-
FREE MEMBER
NO Posting or PM's Allowed
-
01-03-2012 11:08 AM
# ADS
Friends and Sponsors
-
Legacy Member
England
is the standard civilian mark that woult have been applied when the rifle was surplussed.
-
-
-
Are you sure about that Rob............... I saw thousands set aside for UK
MoD disposal and they weren't marked in any way. Maybe ENGLAND is a US Import mark perhaps
-
-
Legacy Member

Originally Posted by
dvacek50
Also, other rifles I have seen have R.A. Co. Ridgefield NJ and C.A.I. Georgia UT stampings. What is the significance of those stampings?
These are just the importer's stampings. US law requires the importers name and location to be marked on the rifle. No significance other than defacing nice old milsurps.
-
-
Legacy Member
Somebody at the importers thought all L-Es should be stamped ENGLAND, and did it.
Navy Arms and Century Arms International are just two importers who were required to mark their imports more clearly in recent years.
-
-
Legacy Member
My understanding is that all of those surplussed by/in the UK got the standard "England
, 18.5 tons, 2.22" Over the breech, presumably after they went thru a civilian proof house ... Please do correct me if I'm out to lunch here. Every Enfield I've ever handled (Except the Australian
ones) have such markings.
Are you sure about that Rob............... I saw thousands set aside for UK MoD disposal and they weren't marked in any way. Maybe ENGLAND is a US Import mark perhaps
-
-
Legacy Member
They did not. There are plenty of surplussed British weapons out there with the proof markings sans "England
". BTW...I've got an Aussie rifle with "Australia
" stamped on it. There are no British laws pertaining to marking country of origin on commercially proofed firearms, whereas such markings have been part of US import law since the early 20th century.
-
-
Legacy Member

Originally Posted by
RobSmith
My understanding is that all of those surplussed by/in the UK got the standard "
England
, 18.5 tons, 2.22" Over the breech, presumably after they went thru a civilian proof house ... Please do correct me if I'm out to lunch here. Every Enfield I've ever handled (Except the
Australian
ones) have such markings.
The 18.5 tons, 2.222" and BNP are UK Civilian proof markings that show it was at some time in Uk civilian hands prior to making its way to the USA
.
The England stamp was nothing to do with England / UK exporting the rifle - it was a US requirement for importation to show country of origin.
The England marking could be applied by a contractor (in the UK) commissioned by the US buyer, it was NOT applied by the UK Government - or it could be applied at the point of importation (maybe in a bonded warehouse) by the US buyer.
Mine are not the best, but they are not too bad. I can think of lots of Enfields I'd rather have but instead of constantly striving for more, sometimes it's good to be satisfied with what one has...
-
-
Contributing Member
England stamp

Originally Posted by
Alan de Enfield
The 18.5 tons, 2.222" and BNP are UK Civilian proof markings that show it was at some time in Uk civilian hands prior to making its way to the
USA
.
The
England
stamp was nothing to do with England / UK exporting the rifle - it was a US requirement for importation to show country of origin.
The England marking could be applied by a contractor (in the UK) commissioned by the US buyer, it was NOT applied by the UK Government - or it could be applied at the point of importation (maybe in a bonded warehouse) by the US buyer.
So, was the England stamp ever applied for Canadian
purposes? I'm wondering because a number of the Long Branch sniper rifles have "England" stamped on them, but they were not brought in via the US to my knowledge. Or, was it a case of them being stamped over in England on behalf of a North American importer before coming over here?
Thx
Ed
-
-
Deceased January 15th, 2016

Originally Posted by
RobSmith
England
is the standard civilian mark that woult have been applied when the rifle was surplussed.
As has been said many times. Not the case at all.