1. It appears that you are you're enjoying our Military Surplus Collectors Forums, but haven't created an account yet. As an unregistered guest, your are unable to post and are limited to the amount of viewing time you will receive, so why not take a minute to Register for your own free account now? As a member you get free access to our forums and knowledge libraries, plus the ability to post your own messages and communicate directly with other members. So, if you'd like to join our community, please CLICK HERE to Register !

    Already a member? Login at the top right corner of this page to stop seeing this message.

Results 1 to 4 of 4
Click here to increase the font size Click here to reduce the font size

Threaded View

  1. #4
    Legacy Member enbloc8's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2009
    Last On
    06-07-2025 @ 08:13 PM
    Posts
    237
    Local Date
    07-03-2025
    Local Time
    11:14 AM
    Quote Originally Posted by AZMPiKM View Post
    Hello all. I recently came into an Australianicon SLR parts build on an Imbel reciever and have a few questions about it. Please forgive me if these are common knowledge. I have several metric pattern FALs but am relatively new to the commonwealth pattern.

    1. My rifles serial number is AD7102188 when new would it have had a phosphate finish or paint over phosphate? Furniture would have been wood with laminate handguards?
    Your rifle was made for West Malaysia. From the factory, it would have had the plain phosphate finish, and coachwood furniture with laminate handguards. The finish change to black stoving paint took place the following year.

    2. Were these guns FTRed and if so how were they marked?
    From what I've seen in pictures, some FTR'd rifles had the serial number ground off and reapplied in whatever size and mode was standard of the day (e.g. inverted after 1971, or [on the upper] aligned with the forward edge of the lightening cut on the magazine well) with "FTR XX" below it. E.g. an older rifle rebuilt in 1972 would have had an inverted serial number with "FTR 72" below it. Whether that was unique to Lithgow, or also used at the base-level rebuild facilities, I don't know.

    3. Did the Australians use marynyl furniture? Would the wood and plastic be mixed on the same rifle? As it sits now my rifle has a wood stock and grip with UK plastic handguards. Would this have been an approved configuration?
    Australia did not use Maranyl beyond testing. What West Malaysia may have done, I don't know. However, I understand the combination you describe was common on Britishicon rifles (those not rebuilt with full Maranyl) in later years.
    Last edited by enbloc8; 10-16-2020 at 11:16 PM. Reason: I can't HTML.

Similar Threads

  1. Off of forend questions for a while, on to rear handguard identification questions...
    By Garandy in forum The Lee Enfield Knowledge Library Collectors Forum
    Replies: 12
    Last Post: 03-31-2019, 10:09 AM
  2. Australian M10 A2
    By grey ghost in forum The Lee Enfield Knowledge Library Collectors Forum
    Replies: 8
    Last Post: 10-14-2012, 01:57 PM
  3. Australian L4's
    By DOD 7.62 in forum The Bren LMG (Light Machine Gun)
    Replies: 21
    Last Post: 09-18-2012, 09:45 AM
  4. 1941 Fazakerley No.4 Mk.1 missing pieces - questions, questions, questions....
    By spinecracker in forum The Lee Enfield Knowledge Library Collectors Forum
    Replies: 24
    Last Post: 11-05-2011, 05:31 PM
  5. 1938 Model Turkish Mauser - questions, questions...
    By spinecracker in forum Mauser Rifles
    Replies: 1
    Last Post: 08-28-2010, 10:46 PM

Tags for this Thread

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts