show off your smle with volley sights

[snorli]

Here is a few.
Picture 1 from top:MkI Enfield 1904, MkI Sparkbrook 1904, MkI BSA 1904, MkI LSA 1904
Picture 2:Cond MkII Sparkbrook 1904, MkI* BSA 1907, MkI*** BSA 1905
Picture 3:MkIII Enfield 1907, MkIII Enfield 1908, MkIII Bsa 1908, MkIII LSA 1908
Picture 4:Cond MkIV Enfield 1908, MkIII Enfield 1910, MkI**I.P. BSA 1904, MkIII Enfield 1908
Picture 5:MkIII Enfield 1915, MkIII H.T.(Aust) Lithgow 1916/1945
Attachment 14411Attachment 14410Attachment 14409Attachment 14412Attachment 14413

Information

Warning: This is a relatively older thread This discussion is older than 360 days. Some information contained in it may no longer be current.

[Mk VII]

Strangely Brown showing a Mk.1 which he had the time.

http://www.fototime.com/%7B2FEE564A-....left.side.jpg

and a 1909 or so commercial Mk.III which I own.

http://www.fototime.com/740493E45A6903C/orig.jpg

[smle13]

beutiful rifles, anymore?

[Jollygreenslugg]

Picture 5:MkIII Enfield 1915, MkIII H.T.(Aust) Lithgow 1916/1945
Attachment 14413

Very nice rifles. I'm particularly interested in the last shot. I've never seen a Lithgow HT with original furniture. I understood that they were restocked in coachwood. At least every one I've seen has been so treated. Do you have any information on this rifle; is the forestock numbered to the rifle?

Cheers,
Matt

[RangeRover]

Just the one for me. A 1910 Enfield, all-matching, converted to No. 2 Mk IV in NZ in the 20s. Accurate as all get out.

[snorli]

Difficult to say, as the rifle has been renumbered when rebuilt to H.T. The number on the forestock do not match the new number on the rifle, however the buttstock bears clear Lithgow 1916 markings, and appears to match the forestock in appearence.