+ Reply to Thread
Results 1 to 10 of 12

Thread: No.4 Mk.I Fazackerly Forestocks, 1943

Click here to increase the font size Click here to reduce the font size

Hybrid View

jmoore No.4 Mk.I Fazackerly... 05-21-2010, 03:03 AM
Amatikulu I noticed the same on several... 05-21-2010, 06:31 AM
tbonesmith I've seen it on '42 and '43... 05-21-2010, 07:58 AM
krinko Here's two of mine---both... 05-21-2010, 09:30 PM
kar98k my 6/43 Fazakerely has it as... 05-21-2010, 10:42 PM
ANDYZ28 Mine to! Were serial#s... 05-30-2010, 08:30 AM
krinko Fazakerley didn't serialize... 05-30-2010, 10:39 AM
ANDYZ28 I examined the rifle very... 05-31-2010, 08:19 AM
mtykim my 3/43 Fazakerley only has... 05-30-2010, 12:18 PM
jmoore The serial number is likely a... 05-31-2010, 12:56 AM
ANDYZ28 My 1942 cLong Branch was... 06-03-2010, 11:21 PM
jmoore It wasn't. Ummm, feel free to... 06-04-2010, 06:19 AM
  1. #1
    FREE MEMBER
    NO Posting or PM's Allowed
    ANDYZ28's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2010
    Last On
    04-16-2017 @ 03:56 PM
    Posts
    25
    Local Date
    05-31-2025
    Local Time
    01:39 PM
    Quote Originally Posted by kar98k View Post
    my 6/43 Fazakerely has it as well
    Mine to!

    Were serial#s stamped/etched into/onto the magazines at Fazakerley (mine does not) as they were on the Long Branch No4s' (my 1942 does)?

    Thanks, Andy
    Information
    Warning: This is a relatively older thread
    This discussion is older than 360 days. Some information contained in it may no longer be current.

  2. #2
    Legacy Member krinko's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2008
    Last On
    01-28-2024 @ 02:39 PM
    Location
    Omaha-ha-ha, Nebraska
    Posts
    337
    Local Date
    05-31-2025
    Local Time
    12:39 PM
    Fazakerley didn't serialize magazines in WW2 production and neither did Longbranch----right into the '50 rifles.
    Numbers on these rifle's magazines were put on at a local level.
    -----krinko

  3. Thank You to krinko For This Useful Post:


  4. #3
    FREE MEMBER
    NO Posting or PM's Allowed
    ANDYZ28's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2010
    Last On
    04-16-2017 @ 03:56 PM
    Posts
    25
    Local Date
    05-31-2025
    Local Time
    01:39 PM
    Quote Originally Posted by krinko View Post
    Fazakerley didn't serialize magazines in WW2 production and neither did Longbranch----right into the '50 rifles.
    Numbers on these rifle's magazines were put on at a local level.
    -----krinko
    I examined the rifle very carefully this morning, and it appears to me to have been stamped at the time of manufacture. The stock and magazine have both serial numbers, or should I say both sets of numbers? The numbers on the magazine have been very deeply struck so as to actually dent the base of the magazine. Why are their two serial numbers?

    Thanks, Andy

+ Reply to Thread

Similar Threads

  1. Help with 1943, No 4 MK 1?
    By gwilmoth9188 in forum The Lee Enfield Knowledge Library Collectors Forum
    Replies: 2
    Last Post: 03-12-2010, 12:11 PM
  2. CMP and another M1 SA 1943, SOG ?
    By mac1911 in forum M1 Garand/M14/M1A Rifles
    Replies: 4
    Last Post: 02-11-2010, 03:51 PM
  3. Way to ID Canadian forestocks?
    By 218bee in forum The Lee Enfield Knowledge Library Collectors Forum
    Replies: 3
    Last Post: 11-13-2009, 03:59 PM
  4. Need some help - BSA 1943 No.4 Mk1
    By militariacollector in forum The Lee Enfield Knowledge Library Collectors Forum
    Replies: 6
    Last Post: 08-28-2009, 11:18 PM

Tags for this Thread

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
Loading...
Milsurps Voice Mail