+ Reply to Thread
Results 1 to 10 of 60

Thread: 1941 Long Branch

Click here to increase the font size Click here to reduce the font size

Hybrid View

  1. #1
    Legacy Member spinecracker's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2009
    Last On
    08-18-2023 @ 08:38 AM
    Location
    Cheyenne, WY, USA
    Posts
    870
    Local Date
    07-06-2025
    Local Time
    06:43 AM
    Thread Starter
    The magazine is so worn, I can't really make out what is stamped on it. I will try and get a good close-up photo of the bolt handle and the magazine markings as soon as I can borrow my father-in-law's camera.

    I am inclined to think that this rifle, apart from light bubba'ing (may the miscreant suffer from boils in a very painful place), has not been tampered with or refurbished at any time. If someone can repair the rear sight, I would be VERY interested in knowing a price. As I said, if I can get this rifle restored, then I would be happy. If not, then someone gets a project gun lol.
    Information
    Warning: This is a relatively older thread
    This discussion is older than 360 days. Some information contained in it may no longer be current.

  2. #2
    Advisory Panel Surpmil's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2008
    Last On
    @
    Location
    West side
    Posts
    5,068
    Local Date
    07-06-2025
    Local Time
    06:43 AM
    Quote Originally Posted by spinecracker View Post
    I am inclined to think that this rifle, apart from light bubba'ing has not been tampered with or refurbished at any time. If someone can repair the rear sight, I would be VERY interested in knowing a price. As I said, if I can get this rifle restored, then I would be happy. If not, then someone gets a project gun lol.
    Much worse ones than this have been restored. Cut down barrels for example, have had two or three inches grafted on (smoothbore). Your tasks are simple here.

    If you don't want it, someone else will be glad to take it on.

    Go and visit some of the large parts houses in the US and explain what you're trying to do and ask berry, berry nicely if they'll let you look through their stock of stocks.

  3. #3
    Banned Edward Horton's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2008
    Last On
    09-10-2011 @ 01:42 PM
    Location
    Harrisburg, PA USA
    Age
    74
    Posts
    935
    Local Date
    07-06-2025
    Local Time
    09:43 AM
    spinecracker

    I don't know if you noticed but it looks like your fore stock was regulated by Fultons. Your trigger guard bushing was removed and the wood around the bushing has been cone shaped.

    Your fore stock.



    A fore stock that belongs to RJW NZicon that was regulated by Fultons.



    And a unmodified fore stock.



    And a fore stock with a hare trigger


  4. #4
    Advisory Panel Surpmil's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2008
    Last On
    @
    Location
    West side
    Posts
    5,068
    Local Date
    07-06-2025
    Local Time
    06:43 AM
    Quote Originally Posted by Edward Horton View Post
    spinecracker

    I don't know if you noticed but it looks like your fore stock was regulated by Fultons. Your trigger guard bushing was removed and the wood around the bushing has been cone shaped.
    That's standard on the MkI forends Ed. Notice the relief for the magazine cutoff on the forend in your photo.

    Someone has definitely hobbed out the barrel channel 'with extreme prejudice', no doubt having bright ideas about free-floating the barrel.

    And not being satisfied with that, then attacked the exterior.
    Last edited by Surpmil; 04-20-2010 at 12:53 PM.

  5. Thank You to Surpmil For This Useful Post:


  6. #5
    Banned Edward Horton's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2008
    Last On
    09-10-2011 @ 01:42 PM
    Location
    Harrisburg, PA USA
    Age
    74
    Posts
    935
    Local Date
    07-06-2025
    Local Time
    09:43 AM
    Quote Originally Posted by Surpmil View Post
    That's standard on the MkI forends Ed. Notice the relief for the magazine cutoff on the forend in your photo.

    Someone has definitely hobbed out the barrel channel 'with extreme prejudice', no doubt having bright ideas about free-floating the barrel.

    And not being satisfied with that, then attacked the exterior.
    I stand corrected and now wonder why the older mark fore stocks were enlarged at the bushing area???

    Thank you Surpmil

  7. #6
    Advisory Panel

    jmoore's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2009
    Last On
    06-09-2023 @ 04:20 AM
    Location
    US of A
    Posts
    7,066
    Local Date
    07-06-2025
    Local Time
    09:43 AM
    Quote Originally Posted by Surpmil View Post
    That's standard on the MkI forends Ed. Notice the relief for the magazine cutoff on the forend in your photo.
    "Canadianicon" Mk.I versus Mk.I*, yes?

    Although early Britishicon rifles seem to have the same "cone", I don't know if that feature was eliminated at the same time as the cut-out area for the magazine cutoff. Still, there ought to be a sleeve in between, unless the Canadian forestock is different. Having not seen the "innards" of such an early example before (Earliest I have is a "3L" w/o the "low wood" fore stock), I really am not knowing!

  8. #7
    Legacy Member spinecracker's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2009
    Last On
    08-18-2023 @ 08:38 AM
    Location
    Cheyenne, WY, USA
    Posts
    870
    Local Date
    07-06-2025
    Local Time
    06:43 AM
    Thread Starter
    Ed, I did note the cone-shaped hole, and was going to ask about it. Unfortunately, I somehow think the forestock no longer has any real value after being sanded down so much.

    I think the order in which the rifle should be restored is to get the hardest to find wood part first (e.g. correct fore-end with the lower right hand wall), then find and colour-match the rest of the wood parts (hand guards, buttstock). As correct fore-ends for 1941 Long Branches do not grow on trees (well, ok, they do, but you know what I mean), I think I am in for quite a wait lol. The only other part that I think will prove to be elusive is the LB-stamped Mk.1 micrometer sight - I am not holding my breath. If anyone on the forum has leads on these items, then please let me know
    Last edited by spinecracker; 04-20-2010 at 06:57 PM.

+ Reply to Thread

Similar Threads

  1. 1941 Long Branch
    By NP2650 in forum The Lee Enfield Knowledge Library Collectors Forum
    Replies: 13
    Last Post: 09-11-2009, 08:50 PM
  2. 1941 Long Branch No 4 Mk I (CGN Private Ad)
    By Badger in forum Appraisals, Fakery, Dispute Resolution & Mediation Forum
    Replies: 1
    Last Post: 08-22-2008, 12:49 AM

Tags for this Thread

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts