Define What is Correct

[DaveN]

I would rather collect a rifle that has most likely been in action then one that never left the states. In the mini series THE PACIFIC the girl has a choice. The captain that is in school in 44 and hasn't been out of the states yet, or the pfc who just got back from hell. Even though he's all dinged up and he's damaged the pfc gets the girl. True story.

I would rather collect history and be able to get 3 for the price of 1 collector grade rifle.
But that's just me.

Information

Warning: This is a relatively older thread This discussion is older than 360 days. Some information contained in it may no longer be current.

[mpd1978]

Poor condition doesnt mean history. Unless you can document a particular weapons use in the theater, I will take the collector grade ones and/or original ones . But thats just me, and to each his own.

I would rather collect a rifle that has most likely been in action then one that never left the states. In the mini series THE PACIFIC the girl has a choice. The captain that is in school in 44 and hasn't been out of the states yet, or the pfc who just got back from hell. Even though he's all dinged up and he's damaged the pfc gets the girl. True story.

I would rather collect history and be able to get 3 for the price of 1 collector grade rifle.
But that's just me.

[Bill Ricca]

Everybody will continue to describe their definitions of Correct and Original. I can tell you 20-30 years ago there was no question as to the definitions.

Original was the way it was delivered from the manufacturer to Ordnance.

Correct was either Original Part or a part or accessory that could have been issued during a specific time period.

Today everything has changed in the minds of many. I constantly see on the rifle boards a new guy asking for a "Correct" sling for a mid 1950's Garand. Some of the answers are warped out of sight.

Examples "Go to XYZ company and you can get a cotton web sling for $8.95"

or "ABC company has slings in either leather or web, both which could have been issued during that time".

The facts are web slings were in one supply system and by the mid 1960's they still had many left over from WWII. What a soldier was issued depended upon what the unit had in supply at that time. I remember in 1964 seeing "yellow slings" on a few M14's in basic training, but I did not know at that time what "Khaki" was.

When I try to correct the answers with "Our soldiers could not have been issued imported slings from India or China in the mid 1950's", or " In the 1950's nobody was issued a sling made last year", I get answers like "Originality is not important, only the color and product of the sling, so it looks like them".

It goes to show that many today (I estimate 95%) of the interest have no connection with the military history of this nation, or any connection with the guys and equipment that protected us. Things have changed greatly as far as attitude.

[Hercules Powder]

It goes to show that many today (I estimate 95%) of the interest have no connection with the military history of this nation, or any connection with the guys and equipment that protected us. Things have changed greatly as far as attitude.

Sad but true.

[painter777]

It goes to show that many today (I estimate 95%) of the interest have no connection with the military history of this nation, or any connection with the guys and equipment that protected us

Great post Mr. Ricca.

It's an insult to the men and women who carried these weapons by knowingly putting reproduction parts on these Historical Artifacts.
To Honor those whose countries had asked them to fight its battles.
To show the respect for those on the home front that sweat and sacrificed so much to put these weapons in our troops hands.
A country that bonded together at a grave time showing strength and determination along with its unmatched production skills set on the highest level.
Our job as collectors, or maybe better said... We the current caretakers- To care for and preserve these artifacts for future generations.

Charlie-painter777

[jmark]

Great post Mr. Ricca.

It's an insult to the men and women who carried these weapons by knowingly putting reproduction parts on these Historical Artifacts.
To Honor those whose countries had asked them to fight its battles.
To show the respect for those on the home front that sweat and sacrificed so much to put these weapons in our troops hands.
A country that bonded together at a grave time showing strength and determination along with its unmatched production skills set on the highest level.
Our job as collectors, or maybe better said... We the current caretakers- To care for and preserve these artifacts for future generations.

Charlie-painter777

http://i40.photobucket.com/albums/e2...9/DSC07358.jpg

Well said. We owe a lot to the greatest generation.