Results 1 to 10 of 36

Thread: No.4 300 Winchester Magnum Test

Click here to increase the font size Click here to reduce the font size

Threaded View

  1. #11
    Legacy Member Alan de Enfield's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2007
    Last On
    Today @ 06:17 PM
    Location
    Y Felinheli, Gogledd Cymru
    Posts
    2,753
    Real Name
    Alan De Enfield
    Local Date
    06-27-2025
    Local Time
    04:36 AM
    Quote Originally Posted by Maple_Leaf_Eh View Post
    Why bother? Salting explosives-loaded ammunition in enemy ammunition dumps is nothing new. So, just who is the enemy in all this testing?

    I am curious why tempt fate rechambering a No.4 to .300 WM, when P14s in .300WM are a well known and long trusted conversion?
    The argument from the NRA is that No4 actions are 'suspect'

    There would be little point in using the argument that a P14 is 'OK'.

    Compare Apples to apples !!!
    Mine are not the best, but they are not too bad. I can think of lots of Enfields I'd rather have but instead of constantly striving for more, sometimes it's good to be satisfied with what one has...

  2. Thank You to Alan de Enfield For This Useful Post:


Similar Threads

  1. .30 Carbine vs .357 Magnum
    By Art in forum M1/M2 Carbine
    Replies: 21
    Last Post: 01-03-2013, 12:58 AM
  2. test photo Winchester #191700
    By drweiler in forum Pattern 1913/1914 and M1917 Rifles
    Replies: 4
    Last Post: 03-12-2010, 08:00 AM
  3. Magnum Primers
    By Radiodude in forum M1/M2 Carbine
    Replies: 1
    Last Post: 10-03-2009, 07:13 PM
  4. Magnum primers
    By mongo in forum Ammunition and Reloading for Old Milsurps
    Replies: 2
    Last Post: 09-23-2009, 09:38 PM
  5. 44 Magnum loads-Considering Gas Checks
    By garandman57 in forum Ammunition and Reloading for Old Milsurps
    Replies: 5
    Last Post: 04-17-2009, 01:19 AM

Tags for this Thread

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts