The so-called "Type" numbers were developed by Joe Poyer for use in his book. They have no basis in fact and are confusing. It is best to use a description rather than use the "Types". OxfordAndy did use a description in his initial post. I think Chuck's comment was meant to imply that the "Type" wasn't needed.Information
![]()
Warning: This is a relatively older thread
This discussion is older than 360 days. Some information contained in it may no longer be current.