+ Reply to Thread
Results 1 to 7 of 7

Thread: Questions about Saginaw Carbine

Click here to increase the font size Click here to reduce the font size

Hybrid View

  1. #1
    Legacy Member jbrid's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2009
    Last On
    08-01-2020 @ 01:26 AM
    Location
    Friendswood, TX
    Posts
    38
    Local Date
    05-06-2025
    Local Time
    12:26 PM

    Questions about Saginaw Carbine

    I recently purchased a Saginaw M1icon Carbine at an auction. Just now starting to go through it, and I'm seeing some things that are different from the information in Craig Riesch's book, so I'm puzzled at this point. Serial number is 3253xxx, so the carbine is early in the first serial number block for Saginaw. Receiver is clearly marked "Saginaw S G" with no periods (.) after the S or the G, as shown in the receiver marking table in Riesch's book. The forward receiver lug has a "J" stamped on it, and there is a "C" stamped on the flat about an inch in front of the gas piston, markings that aren't mentioned in the book. The real puzzle is that the receiver has a narrow locking tang, not the wide locking tang that Riesch's book says it should have.

    A lot of the other parts appear to be correct - trigger housing, bolt and op slide are all marked SG, and the barrel is marked Saginaw S.G. Div/General Motors in two lines.

    Basic question I have -- has anyone seen similar receiver markings and the narrow locking tang on Saginaw carbines?
    Information
    Warning: This is a relatively older thread
    This discussion is older than 360 days. Some information contained in it may no longer be current.

  2. #2
    Legacy Member bobg's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2009
    Last On
    09-01-2022 @ 01:44 AM
    Posts
    77
    Local Date
    05-06-2025
    Local Time
    10:26 AM
    I have several Saginaw's with the narrow tang.

  3. Avoid Ads - Become a Contributing Member - Click HERE
  4. #3
    Moderator
    (Deceased January 2016)


    Harlan (Deceased)'s Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2009
    Last On
    01-04-2016 @ 04:42 PM
    Location
    Texas - USA
    Age
    66
    Posts
    3,727
    Real Name
    Harlan
    Local Date
    05-06-2025
    Local Time
    11:26 AM
    jbrid,

    Don't put everything in Craig Riesch's book..... He was accurate some of the time, but wrong in many occasions. Craig Riesch's book was an early M1icon carbine book, but 'Ruth' later wrote books (WAR BABY series) that are much more accurate.

  5. #4
    Legacy Member kar66's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2010
    Last On
    03-26-2025 @ 12:09 PM
    Location
    California, Mo.
    Posts
    141
    Local Date
    05-06-2025
    Local Time
    12:26 PM
    I think if you will check the copyright dates you will find Ruth's first book is older than Riesch's book. Ruth just had access to more and better information.

  6. #5
    Moderator
    (Deceased Nov 16th, 2019)

    JimF4M1s (Deceased)'s Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2009
    Last On
    01-01-2025 @ 05:49 PM
    Location
    USA
    Age
    75
    Posts
    3,439
    Local Date
    05-06-2025
    Local Time
    10:26 AM
    All books have errors in them, including the Ruth books. We extend our knowledge as new, or unknown before, information is found. That's my main reason for having a large M1icon carbine library. I even have the Larsen book, because it shows so many repo parts. The Riesch book is a nice, quick, reference for the price. Extending your library can cost as much or more then the cost of purchasing a carbine.


    My first Ruth book, is from 1979.


  7. Thank You to JimF4M1s (Deceased) For This Useful Post:


  8. #6
    Advisory Panel browningautorifle's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2008
    Last On
    Today @ 09:08 AM
    Location
    Victoria BC
    Posts
    31,021
    Real Name
    Jim
    Local Date
    05-06-2025
    Local Time
    10:26 AM
    Same here, the first thing you learn is the books are all specific. The second thing is they seldom agree. I too have several different authors. Wouldn't get rid of any of them.
    Regards, Jim

  9. #7
    Legacy Member jbrid's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2009
    Last On
    08-01-2020 @ 01:26 AM
    Location
    Friendswood, TX
    Posts
    38
    Local Date
    05-06-2025
    Local Time
    12:26 PM
    Thread Starter
    Thanks to everyone for their comments. As suggested, I've done some more research using Ruth's "War Baby" book. The receiver has the narrow tang as shown in fig 383 on page 433 but there are 2 key differences from this figure: There is no "SG" on the left side of the receiver and behind the rear sight the receiver is marked "Saginaw SG", without periods after the S or the G. I suspect that the differences between my receiver and the one illustrated are due to my receiver being earlier in Saginaw's carbine production effort than the one shown in this figure (mine 3253xxx vs. 3265004). It does look like that both SG and S. G. in marking parts at least --- the trigger housing in marked SG (without periods) while the slide is marked S. G. (with periods). Again, thanks to everyone for the help and advice.

    Jim (jbrid).

  10. Thank You to jbrid For This Useful Post:


+ Reply to Thread

Similar Threads

  1. Saginaw M1 carbine
    By Mikesm44 in forum M1/M2 Carbine
    Replies: 23
    Last Post: 12-08-2013, 06:04 PM
  2. The other new carbine Saginaw SG 3.5
    By Curt in forum M1/M2 Carbine
    Replies: 11
    Last Post: 11-26-2012, 07:20 PM
  3. Questions, Questions Saginaw S'G'
    By Old-Win in forum M1/M2 Carbine
    Replies: 3
    Last Post: 12-02-2009, 10:57 AM
  4. Saginaw SG carbine
    By jppard in forum M1/M2 Carbine
    Replies: 3
    Last Post: 08-03-2009, 08:51 PM
  5. Saginaw SG carbine sight
    By jppard in forum M1/M2 Carbine
    Replies: 2
    Last Post: 06-17-2009, 11:29 AM

Tags for this Thread

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts