I was wondering if there is a possible correlation between how well a carbine feeds (functions) and how new of a condition, or old and worn it is.
My original Inland is 95% to 98% finish and an ME of less than 1 (probably about "0").
My Standard Products mix-master's barreled receiver (and most other parts, too) is about 90%+ original finish, and an ME of between 1 and 2.
Both appear to have been shot very little, compared to many of the carbines I have had. Both function flawlessly with GI 30 rounders, no matter what ammo I use.
Granted, I replaced recoil springs in both prior to shooting, as a matter of course, and ejector and extractor springs in the mix-master. I still wonder, however, if old, much more used carbines are more prone to malfunction than lesser used ones.
While this is no way scientific, I wonder what experiences others have hadInformation
![]()
Warning: This is a relatively older thread
This discussion is older than 360 days. Some information contained in it may no longer be current.