Results 1 to 10 of 29

Thread: No 8 .22 rifles coming out of service

Click here to increase the font size Click here to reduce the font size

Threaded View

  1. #20
    Legacy Member Alan de Enfield's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2007
    Last On
    Today @ 05:23 PM
    Location
    Y Felinheli, Gogledd Cymru
    Posts
    2,723
    Real Name
    Alan De Enfield
    Local Date
    05-11-2025
    Local Time
    12:19 AM
    Quote Originally Posted by DaveWales View Post
    One question I do have is how much interest is there / was there in trying to save the remaining No.8’s? I know this was looked at a few years ago.
    You probably know but the :

    No7 Mk1 was ordered by the RAF. Apparently 2500 were ordered and some 2000 (ish) supplied with the remaining (un assembled) actions being sold off. A few went to the USAicon and Brian Dickicon acquired some and had the bolt head and ejectors manufactured locally.

    No 9 is also marked as N9 Some 3,000 were ordered from PH for the Navy

    Production commenced in 1956, although we have yet to see a rifle dated prior to 1957, (i.e. P-H 57 as above). Of the 3,000 or so rifles apparently manufactured for the Royal Navy contract between 1956 and 1960, the serial numbers did not attain four figures until during 1958, and were marked as the Pattern Room example and the example shown above. The highest "A" prefixed number of which we are aware is A2828 - a rifle sold at Bonhams London auction in 2004. Later rifles produced by Parker-Hale had the markings engraved, as on the rifle shown higher up this page, and the serial numbers became five-figured with the prefix "PH". We have no information regarding the quantity of these rifles marketed, there being no information readily available relating to serial numbering. It is known that later 'reproductions' of the No.9 were produced by a well-known gunsmith in Birmingham in the late 1990s, using various spares. These too were produced with the usual beechwood furniture, and are very difficult to tell apart from rifles of original commercial manufacture.; indeed, even the PARKERIFLING marking was included on the barrel's crown. Whether or not the barrel carries modern proof, normally under the front section of the barrel ahead of the fore-end nose piece, could be a give-away here. Original rifles should also be fitted with the alloy butt-plate.

    The Pattern Room collection's rifle is presumed to be a mid-production example marked "N." for Navy, whilst those later production rifles with the PH serial number prefix had this transposed to "No." and the markings, as shown on the rifle on this page, were engraved rather than stamped. That these rifles were notated "9" is something on which the reader may muse, particularly with regard to discussion above about Britishicon or Enfield Rifleicon numbering.


    https://www.rifleman.org.uk/Enfield_Rifle_No.9.html
    Mine are not the best, but they are not too bad. I can think of lots of Enfields I'd rather have but instead of constantly striving for more, sometimes it's good to be satisfied with what one has...

  2. Thank You to Alan de Enfield For This Useful Post:


Similar Threads

  1. Rarity of Original Pre-WW1 Service Rifles
    By EdwardB in forum M1903/1903A3/A4 Springfield Rifle
    Replies: 91
    Last Post: 04-14-2015, 07:47 AM
  2. Does anyone know if sniper rifles were issued to 2nd AIF for service in Middle east
    By gwahlert in forum The Lee Enfield Knowledge Library Collectors Forum
    Replies: 20
    Last Post: 08-05-2012, 03:15 AM
  3. Elevation comeups for all service rifles - M1/3006, M14 with M872?
    By beekeeper in forum M1 Garand/M14/M1A Rifles
    Replies: 1
    Last Post: 08-30-2010, 08:42 AM
  4. 1879 Lee Link (Posting in "Other U.S. Service Rifles" Forum)
    By jmoore in forum The Lee Enfield Knowledge Library Collectors Forum
    Replies: 2
    Last Post: 07-26-2010, 01:31 AM

Tags for this Thread

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts