Original Handstamped 6.9 Inland pics..

[Bill Hollinger]

Sorry Brian, I don't totally agree with you. Okay, it is in its original configuration but my belief is that sight has been banged on to be removed. A rack is not going to cause that kind of damage. That damage is from strikes to the back side of the sight.

Information

Warning: This is a relatively older thread This discussion is older than 360 days. Some information contained in it may no longer be current.

[BrianQ]

Sorry Brian, I don't totally agree with you. Okay, it is in its original configuration but my belief is that sight has been banged on to be removed. A rack is not going to cause that kind of damage. That damage is from strikes to the back side of the sight.

So you think someone took the front sight off this or another carbine. Put it on and re-staked both sides of the front sight pin using the same method Winchester did, but never bothered to replace the one non- Winchester part . A part that is very visible as well as very easy to obtain. It is also a part that no published integration records show should be there but occurs in a very narrow band in the 5.6 mil range.