No.4 Mk.I Fazackerly Forestocks, 1943

[krinko]

Fazakerley didn't serialize magazines in WW2 production and neither did Longbranch----right into the '50 rifles.
Numbers on these rifle's magazines were put on at a local level.
-----krinko

Information

Warning: This is a relatively older thread This discussion is older than 360 days. Some information contained in it may no longer be current.

[ANDYZ28]

Fazakerley didn't serialize magazines in WW2 production and neither did Longbranch----right into the '50 rifles.
Numbers on these rifle's magazines were put on at a local level.
-----krinko

I examined the rifle very carefully this morning, and it appears to me to have been stamped at the time of manufacture. The stock and magazine have both serial numbers, or should I say both sets of numbers? The numbers on the magazine have been very deeply struck so as to actually dent the base of the magazine. Why are their two serial numbers?

Thanks, Andy