1. It appears that you are you're enjoying our Military Surplus Collectors Forums, but haven't created an account yet. As an unregistered guest, your are unable to post and are limited to the amount of viewing time you will receive, so why not take a minute to Register for your own free account now? As a member you get free access to our forums and knowledge libraries, plus the ability to post your own messages and communicate directly with other members. So, if you'd like to join our community, please CLICK HERE to Register !

    Already a member? Login at the top right corner of this page to stop seeing this message.

+ Reply to Thread
Results 1 to 10 of 96
Click here to increase the font size Click here to reduce the font size

Hybrid View

  1. #1
    Legacy Member gsimmons's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2010
    Last On
    06-08-2025 @ 01:16 PM
    Location
    Western North Carolina
    Posts
    1,368
    Local Date
    06-13-2025
    Local Time
    08:04 AM
    JM,
    They made the 1855 "style" blade to fit the .69 calibre muskets that were being made and converted in the 1850's. It is absolutely correct for that musket. The older style bayonet was used with the model 1840 flintlock musket(most were converted to percussion) and the early 1842's.


    Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
    Information
    Warning: This is a relatively older thread
    This discussion is older than 360 days. Some information contained in it may no longer be current.

  2. Thank You to gsimmons For This Useful Post:


  3. #2
    Advisory Panel

    jmoore's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2009
    Last On
    06-09-2023 @ 04:20 AM
    Location
    US of A
    Posts
    7,066
    Local Date
    06-13-2025
    Local Time
    09:04 AM
    Thread Starter
    Quote Originally Posted by gsimmons View Post
    JM,
    They made the 1855 "style" blade to fit the .69 calibre muskets that were being made and converted in the 1850's. It is absolutely correct for that musket. The older style bayonet was used with the model 1840 flintlock musket(most were converted to percussion) and the early 1842's.


    Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
    Ah, thanks! My few books on these early weapons are not hugely detailed, and are known to be "dated" (i.e. full of errors). If you would care to comment in the photo thread linked above (rather than the range report), I think readers would benefit from your knowledge!

    As you had not previously viewed the thread (hence your eligibility to answer!) you will find that the lock is dated 1851. So a slightly later bayonet doesn't hurt my feelings at all! Just happy to have one. Have yet to get a bayonet for my late 1816 type flintlock.

    On to the next mystery!:




    Mystery Sight P#30
    Last edited by jmoore; 03-23-2012 at 09:50 AM.

+ Reply to Thread

Similar Threads

  1. Guess the part ?
    By RCS in forum Vintage Military Gear
    Replies: 12
    Last Post: 07-26-2011, 11:22 PM
  2. Guess who ???
    By Emri in forum The Watering Hole OT (Off Topic) Forum
    Replies: 5
    Last Post: 03-16-2011, 12:43 PM
  3. Guess what I just won!
    By Bill Hollinger in forum M1903/1903A3/A4 Springfield Rifle
    Replies: 29
    Last Post: 10-04-2009, 01:36 AM
  4. Anyone care to guess the age of ?
    By RJW NZ in forum The Lee Enfield Knowledge Library Collectors Forum
    Replies: 6
    Last Post: 04-17-2009, 06:22 PM

Tags for this Thread

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts