That's a VERY interesting observation Ensci. I have to admit that while I and other Armourers knew that there was a difference in No5 part numbers between the No4 and 5 foresight blades, to us, they were all one and the same and fully interchangeable and even though we'd spend whole days on the test range, zeroing and accuracy testing, it was all done using No4 blades. I say 'No4' blades but what I mean is just the zillions of blades in the trays in the range hut. Even then, an angled blade was never apparent
What is also interesting is that I've just looked at 4 No5's here and just a tad over 1,000 foresight blades (if a heavy handfull equates to 100 or so guess that is.......) and they are ALL round fronted. Two of these No5's are definately ex Malaya/Borneo
Does anyone out there in forumland have an angled blade split base blade fitted to their No5 or have a photo of one. I just think that being so obvious, even the sleepiest Armourer in Malaya would have noticed or one of the MOR (local Malay Army) Armourers would have explained it.
Does anyone have a more up to date EMER than my 1957 edition that I bought back with me, that might elaborate on the change? It could unravel the last mystery of the No5 partsInformation
![]()
Warning: This is a relatively older thread
This discussion is older than 360 days. Some information contained in it may no longer be current.