+ Reply to Thread
Results 1 to 10 of 45

Thread: What ever happened to the MKS reweld case

Click here to increase the font size Click here to reduce the font size

Hybrid View

  1. #1
    FREE MEMBER
    NO Posting or PM's Allowed
    Jim K's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2009
    Last On
    12-01-2009 @ 03:41 PM
    Posts
    505
    Local Date
    07-05-2025
    Local Time
    10:35 AM
    Sorry, folks, but that "once a machinegun..." is the way the law (GCAicon '68) is written, not some BATFE "fallacy". The law and the legislative history are clear; Congress intended that it should not be legal in any way to make a machinegun into a non-machinegun. The whole thing grew out the intent to ban future DEWAT programs, when ATTD (predecessor of BATFE) allowed machineguns to be welded up and removed from all firearms controls as "non guns." (Like table lamps, as an ATTD agent told me.) Some folks, with a lot of publicity, "re-watted" those guns, and the whole thing became a big scandal with the anti-gun gang up to their usual fear mongering and hatred of guns and gun owners. So Congress changed the definition of a machinegun along with import bans, etc.

    As to "M2" carbines, BATFE takes the basic position that a gun is what it says it is, and an M2 carbine is a machinegun. FWIW, I know of no ruling that an M2 trigger housing, either by itself or on an M1icon carbine, is a machinegun or that possession is illegal. Can anyone cite something official? (No, not the cousin of a friend said that someone told him....)

    Jim
    Information
    Warning: This is a relatively older thread
    This discussion is older than 360 days. Some information contained in it may no longer be current.

  2. #2
    FREE MEMBER
    NO Posting or PM's Allowed
    edlmann's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2009
    Last On
    05-06-2016 @ 09:29 PM
    Posts
    122
    Local Date
    07-05-2025
    Local Time
    10:35 AM
    Quote Originally Posted by Jim K View Post
    FWIW, I know of no ruling that an M2 trigger housing, either by itself or on an M1icon carbine, is a machinegun or that possession is illegal. Can anyone cite something official? (No, not the cousin of a friend said that someone told him....)
    Click here for ATF's position on this.

    It says, in part, "The above parts consisting of an M2 selector lever, selector lever spring, disconnector lever assembly, M2 disconnector, disconnector spring, disconnector plunger and M2 hammer are classified as a machinegun. These parts are used specifically for fully automatic fire and have no application in a semiautomatic carbine. While other parts such as an M2 sear, operating slide, trigger housing and stock are used in the fully automatic carbine, these parts are also appropriate for use insemiautomatic M1 carbines. Therefore, the M2 sear, operating slide, trigger housing and stock are not a combination of parts designed and intended for use in converting a weapon into a machinegun."

    I disagree about the hammer. Plainfield used to ship their M-1 carbines with M-2 hammers, using a washer to take up the space occupied by the M-2 disconnector. Proceed at your own risk.

+ Reply to Thread

Similar Threads

  1. reweld?
    By geberl in forum M1 Garand/M14/M1A Rifles
    Replies: 7
    Last Post: 06-10-2009, 11:25 AM
  2. What would have happened if I tried to shoot this??
    By Bayou in forum M1 Garand/M14/M1A Rifles
    Replies: 5
    Last Post: 05-03-2009, 10:05 AM
  3. What happened after FTR.
    By Butch Parker in forum The Lee Enfield Knowledge Library Collectors Forum
    Replies: 1
    Last Post: 10-19-2007, 06:42 AM

Tags for this Thread

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts