the font size

Hybrid View

  1. #1
    FREE MEMBER
    NO Posting or PM's Allowed
    RBruce's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2009
    Last On
    10-13-2019 @ 08:28 AM
    Location
    Raleigh, NC
    Age
    80
    Posts
    661
    Local Date
    06-09-2024
    Local Time
    01:34 PM

    What ever happened to the MKS reweld case

    There was some lawyer in Maryland, I think, who was attempting to get the BATF to change their ruling on the receivers. I haven't heard anything on that is several years.
    Information
    Warning: This is a relatively older thread
    This discussion is older than 360 days. Some information contained in it may no longer be current.

  2. #2
    FREE MEMBER
    NO Posting or PM's Allowed
    TdK's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2009
    Last On
    03-30-2014 @ 11:30 AM
    Location
    Southeast Michigan Too close to Kwametown for comfort
    Posts
    5
    Local Date
    06-09-2024
    Local Time
    01:34 PM
    The BATF exercised the "Once a machine gun always a machine gun" fallacy and got a Federal judge to uphold it. everyone lost the receivers and Mike Kelley spent some time in the pokey and is probably the defendant in a thousand lawsuits from the buyers he screwed.

    Hope that brings you up to speed

  3. Avoid Ads - Become a Contributing Member - Click HERE
  4. #3
    Deceased August 5th, 2016 goo's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2009
    Last On
    08-29-2009 @ 03:01 PM
    Location
    mattituck new york
    Posts
    504
    Local Date
    06-09-2024
    Local Time
    01:34 PM
    i've always wondered about m1 carbines. as far as i know there isn't much difference between the m1 and m2 reciever. so can either be made into a maching gun with the proper parts installed?
    the same question applies to ar15's.
    ..
    10-q, goo
    hey, the only dumb question is the one you don't ask.

    ...
    http://farm4.static.flickr.com/3487/...b9720d.jpg?v=0

  5. #4
    Contributing Member Mark in Rochester's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2009
    Last On
    Yesterday @ 05:55 PM
    Location
    Rochester, New York
    Posts
    6,734
    Real Name
    Mark in Rochester
    Local Date
    06-09-2024
    Local Time
    01:34 PM
    IIRC there is no difference between a M1icon carbine receiver and an M2 receiver except the M2 marking
    He is no fool who gives what he cannot keep to gain that which he cannot lose
    There are no great men, only great challenges that ordinary men are forced by circumstances to meet.

  6. #5
    FREE MEMBER
    NO Posting or PM's Allowed
    machinist's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2009
    Last On
    04-14-2016 @ 03:17 PM
    Posts
    2
    Local Date
    06-09-2024
    Local Time
    12:34 PM

    M2 carbine

    I have read that the BATFU says that the possession of an M1 carbine and a stripped M2 trigger housing, not on the gun, is conspiracy to manufacture a machine gun (like having an M16icon hammer in your AR15 or having a spare barrel for your Uzi rifle that is less than 16", even if you don't install it).

  7. #6
    Deceased August 5th, 2016 goo's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2009
    Last On
    08-29-2009 @ 03:01 PM
    Location
    mattituck new york
    Posts
    504
    Local Date
    06-09-2024
    Local Time
    01:34 PM

    whut does IIRC mean?

    Quote Originally Posted by Mark in Rochester View Post
    IIRC there is no difference between a M1icon carbine receiver and an M2 receiver except the M2 marking
    thank you,
    goo

  8. #7
    FREE MEMBER
    NO Posting or PM's Allowed
    KarlKW's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2009
    Last On
    01-03-2012 @ 10:24 AM
    Location
    Washington County, Maryland
    Posts
    55
    Local Date
    06-09-2024
    Local Time
    01:34 PM

    Meaning of IIRC

    Quote Originally Posted by goo View Post
    Whut is the meaning of IIRC?
    Goo, IIRC means "If I recall correctly." HTH (Hope this helps) KarlKW

  9. #8
    Deceased August 5th, 2016 goo's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2009
    Last On
    08-29-2009 @ 03:01 PM
    Location
    mattituck new york
    Posts
    504
    Local Date
    06-09-2024
    Local Time
    01:34 PM
    so an m1 carbine reciever is not a machinegun but an m14 reciever is?
    ...
    Machine Gun Granny - Funny Videos - Jokeroo.com is Jokes

  10. #9
    FREE MEMBER
    NO Posting or PM's Allowed
    Jim K's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2009
    Last On
    12-01-2009 @ 03:41 PM
    Posts
    505
    Local Date
    06-09-2024
    Local Time
    01:34 PM
    Sorry, folks, but that "once a machinegun..." is the way the law (GCAicon '68) is written, not some BATFE "fallacy". The law and the legislative history are clear; Congress intended that it should not be legal in any way to make a machinegun into a non-machinegun. The whole thing grew out the intent to ban future DEWAT programs, when ATTD (predecessor of BATFE) allowed machineguns to be welded up and removed from all firearms controls as "non guns." (Like table lamps, as an ATTD agent told me.) Some folks, with a lot of publicity, "re-watted" those guns, and the whole thing became a big scandal with the anti-gun gang up to their usual fear mongering and hatred of guns and gun owners. So Congress changed the definition of a machinegun along with import bans, etc.

    As to "M2" carbines, BATFE takes the basic position that a gun is what it says it is, and an M2 carbine is a machinegun. FWIW, I know of no ruling that an M2 trigger housing, either by itself or on an M1icon carbine, is a machinegun or that possession is illegal. Can anyone cite something official? (No, not the cousin of a friend said that someone told him....)

    Jim

  11. #10
    FREE MEMBER
    NO Posting or PM's Allowed
    edlmann's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2009
    Last On
    05-06-2016 @ 09:29 PM
    Posts
    122
    Local Date
    06-09-2024
    Local Time
    01:34 PM
    Quote Originally Posted by Jim K View Post
    FWIW, I know of no ruling that an M2 trigger housing, either by itself or on an M1icon carbine, is a machinegun or that possession is illegal. Can anyone cite something official? (No, not the cousin of a friend said that someone told him....)
    Click here for ATF's position on this.

    It says, in part, "The above parts consisting of an M2 selector lever, selector lever spring, disconnector lever assembly, M2 disconnector, disconnector spring, disconnector plunger and M2 hammer are classified as a machinegun. These parts are used specifically for fully automatic fire and have no application in a semiautomatic carbine. While other parts such as an M2 sear, operating slide, trigger housing and stock are used in the fully automatic carbine, these parts are also appropriate for use insemiautomatic M1 carbines. Therefore, the M2 sear, operating slide, trigger housing and stock are not a combination of parts designed and intended for use in converting a weapon into a machinegun."

    I disagree about the hammer. Plainfield used to ship their M-1 carbines with M-2 hammers, using a washer to take up the space occupied by the M-2 disconnector. Proceed at your own risk.

+ Reply to Thread
Page 1 of 5 1 2 3 ... LastLast

Similar Threads

  1. reweld?
    By geberl in forum M1 Garand/M14/M1A Rifles
    Replies: 7
    Last Post: 06-10-2009, 11:25 AM
  2. What would have happened if I tried to shoot this??
    By Bayou in forum M1 Garand/M14/M1A Rifles
    Replies: 5
    Last Post: 05-03-2009, 10:05 AM
  3. What happened after FTR.
    By Butch Parker in forum The Lee Enfield Knowledge Library Collectors Forum
    Replies: 1
    Last Post: 10-19-2007, 06:42 AM

Tags for this Thread

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts