+ Reply to Thread
Results 1 to 6 of 6

Thread: Yugo M-53 compared to MG-42, what are the differences?

Click here to increase the font size Click here to reduce the font size

Hybrid View

flying pig Yugo M-53 compared to MG-42,... 05-15-2013, 05:29 PM
browningautorifle I'll bet if you examine a few... 05-15-2013, 08:46 PM
RCS The post war MG42 had... 05-15-2013, 09:28 PM
arado The measure of any weapon is... 05-16-2013, 07:12 AM
Warren The SARAC M53 and the German... 05-19-2013, 10:34 AM
fjruple The angle of the grip stick... 05-20-2013, 07:36 AM
  1. #1
    Contributing Member flying pig's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2012
    Last On
    Yesterday @ 10:43 AM
    Location
    BC, Canada
    Posts
    319
    Local Date
    05-16-2025
    Local Time
    12:21 AM

    Yugo M-53 compared to MG-42, what are the differences?

    Wondering what the differences are between a Yugoslavian M-53 and a Germanicon MG-42? Is the M-53 more or less a post war redesignation of the MG-42 or is it a post war build or?

    Thanks! Wasn't sure quite where to put this...
    Information
    Warning: This is a relatively older thread
    This discussion is older than 360 days. Some information contained in it may no longer be current.

  2. #2
    Advisory Panel browningautorifle's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2008
    Last On
    Today @ 12:18 AM
    Location
    Victoria BC
    Posts
    31,046
    Real Name
    Jim
    Local Date
    05-16-2025
    Local Time
    12:21 AM
    I'll bet if you examine a few of them you'd find Germanicon parts employed. I'd say they're just about spot on MG42. They copied everything else...bayonets, rifles...
    Regards, Jim

  3. Avoid Ads - Become a Contributing Member - Click HERE
  4. #3
    Legacy Member RCS's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2009
    Last On
    Yesterday @ 09:09 PM
    Location
    USA
    Posts
    4,468
    Real Name
    Robert Seccombe
    Local Date
    05-16-2025
    Local Time
    02:21 AM
    The post war MG42 had different weight bolts to control the cyclic rate not certain what was used in the M53

  5. Thank You to RCS For This Useful Post:


  6. #4
    Deceased arado's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2007
    Last On
    12-21-2013 @ 04:35 PM
    Location
    sw ohio
    Posts
    453
    Local Date
    05-16-2025
    Local Time
    02:21 AM
    The measure of any weapon is how long it remains in front line service. The MG42 still is.The Tokarev pistol is. The PPSH is. All WW2 veterans.

  7. #5
    Advisory Panel
    Warren's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2006
    Last On
    05-09-2025 @ 04:04 PM
    Posts
    1,212
    Local Date
    05-16-2025
    Local Time
    03:21 AM
    The SARAC M53 and the Germanicon MG 42 are identical with only very small individual manufacturing differences. Most M53's do not have the AA sight boss and the sling link on the barrel jacket. Most if not all components will interchange and if they don't it is usually just a slight manufacturing difference but all are minor in nature and can easily modified to fit either unit. The later German MG 3 heavy bolt will fit both the WW II MG42 and the SARAC M 53 and cut the cyclic rate down to a manageable 950 rounds per minute. The finish on the SARAC M53 is normally a bit rougher than most WW II 42's. Some SARAC M53's have almost a commercial type blue finish but they are few and far between....most are a bit rough. The Layfette tripod mount is totally interchangeable with many of the Yugoicon tripods being German WW II having the range plate changed and the "dirty birds" painted over. Check any YUGO M 53 tripod over closely as there is a good chance it is a German WW II issue. The butt stock on the SARAC M 53 is normally wire bound with three or four wraps of wire. The wood is not the same quality as the German WW II wood butts.
    One interesting thing is that in most WW II photo's you see of a German MG crew, they are using the 34 and not the 42.

  8. The Following 2 Members Say Thank You to Warren For This Useful Post:


  9. #6
    Contributing Member fjruple's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2006
    Last On
    04-30-2025 @ 09:40 AM
    Location
    New Jersey, USA
    Posts
    1,054
    Real Name
    Franklin Ruple
    Local Date
    05-16-2025
    Local Time
    03:21 AM
    The angle of the grip stick of the M53 is at a different angle than the MG42. The M53 also does not use the front spider AAA sight of the MG42 even though the space for the AAA sight base is stamped into the receiver.

    Cheers

    --fjruple

+ Reply to Thread

Similar Threads

  1. 1903a3 bolt compared to 1903A4 sniper bolt
    By noonanda in forum M1903/1903A3/A4 Springfield Rifle
    Replies: 24
    Last Post: 02-23-2019, 12:18 AM
  2. Bren compared to its contemporaries
    By Tom-M in forum The Bren LMG (Light Machine Gun)
    Replies: 111
    Last Post: 02-03-2012, 11:37 AM
  3. Buttplate differences
    By Garandrew in forum The Lee Enfield Knowledge Library Collectors Forum
    Replies: 5
    Last Post: 12-03-2010, 03:15 PM
  4. Carbines compared
    By bouletbill in forum The Lee Enfield Knowledge Library Collectors Forum
    Replies: 0
    Last Post: 10-31-2010, 05:59 PM
  5. Barrel Differences
    By Sons of Alvin Linden in forum M1903/1903A3/A4 Springfield Rifle
    Replies: 0
    Last Post: 03-27-2010, 10:12 AM

Tags for this Thread

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
Loading...